Jeffrey Epstein



  • It's the weirdest thing..when you go to Project Veritas's videos and filter by most popular..this Epstein one with 2.1million views no longer appears. It still is visible if you filter by 'New' or go to their 'Home' or 'Videos' tab. It's too big for youtube to unlist but maybe this points to a possible change to get it de-ranked.

    I miss the good old days when I thought media agencies would be keen to bring wealth paedophiles to justice rather than doing everything they can to cover for them. Thinking about it I'm guessing there was similar pushback when exposing the Catholic church paedophile scandals in the early 2000's

    https://www.youtube.com/user/veritasvisuals/videos?view=0&sort=p&flow=grid



  • @Rembrandt
    In my country, searching using the terms- project veritas epstein - does not reveal the video in the search results., only other news stations talking about it.

    I guess YouTube doesn't want Project Veritas to increase their subscriber count.



  • I wonder what other shenanigans Prince Andrew has got up to that have been glossed over in exchange for baby pics or other bullshit?

    In the American scandal podcast they said Epstein managed to convince people he’d fucked a girl who told him she was older than she was hence the light jail sentence . Weird that Chelsea Handler was photographed staying on the island , she recently went full sjw so this’ll take some explaining



  • @jegga brilliant podcast that one, ta. Painted the realisation (as quoted by the victims) that anybody in Epsteins presence HAD to have turned a blind eye to scantily dressed obviously under aged blonde girls simply hanging around all the time. Pilots, doctors ( std checks on under agers), dentists cleaners, airport staff, and all manner of guests.

    Totally dodgy.

    As it stands I think the " authorities" gave him a window of time to end himself.



  • @Tim said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    Looks like she has been fired now, which is going down like a cup of cold sick to the majority of people.

    Love that this isn't just dying as the large media outlets wanted it to. I'm part way through the podcast @jegga linked and it's absolutely crazy. I hope a bunch of these sick fuck super rich people fall on their swords.



  • What exactly is it about politicians, media and headline swallowers defending paedophiles? Catholic church, Rochdale et al in the UK and the billionaire elite.

    Is it so hard to just have some ounce of decency and say r4p3ing children is wrong? These folk aren't just happy covering for these sick bastards they actually go to the extent on demonising whistleblowers - Racists! Crazy conspiracy theorists!

    And the average Joe on the street? Well they read the headline from the guardian and Epstein killed himself, bit don't worry about that the real issue in the world is orange man.

    Infuriating doesn't quite describe it.



  • They fired the wrong person. The whistleblower is still unknown.

    Don't you love media folk. The host who made the comments was more pissed that she didn't get to break the story rather than her company enabling a paedo to be a predator for 3 more years. Same too this young girl who didn't want to lose her job..and maybe the dozens of others who were aware of this and did nothing.

    People may not like James O'Keeffe but by Christ he and Project Veritas are doing great work revealing this sick corruption to the masses





  • Not a bad job considering its 60 minutes



  • Lol, this isn't dying like many of these elites want it to. It's definitely harder to keep a lid on things these days.



  • @No-Quarter who begins a tweet with a space, let alone an apostrophe? And all that lower case. Wild indeed.



  • Interesting take in the final episode of Broken podcast.

    Epstein may have paid some one to off him because he was too weak to do it himself and too weak to do the time.



  • The whole Prince Andrew/Emily Matlis interview. I expect Pizza Express in Woking to be packed out today:



  • @sparky said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    The whole Prince Andrew/Emily Matlis interview. I expect Pizza Express in Woking to be packed out today:

    *Interviewer:

    He was released in July, within months by December of 2010 you went to stay with him at his New York mansion, why? Why were you staying with a convicted sex offender?

    Prince Andrew:

    Right, I have always...ever since this has happened and since this has become, as it were, public knowledge that I was there, I’ve questioned myself as to why did I go and what was I doing and was it the right thing to do? Now, I went there with the sole purpose of saying to him that because he had been convicted, it was inappropriate for us to be seen together.

    .....

    Interviewer:

    I’m just trying to work this out because you said you went to break up the relationship and yet you stayed at that New York mansion several days.*

    ....uh huh..



  • I wonder when the spotlight is going to descend on Clinton?



