Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****
-
@Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@MN5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
Marshall Givens in Mando!
Awesome.
So if Tem isn’t playing Boba Fett is he possibly playing a clone? Could make sense that there are still some clones hanging around in this timeframe.
It’s possible but he might need a bit of make up to look older given they age twice as fast.
10 SW years between the last sighting of Captain Rex (Rebels) and Mando. Twenty years since Tem was cloned (real time)
Rex was already grey. However there would have been newer clones than him.
So an original clone during Mando time would be about 45 ( 90 ) then ?
Correct me if I'm wrong but purely from the movies canon.....the original clones were "born" probably around TPM.....13 years til ROTS.....20 years til ANH......5 or so years til ROTJ......6 or so years til Mando ?
The period between Han being frozen and then rescued is a bit of a grey area much like the amount of time Luke actually spent on Dagobah which confuses things a bit but Tem could theoretically play a 90 year old Clone with a bit of make up, or a scarred Boba Fett. Perhaps it's only his voice they're using ?
-
@MN5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@MN5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
Marshall Givens in Mando!
Awesome.
So if Tem isn’t playing Boba Fett is he possibly playing a clone? Could make sense that there are still some clones hanging around in this timeframe.
It’s possible but he might need a bit of make up to look older given they age twice as fast.
10 SW years between the last sighting of Captain Rex (Rebels) and Mando. Twenty years since Tem was cloned (real time)
Rex was already grey. However there would have been newer clones than him.
So an original clone during Mando time would be about 45 ( 90 ) then ?
Correct me if I'm wrong but purely from the movies canon.....the original clones were "born" probably around TPM.....13 years til ROTS.....20 years til ANH......5 or so years til ROTJ......6 or so years til Mando ?
The period between Han being frozen and then rescued is a bit of a grey area much like the amount of time Luke actually spent on Dagobah which confuses things a bit but Tem could theoretically play a 90 year old Clone with a bit of make up, or a scarred Boba Fett. Perhaps it's only his voice they're using ?
There’s a well accepted timeframe based on BBY (before battle of Yavin).
Rex was aged as around a 50 odd year old near the end of Rebels. So roughly a 70 year old by Mando if the double rate theory is correct. There may have been clones from later batches though -
@Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@MN5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@MN5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@Crucial said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
Marshall Givens in Mando!
Awesome.
So if Tem isn’t playing Boba Fett is he possibly playing a clone? Could make sense that there are still some clones hanging around in this timeframe.
It’s possible but he might need a bit of make up to look older given they age twice as fast.
10 SW years between the last sighting of Captain Rex (Rebels) and Mando. Twenty years since Tem was cloned (real time)
Rex was already grey. However there would have been newer clones than him.
So an original clone during Mando time would be about 45 ( 90 ) then ?
Correct me if I'm wrong but purely from the movies canon.....the original clones were "born" probably around TPM.....13 years til ROTS.....20 years til ANH......5 or so years til ROTJ......6 or so years til Mando ?
The period between Han being frozen and then rescued is a bit of a grey area much like the amount of time Luke actually spent on Dagobah which confuses things a bit but Tem could theoretically play a 90 year old Clone with a bit of make up, or a scarred Boba Fett. Perhaps it's only his voice they're using ?
There’s a well accepted timeframe based on BBY (before battle of Yavin).
Rex was aged as around a 50 odd year old near the end of Rebels. So roughly a 70 year old by Mando if the double rate theory is correct. There may have been clones from later batches thoughI thought the Emperor did away with them cos he was worried the batches would get contaminated and the original template was deteriorating ?
It conveniently explains how the troopers went from killing Jedi to losing to teddy bears over a relatively short period of time.
-
@Machpants said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@MN5 there is a lot of case law out there which includes mental age and/or capability with respect to consent. She'd be treading on thin legal ice!
The rules were different A long time ago in a Galaxy far far away. She's all good
-
I'm watching Disney Gallery: The Mandalorian. A behind the scenes look at the TV series. It is brilliant, a SW fan's dream. In episode two Dave Filoni explains the arc of Anakin and Luke in the first 6 SW films in a riveting 5 minutes, mesmerizing the entire roundtable. It was intense and emotional
-
Holy shit!
-
Some of them sound plausible, but at least 2 don't fit right to me. SW1 Rise of Skywalker doesn't work, Anakin is introduced but during the film and by the finish I would not define his progression as a rise. SW4 Return of the Jedi, if you refer to the return of Obi Wan maybe. But he is not a primary character, he is a supporting one albeit an important one in the context of the trilogy. It can't refer to Luke because he is not even a Jedi in training by the end of the film
-
@canefan said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
Some of them sound plausible, but at least 2 don't fit right to me. SW1 Rise of Skywalker doesn't work, Anakin is introduced but during the film and by the finish I would not define his progression as a rise. SW4 Return of the Jedi, if you refer to the return of Obi Wan maybe. But he is not a primary character, he is a supporting one albeit an important one in the context of the trilogy. It can't refer to Luke because he is not even a Jedi in training by the end of the film
There’s always one geek who tries to out nerd the rest of us
-
@MN5 said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
@canefan said in Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****:
Some of them sound plausible, but at least 2 don't fit right to me. SW1 Rise of Skywalker doesn't work, Anakin is introduced but during the film and by the finish I would not define his progression as a rise. SW4 Return of the Jedi, if you refer to the return of Obi Wan maybe. But he is not a primary character, he is a supporting one albeit an important one in the context of the trilogy. It can't refer to Luke because he is not even a Jedi in training by the end of the film
There’s always one geek who tries to out nerd the rest of us
The more I listen the more I realise he's all wrong