-
@Catogrande said in Brexit:
One eyed scotch fluffybunny.
Oh, I don't know. He certainly had his finger on the pulse of global affairs....
"Our ability to connect as a nation with other nations around the world is enhanced dramatically by the Internet." Gordon Brown, 2005.
-
@Victor-Meldrew He’s a godamn genius
-
@Victor-Meldrew better than a series of tubes at least...
-
Jesus H Christ
-
@MiketheSnow said in Brexit:
Jesus H Christ
Meanwhile EU Parliament is debating whether to aprove the bill OR NOT.
Isn't the pantomine season finished?
-
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in Brexit:
That is certainly trade orthodoxy. But if such agreements lead to substantial job losses as e.g. Chinese imports replace Northern jobs, the net is more of the population reliant on social welfare.
It's going to happen anyway, so be prepared to compete . No point in protecting all those highly paid jobs producing those shiny BMW's when your export markets slap quotas on your goods in retaliation.
At the risk of offending the purists, I see no point in facilitating the migration of manufacturing offshore when the crucial overseas competitive advantage is lower/no environmental/labour conditions/social welfare standards. So if the UK has sensible standards in these areas, and its cost of power is competitive, then the labour content of manufacture is going to have to be very high to outweigh appropriate tariffs and the cost of transport from, say, the Far East.
WTO tariffs are inadequate to compensate, so China being admitted was a massive con job. Carbon border tax would be a way of rasing tariffs towards reasonable levels.
A key question becomes the cost of labour. Here things become quite distorted by the minimum wage question. UK has made a big thing of the virtue of setting level for these ever higher, but if that prices manufacture out IMO such minima do more harm than good. Even then, EU and UK cheat by allowing Eastern Europeans in and allowing practices which usurp the regulation, albeit in quite limited areas. Which to me is just a tacit admission the the levels are wrong, even if the concept itself has merit.
Trivial example, maybe, by it seems wholly incoherent to pursue policies which result in chocolate good manufacture in UK to be unable to compete viably with mass production in China and shipping across to the other side of the world. To me bonkers.
As a consequence, I'm not opposed to tariffs being set at a level which protects economies with decent social welfare, environmental and labour laws. WTO levels too low. I'm all for carbon border taxes.
Needs to be managed carefully, for sure. A short-term measure while you address the need to become competitive.
I think it's more fundamental. For now China relies on coal power to produce a huge amount of its energy. The alternatives are more expensive. CBT ought to be retained until and unless China moves to greener energy sources. BTW no idea how anyone can ever verify compliance.
There's very, very few leading edge industries in the EU compared to the US, China or Japan.
Absolutely right.
Now you're taking!
-
@majorrage said in Brexit:
Confusing article this one.
I can't see how this can be anything but a good thing for the UK? Reading through it, it's almost like the author is desepreatly trying to figure out how this is bad for GB, but can't ....
Very tough on Welsh ports
-
@mikethesnow How man people can truck rollon/rolloff employ?
And doesn't the extra paperwork offset the reduced physical workload?
Not arguments to your point, more questions.
-
Oh the delicious irony
-
Ha! You couldn’t make this shit up!
-
@mikethesnow said in Brexit:
Oh the delicious irony
Ha, that's worse than the Cornish orchsdist who voted Brexit then demanded the government help him to fly in fruit pickers from EU nations!
-
-
@catogrande said in Brexit:
Ha! You couldn’t make this shit up!
Apparently The Telegraph did - as Tim Martin points out...
“I was trying to be helpful to the journalist by providing up-to-date anecdotal information on staffing, which clearly demonstrated a very positive situation for Wetherspoon. However, my comments were misreported. The false story, expressed in the headline “Wetherspoons boss calls for more EU migration as bars and restaurants tackle staff shortage” and expressed or implied elsewhere in the article, was that Wetherspoon was suffering staff shortages, which clearly isn’t true, and that I had subsequently been moved to change my stance on immigration, which, as my evidence to the parliament several ago clearly shows, isn’t true either.”
-
@victor-meldrew surely not! Journalists bending the truth to fit their agenda?!? Colour me shocked.
-
@victor-meldrew NZ 1 Wales 0.
-
@victor-meldrew NZ 1 Wales 0.
The UK media are streets ahead in the Just Make Shit Up world championships
-
@victor-meldrew Tim Martin got seriously mis-quoted at the beginning of the pandemic around telling his staff "to stack shelves at Tesco" too. Maybe the media have something against the mulleted one?
-
@catogrande said in Brexit:
@victor-meldrew Tim Martin got seriously mis-quoted at the beginning of the pandemic around telling his staff "to stack shelves at Tesco" too. Maybe the media have something against the mulleted one?
I remember this. I couldn't see the problem with it at all with respect to the misquote or the clarification.
It's basically the CEO of a company saying "I can't pay you at the moment, I'll register you for Furlough but I have no control over the time taken here, so in the meantime if ou find work elsewhere, I'd strongly recommend you take it". He even then promised that staff that did that will have first option to return to Wetherspoons if they liked. He should have been praised for it.
But of course, it's easier to look at his wealth (of which I'm sure most is paper only) and think he should personally sell his shares/assets to give a cash injection into the company so his staff can be paid ...
It was absurd.
Brexit