  • @jegga said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    I wonder when the spotlight is going to descend on Clinton?

    Over :insert numerous names:'s dead body!



  • Full transcript: https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1205447/prince-andrew-BBC-newsnight-interview-jeffrey-epstein-full-transcript

    Prince Andrew:
    No, that couldn’t have happened because the date that’s being suggested I was at home with the children.
    Interviewer:
    You know that you were at home with the children, was it a memorable night?
    Prince Andrew:
    on that particular day that we now understand is the date which is the 10th of March, I was at home, I was with the children and I’d taken Beatrice to a Pizza Express in Woking for a party

    ffs not this again! Let the memes begin



  • @Rembrandt
    What a fuckin' liar.
    You don't go visit another guy friend to say you want to "break up" the friendship. You avoid him or at most give him a call. Moreover, you don't stay there for several days.

    He went there for the girls/women.
    And now he has been caught and is trying to cover his tracks.



  • @jegga said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    I wonder when the spotlight is going to descend on Clinton?

    Dem' press won't cover it if ABC anything is to go by.



  • @Frank said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    @jegga said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    I wonder when the spotlight is going to descend on Clinton?

    Dem' press won't cover it if ABC anything is to go by.

    Prince Peado mentioned that too as another excuse why he kept touch with those monsters. "It wasn't in the news anymore".

    The sooner msm dies the better.

    Had the misfortune of listening to aussies channel 9 news this evening, just blatant lies on the Trump impeachment inquiry. Didn't even think to mention their star witness admitting there was no wrong doing from Trump...you don't have to like the guy or portray him fairly but ffs at least report on the key facts of the story.

    Media lies, people believe bs and billionaire celebs, politicians and business people get away with trafficking kids.





  • @jegga said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    I wonder when the spotlight is going to descend on Clinton?

    Given Epstein was running the ring in broad daylight, and everyone knew what was happening on his Island, some questions to Bill around what he was doing visiting that Island all the time are well overdue.





  • @Rembrandt
    I think those who signed that letter are all minority Republicans. Not sure they have authority to investigate anything.





  • Good question!

    alt text



  • Apart from being a sleaze and probably lying about it what has Prince Andrew actually done that was illegal?

    I don't want to defend the sleaze ball but unless he was aware that Giuffre was being held by Maxwell and Epstein against her will then all he has possibly done is commit adultery. Even in Guiffre's interview she admitted giving an impression to him that she was a willing party. She admits that she asked for that photo to be taken to show her parents.
    Her story is obviously complicated and when she was underage there were illegal acts but she would have appeared to be a very willing participant at that time.



  • @Crucial
    I agree.
    As much as I enjoy a nob like Prince Andrew being taken to task, I am unsure of the crime he has committed unless it can be proven he knew she was some kind of sex slave.



  • @Frank said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    @Crucial
    I agree.
    As much as I enjoy a nob like Prince Andrew being taken to task, I am unsure of the crime he has committed unless it can be proven he knew she was some kind of sex slave.

    It's all the jokes about him being a paedo that crack me up. Age of consent is mainly 16 and less in most of the world (yes, a few US States are 18 I think)

    EDIT: I am making these PA comments based on the published 'facts'. I am also fully aware that rumours around him liking them young have been around for a long time and may or may not be based on actuality



  • He's an easy one to name and shame and rightfully so. He has daughters himself but saw no issue with teen girls hanging about with an open paedophile..one he still maintained contact with after being convicted. There is arguably a law that was broken there failing to report child abuse. I'd love to see the dentists, home help and private doctors who gave these girls std checks also get named, hopefully someone is willing to spill the beans to save their own hides.



  • @Rembrandt said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    He's an easy one to name and shame and rightfully so. He has daughters himself but saw no issue with teen girls hanging about with an open paedophile..one he still maintained contact with after being convicted. There is arguably a law that was broken there failing to report child abuse. I'd love to see the dentists, home help and private doctors who gave these girls std checks also get named, hopefully someone is willing to spill the beans to save their own hides.

    Back to the 'evidence' rather than the assumptions. Did he see (or have knowledge of ) underage girls being abused?
    If not then he can't be held culpable for Epstein's crimes.
    Not sure what having daughters is all about.

