-
@Kirwan
Imply is different to assert. He didn’t assert anything about being targeted as a Muslim. (Which is what you stated)
You have applied your interpretation to what he wrote just as he applied his interpretation to the notice.
Difference is that he has quickly recognized that he was wrong -
@Kirwan
Imply is different to assert. He didn’t assert anything about being targeted as a Muslim. (Which is what you stated)
You have applied your interpretation to what he wrote just as he applied his interpretation to the notice.
Difference is that he has quickly recognized that he was wrongYour point is super weak if you have to hang your hat on the difference between assert and imply.
And my point was that he was wrong in the first place, which we both agree about.
-
@Kirwan
Imply is different to assert. He didn’t assert anything about being targeted as a Muslim. (Which is what you stated)
You have applied your interpretation to what he wrote just as he applied his interpretation to the notice.
Difference is that he has quickly recognized that he was wrongYour point is super weak if you have to hang your hat on the difference between assert and imply.
And my point was that he was wrong in the first place, which we both agree about.
The point is all about reading into something what you want to see rather than what is actually there.
You clearly stated after reading the post that he asserted the photo was reported because of his Muslim faith when he wrote no such thing. Those were your words.
To assert something is a clear statement. The fact that he made no such statement points to his actual words which were that he was wondering about the intentions of the removal. Any inference is left to the reader.
I just find it hypocritical for you to point the finger at him when you are doing exactly the same thing.
-
@Kirwan
Imply is different to assert. He didn’t assert anything about being targeted as a Muslim. (Which is what you stated)
You have applied your interpretation to what he wrote just as he applied his interpretation to the notice.
Difference is that he has quickly recognized that he was wrongYour point is super weak if you have to hang your hat on the difference between assert and imply.
And my point was that he was wrong in the first place, which we both agree about.
The point is all about reading into something what you want to see rather than what is actually there.
You clearly stated after reading the post that he asserted the photo was reported because of his Muslim faith when he wrote no such thing. Those were your words.
To assert something is a clear statement. The fact that he made no such statement points to his actual words which were that he was wondering about the intentions of the removal. Any inference is left to the reader.
I just find it hypocritical for you to point the finger at him when you are doing exactly the same thing.
Exactly the same thing you say? In that case, I'm sorry for posting a photo of myself engaged in prayer with Ofa at the world cup on Instagram without permission.
My bad.
-
-
I don’t think he has anything further to apologize for. He’s apologized to the photographer and deleted the post. He got it wrong and immediately rectified his mistake.
It’s nothing bigger than that, and those who think it is, are the ones with the problem. Not SBW.
-
@MajorRage agree, complete nothing burger. Definitely not worth making a thread about.
-
@No-Quarter I got it wrong too and have moved on. Already admitted it.
Instagram