Coronavirus - Overall
-
@antipodean funny how you single out fox.
-
@Salacious-Crumb said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@antipodean funny how you single out fox.
Why is it funny?
-
@antipodean said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Salacious-Crumb said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@antipodean funny how you single out fox.
Why is it funny?
Where do you get your science from, then? Twitter?
The guy you quoted sums up thusly:
“...it appears that the genetic differences in #nCoV2019 are consistent with differences expected to arise during natural evolution,...”
“Appears” means conclusive?
-
@Salacious-Crumb said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@antipodean said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Salacious-Crumb said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@antipodean funny how you single out fox.
Why is it funny?
Where do you get your science from, then? Twitter?
Can't explain why you find it funny?
The guy you quoted sums up thusly:
“...it appears that the genetic differences in #nCoV2019 are consistent with differences expected to arise during natural evolution,...”
“Appears” means conclusive?
You know why experts tend to couch their statements? Because they acknowledge the possibility of new evidence. I'll take people who know what they're talking about over talking foreheads and journalists.
-
@antipodean What, I gotta explain comedy now? This might have been the first time, certainly in the past twenty years, that I think I’ve seen-or-heard the Washington Post referred as an “et al” appended in relation to Fox News. Contextually funny. It’s not a huge laugh, but it makes me giggle.
-
@antipodean said in Coronavirus - Overall:
You know why experts tend to couch their statements?
Yeah, like politicians. Many of these “experts” have helped get us to where we are right now.
Because they acknowledge the possibility of new evidence.
Exactly. Facts on the ground change. And new reports are coming out this hour that the Chinese destroyed evidence.
I’m reading reports. Is it fabricated nonsense? Could be. Don’t shoot the messenger.
I'll take people who know what they're talking about over talking foreheads and journalists.
Okay, so no evidence was destroyed. End of. Next.
-
@Salacious-Crumb said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@antipodean What, I gotta explain comedy now? This might have been the first time, certainly in the past twenty years, that I think I’ve seen-or-heard the Washington Post referred as an “et al” appended in relation to Fox News. Contextually funny. It’s not a huge laugh, but it makes me giggle.
That would be a very generous inference from what you originally implied. For your own future benefit, me typing et al is simply because I couldn't be fucked typing them all out. Had you put WaPo first in your list, it would've been WaPo et al in my response.
-
@antipodean It was right there from the first draft. No stealth edits — hell, it’s even in your quote, and I cannot alter that. Washington Post. Wall Street Journal, too. Have a go at them while you’re at it.
-
@Salacious-Crumb said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@antipodean It was rigt there from the first minute. No stealth edits. Washington Post. Wall Street Journal, too. Have a go at them while you’re at it.
Look up et al ffs. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/et-al
-
Look, this is a silly argument. I just ask questions. And I’m glad to know there’s somebody with the answers and can provide me some comic relief. Thank you.
-
@Salacious-Crumb said in Coronavirus - Overall:
Look, this is a silly argument. I just ask questions. And I’m glad to know there’s somebody with the answers and can provide me some comic relief. Thank you.
Great, so now you can nominate me in these two threads:
-
I don't think the disease was manufactured, but reports I read seemed to indicate it came from a lab that was studying infectious diseases (as opposed to creating them). Is that plausible?
I'm interested to hear your thoughts on where this may have originated - obviously it's all guess work and we probably won't ever get a definitive answer.
-
@No-Quarter said in Coronavirus - Overall:
I don't think the disease was manufactured, but reports I read seemed to indicate it came from a lab that was studying infectious diseases (as opposed to creating them). Is that plausible?
I'm interested to hear your thoughts on where this may have originated - obviously it's all guess work and we probably won't ever get a definitive answer.
What I read was that the virus was characteristic of a coronavirus that had mutated as opposed to something totally new
-
@antipodean said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Salacious-Crumb said in Coronavirus - Overall:
Look, this is a silly argument. I just ask questions. And I’m glad to know there’s somebody with the answers and can provide me some comic relief. Thank you.
Great, so now you can nominate me in these two threads:
The playground is lively today.
-
-
@Bones said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@antipodean said in Coronavirus - Overall:
Clap for Connie.
They probably should have fixed that before letting her out
-