Cannabis debate
-
@Crazy-Horse It think a guy in Oz fought a conviction (charge?) because of that limitation on the test. Can't recall if he won, lost, or if it's ongoing. Similar to alcohol there needs to be a test based on impairment rather than whether you've had some in the last 24-48 hours.
-
@Crazy-Horse ah ok, i thought there had been improvements in recent years, that does create a big hurdle if there isn't a way to test like alcohol.
@Paekakboyz impairment varies with alcohol in different people so ideally you have a measure like we do with alcohol...
-
@Paekakboyz I haven't heard that before.
It's a tough law. The ones getting charged are drivers who are not showing any signs of indicia. If there is sufficient indicia they get charged with diving UID.
We often get asked how long it stays in the system. It's a bit like how long is a piece of string? I have heard some people who have returned a positive test claim they haven't had any at all for at least four days, while others who returned a negative test have admitted to having some the night before. But then again, people don't always tell the truth.
-
Driving under the influence.
Smoked cannabis is no different than smoked tobacco when it comes to health.If these issues are addressed I wouldn’t necessarily be opposed to some sort of legalisation.
-
@gt12 said in Cannabis debate:
See here (linked from a ranked peer-reviewed journal):
CONFLICTING DATA ON TEENAGE USE Marijuana use is historically common among adolescents, and the drug has typically been easy to come by regardless of its legal status. Several studies have attempted to gauge its use among teens, but there have been contradictions in the findings as well as potential issues with the methodology. A recent study found that adolescents residing in states with liberal marijuana laws (medical and/or recreational) were more than twice as likely to try alternative means of use-vaping and edibles-than those living in states with stricter laws. The study's lead author, Jacob T. Borodovsky of the Center for Technology and Behavioral Health at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, explains that this finding reinforces the idea that if marijuana is more available, teens are more likely to try it.
Geisel School of Medicine. What an awesome name..
-
Seems to be a lot of confusion around 'medicinal use'
At the moment use of any 'cannabanoid' product is grouped alongside the use of THC.
For some bizarre reason, non THC products have to be prescribed by a doctor if your GP is 'anti' then you are shit out of luck.
Even more strangely we are looking at legalising the use of THC but not making CBD legal (without a prescription and high cost). So you could get high but not take a 'health supplement'.
Some may argue that CBD belongs in the woo thread and there is plenty of reasearch and argument to go into that topic yet. However there is next to no evidence of harm from this product and lots of anecdotal evidence of postive effects. It is sold openly without restriction in many countries with zero harm.
This all has nothing to do with the referendum though as nothing in this area will change.
Just pointing out that 'medicinal use' is already catered for under law but the many variations are all grouped alongside getting stoned to relieve pain.
-
@voodoo said in Cannabis debate:
@Hooroo said in Cannabis debate:
.I don’t want weed cafes in nz but I would like to see it decriminalised.
Why not?
Is it any worse than seeing 18yr olds stumble out of pubs at 2am? Vomiting in gutters?
I've been to a bunch of weed cafes and they were all very civil
True. I suppose they will only be able to take the shape of a eatery as you can't smoke inside in NZ.
-
@taniwharugby similar to Amsterdam where most folks going overboard at the cafes are tourists not the locals.... although there will no doubt be some hardcore Dutchies
-
Important also to understand that this is a referendum to indicate to parliament that you want them to work out how to do this practically, safely, and with input over concerns.
This is not a binding 'as proposed' thing.I am going to decide based on whether I want them to have the chance to sort it out and put it to the floor. I would be hoping that many of the concerns would be debated and ironed out.
-
just read this Letter to the Editor in the Northern Advocate...
I have not fact checked it
-
@taniwharugby said in Cannabis debate:
just read this Letter to the Editor in the Northern Advocate...
I have not fact checked it
It’s a bunch of %s quite possibly misrepresenting numbers.
2 young people being caught driving when there was 1 the previous year is a big % increase but not a number to be concerned about. -
@Crucial said in Cannabis debate:
@taniwharugby said in Cannabis debate:
just read this Letter to the Editor in the Northern Advocate...
I have not fact checked it
It’s a bunch of %s quite possibly misrepresenting numbers.
2 young people being caught driving when there was 1 the previous year is a big % increase but not a number to be concerned about.ditto the Study referenced - I think it was a joint study between Dunedin and Christchurch, and while they said cannabis was associated with increased risks of psychosis, they considered that it was a low risk element, and overall supported the bill. So a bit of cherry picking going on.
-
-
@taniwharugby the current meme is actually "always has been"
-
@Paekakboyz can't be, I haven't seen @MN5 post it on his FB 🤣
-
@taniwharugby ask his kids lol!!
-
@taniwharugby said in Cannabis debate:
@Paekakboyz can't be, I haven't seen @MN5 post it on his FB 🤣
What ? How did I get involved in this drug ridden circle jerk ?
-
@taniwharugby yeah my immediate thought there jumps to - how are they getting these measurements/statistics? Is it kids saying "yeah I did it"? Is it better recorded now than 5 years ago and so you're more likely to see better stats? If something is illegal, I imagine you're far less likely to get reliable stats than if it's just naughty.
Strikes me as a rather disingenuous letter.