    Yes to being a sleaze. Yes to choosing his friends poorly. At the moment though I see no evidence of illegality.



  • @Crucial said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    Apart from being a sleaze and probably lying about it what has Prince Andrew actually done that was illegal?

    In most of the news and commentaries, criminality is barely mentioned, if at all. I suspect Liz didn’t shitcan her boy from Buckingham Palace because she was worried he did anything “illegal,” but mostly that he consorted with a convicted sex offender who trafficked girls as sex slaves, which is dragging her royal family’s name through the mud. Fairly straightforward.



  • @Crucial Yep only evidence I've heard is victim interviews who confirm that Jeffrey's paedo antics were a very open secret, not exactly hard evidence at this stage.

    I'd like to think that if you have a teen daughter you should be even more sensitive to 60 year old creepy men getting massaged by teens or even just hanging out with them at parties. I mean that should be a given anyway but even a creep who has a kid might start to think 'what if that was my daughter' and realise just how dodgy these situations were.



  • @Salacious-Crumb said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    @Crucial said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    Apart from being a sleaze and probably lying about it what has Prince Andrew actually done that was illegal?

    In most of the news and commentaries, criminality is barely mentioned, if at all. I suspect Liz didn’t shitcan her boy from Buckingham Palace because she was worried he did anything “illegal,” but mostly that he consorted with a convicted sex offender who trafficked girls as sex slaves, which is dragging her royal family’s name through the mud. Fairly straightforward.

    I get all that, just don't get why he is being judged as if he has committed a criminal act when (on the face of it) he may have had sex with a young woman of legal age. Can't claim adultery as good reason either (it is hardly uncommon).

    Yes it isn't behaviour befitting someone in a public position but it is way OTT (unless evidence that he knew about coercion and trafficking arises).



  • @Crucial said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    I get all that, just don't get why he is being judged as if he has committed a criminal act when (on the face of it) he may have had sex with a young woman of legal age. Can't claim adultery as good reason either (it is hardly uncommon).

    So, Her Royal Majesty is overreacting, is she?



  • @Salacious-Crumb said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    @Crucial said in Jeffrey Epstein:

    I get all that, just don't get why he is being judged as if he has committed a criminal act when (on the face of it) he may have had sex with a young woman of legal age. Can't claim adultery as good reason either (it is hardly uncommon).

    So, Her Royal Majesty is overreacting, is she?

    Not sure anyone knows how the Queens is reacting. What we can comment on is the media reporting of it and there's a substantial amount of it.

    From what I've read the only issue is he maintained a relationship with Epstein, staying at his house for days after his conviction.



  • _20191213_201939.JPG



  • Coincidences.

    Surveillance footage outside of Jeffrey Epstein’s cell during suicide attempt is missing

    https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-epstein-tartaglione-video-footage-20191218-riodo5rhvfhuznn45knlyfrj2m-story.html

    NOTE: This isn’t the missing video from the “successful” “suicide” where the video cameras mysteriously malfunctioned; this is the earlier “unsuccessful” “suicide” “attempt.”

    I like the part where they were so concerned about his safety, they locked him up with a choirboy:

    “Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Swergold admitted nobody can find the footage of the outside of the cell the multimillionaire perv shared with accused quadruple murderer Nick Tartaglione during a hearing in White Plains District Court. Tartaglione, a former Briarcliff Manor cop, faces the death penalty for the alleged murders in a drug deal gone bad.”



  • CBS 60 Minutes did a feature on Jeffrey’s suicide tonight; they showed autopsy photos. What surprised me was they mentioned the guard who found Epstein’s body still hasn’t spoken to investigators. The piece did mention the guards fell asleep, and maybe Jeffrey was dead for two hours (!!) before they woke up. Sleeping gas?? This has all the earmarks of a Batman episode...



  • The “accidents” and “mistakes” and “coincidences” just keep piling up.

    NBC News reporting this afternoon: Federal prosecutors say that video taken from outside of Jeffrey Epstein's cell the night of his FIRST suicide attempt in July has been permanently deleted because MCC saved video from the wrong tier of the jail and not the tier Epstein was on, a filing says.


Log in to reply