Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett
-
@jegga said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
@Frank the ratio on this one is interesting too https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/death_of_a_nation
That's pretty yucky though.
-
@booboo said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
@jegga said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
@Frank the ratio on this one is interesting too https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/death_of_a_nation
That's pretty yucky though.
Dunno anything about it, it was mentioned in an article about that obese fraud Michael Moore and his reviews
-
@jegga said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
@booboo said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
@jegga said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
@Frank the ratio on this one is interesting too https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/death_of_a_nation
That's pretty yucky though.
Dunno anything about it, it was mentioned in an article about that obese fraud Michael Moore and his reviews
Actually I don't either. Was getting seriously muxed ip.
Ignore that comment
-
@jegga said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
@Frank the ratio on this one is interesting too https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/death_of_a_nation
Good enough for me, just bought it, lets see just how bad RT is
-
another doozy https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/knock_down_the_house
-
Jussie Smollett investigation: Judge orders Google to turn over a full year of the actor’s data as part of special prosecutor probe
-
@Salacious-Crumb said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
Jussie Smollett investigation: Judge orders Google to turn over a full year of the actor’s data as part of special prosecutor probe
Well I'm sure as an extremely preachy young gay highly paid actor there will be nothing humiliating or illegal to come out here.
-
@Rembrandt i wonder what happens if evidence uncovers naughty actions of others that are unrelated to the case? Given his evident stupidity I can't imagine him being overly discreet about things!
-
All your data?
As much as I want to see Juicy scapegoated as a message, is this a one of those times where the principle of privacy outweighs the schadenfruede?
Having the law pore through your life seems a bit over the top, whatever the charge.
We've all accepted our online life can be seen by others and there is no genuine privacy but have we seen the potential real life repercussions of all our stored data, and in this case, at the whim of a judge.
Stinks a bit, to me. He lied and carried on like a pork chop - convict him on that.
-
@Siam said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
All your data?
As much as I want to see Juicy scapegoated as a message, is this a one of those times where the principle of privacy outweighs the schadenfruede?
Having the law pore through your life seems a bit over the top, whatever the charge.
We've all accepted our online life can be seen by others and there is no genuine privacy but have we seen the potential real life repercussions of all our stored data, and in this case, at the whim of a judge.
Stinks a bit, to me. He lied and carried on like a pork chop - convict him on that.
Absolutely, the guys a piece of shit but being able to access that data seems like over reach. Unless the warrant is specific for searches related to the hoax.
So much is going to leak.
-
I think the new EU rules mean you can request companies provide you with all the data they have on you.. but unsure if that includes all historic activity and/or data. California just enacted some new law also - have seen references to it come up on some IT helpdesk software we use.
-
State attorney Kim Fox is also having to lawyer up..a year worth of data is harsh but then I think of the threshold of his crime. He tried to start a race war for both personal and political gain..and he then double downed on it when mainstream outlets lapped it up...and then the charges basically disappeared after what appears to be potentially high-level political interference/corruption.
I think this meets the threshold for the data request. Might be a lot more to this yet.
-
@Kirwan said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
@Rembrandt If they can do it form him, they can do it for anybody. This is a bad precedent.
I pity the person that has to go through my search history.
-
@Kirwan I'd be surprised if this is a precedent. Google history searches appear to be a standard investigatory tool, a years worth however is concerning. Would you see a particular threshold as acceptable for such a court order? For me it would have to be loss of life or political corruption. Of course some courts will abuse it but I don't think cutting it out entirely is appropriate for some crimes.
-
I will add I'm in the process of detaching from Google due to some of their more concerning decisions of late. If they were to team up with a dodgy government during a moral panic from the public and media you'd have a devastating tool for citizen persecution.
-
@Kirwan said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
Unless the warrant is specific for searches related to the hoax.
It not be a difficult concept to grasp
Unfortunately some people divide the world into white hats vs black hats. Jussie has a black hat so fuck him. The same people cheering this on will then complain when the same is done to a white hat
-
@Duluth said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
@Kirwan said in Jussie "MAGA Country" Smollett:
Unless the warrant is specific for searches related to the hoax.
It not be a difficult concept to grasp
Unfortunately some people divide the world into white hats vs black hats. Jussie has a black hat so fuck him. The same people cheering this on will then complain when the same is done to a white hat
Yeah, it's that old saying about I was quiet until they came for me