• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Canes v Tahs (and drinks?)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
hurricaneswaratahs
217 Posts 48 Posters 20.7k Views
Canes v Tahs (and drinks?)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #82

    <p>Nothing in this either, Foley has slipped right into that!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="595485" data-time="1468060321"><p>So Foley had possesion, then it was knocked out of his hands by TJP. Is that a knock on? What did we decide in that other thread?</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Nah this one was different <br><br><br>
    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    <p>Nothing in that.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    <p>That is terrible refereeing.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>No way that's a card!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #86

    This is what we ended the other thread with:<br><br><blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crucial" data-cid="594481" data-time="1467783504"><p>The relevant point (according to the refs directives) is who lost possession not how they lost it. <br>
    West had possession, Eves never did. <br>
    If West had let go of the ball in a pass before Eves made contact then Eve's knocked the ball forward. If West was still in contact (not control Mr Marshall), then just like scoring a try, he remains in possession. If he then loses the ball backward (even if it is touched by Eve's), it is play on.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    So should have been a try based on that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    Haha, the hometown touchie calls it a YC<br><br><br>
    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    wrote on last edited by
    #88

    Pollock a cock to the end

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="595492" data-time="1468060544"><p>Nothing in that.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    On slowmo that looked fucking awful. Single, swinging arm without looking at the man<br><br>
    Foley slipping didn't help, but he didn't even have eyes on target

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    wrote on last edited by
    #90

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="595497" data-time="1468060674">
    <div>
    <p>On slowmo that looked fucking awful. Single, swinging arm without looking at the man<br><br>
    Foley slipping didn't help, but he didn't even have eyes on target</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>the arm swung because he didn't have nything to grab because Foley was already on his way down</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #91

    <p>Clear penalty but it's a harsh YC when a player drops in front of you like that.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    <p>A couple very bullshit calls there result in a 10 point shift - Canes denied a 7 pointer, followed up by the Tahds being gifted 3 points!</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Fuck you Pollock!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #93

    <p>i would want to see that at normal speed to be sure, but in the slo-mo it looked like he could have pulled out after foley slipped - and that makes it nasty and dangerous. if i was sure of that i'd give him red, but i might well be being fooled by the slo-mo.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #94

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tordah" data-cid="595498" data-time="1468060790">
    <div>
    <p>the arm swung because he didn't have nything to grab because Foley was already on his way down</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Exactly!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    <p>No way that was a yellow. Ridiculous.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="595497" data-time="1468060674"><p>
    On slowmo that looked fucking awful. Single, swinging arm without looking at the man<br><br>
    Foley slipping didn't help, but he didn't even have eyes on target</p></blockquote>Garbage. Foley was on his knees by the time contact was made. <br><br>
    I have no idea how Skelton didn't get marched for his elbow drop on to Shield's head.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #97

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="595497" data-time="1468060674">
    <div>
    <p>On slowmo that looked fucking awful. Single, swinging arm without looking at the man<br><br>
    Foley slipping didn't help, but he didn't even have eyes on target</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Yeah and so did the Skelton one but then you liked a post saying you could penalise any clean out based on slow-mo. So, ya know.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    wrote on last edited by
    #98

    <p>It's amazing how we get footage of things that look bad for the Hurricanes instantly, yet it takes ages to get them for the Waratahs...</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #99

    <p>Way too easy. Pathetic defence.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hurricane
    wrote on last edited by
    #100

    Incredible solo effort try

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #101

    Came from a pretty piss poor clearing kick from Barrett too...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Canes v Tahs (and drinks?)
Rugby Matches
hurricaneswaratahs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.