The Silver Fern

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Users
    • Tipping
    • Thread Topics
    • Highlights
    • Team Sheets
    • NPC Results
    • Upvote Leaderboard
        • TSF
        • Home Page
        • Browse Posts
        • Tipping
        • Tipping Home
        • Submit Your Tips
        • Current Tips
          Rugby Info
        • Team Sheets
        • Highlights
        • Rugby Results
        • AB Results
        • SR Results
        • NPC Results
          Forum Links
        • Leaderboard
        • Popular Topics
        • Topic Tags

    Syria

    Politics
    25
    141
    11164
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • taniwharugby
      taniwharugby last edited by

      so in response to the Chemical weapon attacks, Trump has ordered a military strike.

      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11834020

      Baron Silas Greenback 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Baron Silas Greenback
        Baron Silas Greenback @taniwharugby last edited by

        @taniwharugby said in Syria:

        so in response to the Chemical weapon attacks, Trump has ordered a military strike.

        http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11834020

        Massive win for Trump on the political side.
        It is almost tailor made to show that he is a stronger president than Obama, sends a message to other countries... and was a pretty limited strike.

        Duluth 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • antipodean
          antipodean last edited by antipodean

          About 10% of the cruise missiles used at the start of the Iraq war in 2003 which in itself is a worrying trend - the ability to engage in warfare without consequence. At least with troops on the ground, you have casualties which provide a moment of pause.

          You can make claims about the need to act after evidence of poisonous gas strikes, but this merely prolongs the war; removing a capability for Assad to deal with ISIS and the Rebels. The longer this goes on, the worse it gets for everyone.

          canefan 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • canefan
            canefan @antipodean last edited by

            @antipodean said in Syria:

            About 10% of the cruise missiles used at the start of the Iraq war in 2003 which in itself is a worrying trend - the ability to engage in warfare without consequence. At least with troops on the ground, you have casualties which provide a moment of pause.

            You can make claims about the need to act after evidence of poisonous gas strikes, but this merely prolongs the war; removing a capability for Assad to deal with ISIS and the Rebels. The longer this goes on, the worse it gets for everyone.

            Easier said than done when Assad and Putin are in bed together

            antipodean 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • antipodean
              antipodean @canefan last edited by

              @canefan Are you making an argument for regime change?

              canefan 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • canefan
                canefan @antipodean last edited by

                @antipodean Which one?

                antipodean 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • antipodean
                  antipodean @canefan last edited by

                  @canefan Take your pick, but they're currently fighting in Syria.

                  canefan 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • canefan
                    canefan @antipodean last edited by canefan

                    @antipodean said in Syria:

                    @canefan Take your pick, but they're currently fighting in Syria.

                    Always difficult, as we've seen in other countries, sometimes the new lot is worse than the current lot

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Duluth
                      Duluth @Baron Silas Greenback last edited by

                      @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Syria:

                      Massive win for Trump on the political side.
                      It is almost tailor made to show that he is a stronger president than Obama, sends a message to other countries... and was a pretty limited strike.

                      There's definitely some political positives.

                      However he is going against some clear statements from his campaign.

                      Baron Silas Greenback 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Baron Silas Greenback
                        Baron Silas Greenback @Duluth last edited by

                        @Duluth said in Syria:

                        @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Syria:

                        Massive win for Trump on the political side.
                        It is almost tailor made to show that he is a stronger president than Obama, sends a message to other countries... and was a pretty limited strike.

                        There's definitely some political positives.

                        However he is going against some clear statements from his campaign.

                        I think a chemical weapons attack on children is the best (most sellable) reason he could get for changing position.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jegga
                          jegga last edited by

                          I wonder what the next step is? A no fly zone?

                          Baron Silas Greenback 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Baron Silas Greenback
                            Baron Silas Greenback @jegga last edited by

                            @jegga said in Syria:

                            I wonder what the next step is? A no fly zone?

                            I don't think there will be a next step.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • Tim
                              Tim last edited by

                              Stick to that thought, Donald.

                              Duluth H 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 11
                              • Duluth
                                Duluth @Tim last edited by

                                @Tim

                                NTA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 9
                                • NTA
                                  NTA @Duluth last edited by

                                  @Duluth @Tim

                                  Baron Silas Greenback 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                                  • NTA
                                    NTA last edited by NTA

                                    This post is deleted!
                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Baron Silas Greenback
                                      Baron Silas Greenback @NTA last edited by

                                      @NTA @Duluth @Tim

                                      Not sure what point you guys are trying to make? He should not have bombed? That he should not change his mind in 4 years?

                                      Tim Duluth 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Tim
                                        Tim @Baron Silas Greenback last edited by

                                        @Baron-Silas-Greenback

                                        To his credit he has been anti-intervention in civil wars (especially against the recognised government) for years and right up until this week. It was a position that I endorse, and I think that he would do well to continue with it.

                                        I do not think that taking military action against both ISIS and Assad's military is in the interest of anyone in the west.

                                        Baron Silas Greenback 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • Rancid Schnitzel
                                          Rancid Schnitzel last edited by

                                          Did Trump say that he would not get involved in Syria under any circumstances? If so, he's a massive hypocrite. On the other hand, should he do nothing?

                                          That is the conundrum represented by the cluster fuck that is Syria. There is no good versus bad. The current regime is probably preferable to the guys they're fighting, but they use chemical weapons. It would seem that any course of action will have tragic consequences.

                                          As an aside, I watched a doco on Saudia Arabia last night. Fark the middle east is a shit box.

                                          Tim 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Tim
                                            Tim @Rancid Schnitzel last edited by

                                            @Rancid-Schnitzel Military intervention is not the only option.

                                            Rancid Schnitzel 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • Baron Silas Greenback
                                              Baron Silas Greenback @Tim last edited by

                                              @Tim said in Syria:

                                              @Baron-Silas-Greenback

                                              To his credit he has been anti-intervention in civil wars (especially against the recognised government) for years and right up until this week. It was a position that I endorse, and I think that he would do well to continue with it.

                                              I do not think that taking military action against both ISIS and Assad's military is in the interest of anyone in the west.

                                              I agree in all aspects of that, but I dont have an issue with him changin his position, that doesnt make him a hypocrite. Those tweets are meaningless.
                                              If people want to criticise intervening, that is a worthy discussion, but tweets from 4-5 years ago?
                                              I would have probably preferred he didnt bomb, I am not even convinced Syria actually did the bombing.... whats in it for them?

                                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                              • Duluth
                                                Duluth @Baron Silas Greenback last edited by

                                                @Baron-Silas-Greenback

                                                It's easy to make a humanitarian argument in favour of military action. However he campaigned against this type of intervention just months ago

                                                He borrowed the America First doctrine from Buchanan and now he's ditched that and adopted an 'establishment' Republican position that he was demonising

                                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                                • NTA
                                                  NTA last edited by

                                                  I'm sure he got a stack of advice saying it was the right thing to do.

                                                  Just not sure how launching US$100M of ordnance into Syria jives with the policies @Duluth talks about.

                                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                                  • canefan
                                                    canefan last edited by

                                                    The Middle East is farked. Assad doesn't do shit unless Putin says it's OK. Putin won't allow his man to go down

                                                    NTA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                    • NTA
                                                      NTA @canefan last edited by

                                                      @canefan said in Syria:

                                                      The Middle East is farked. Assad doesn't do shit unless Putin says it's OK. Putin won't allow his man to go down

                                                      Which makes this move doubly interesting - depending entirely on who they're targeting - when Trump is Putin's rent boy.

                                                      canefan 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                      • taniwharugby
                                                        taniwharugby last edited by taniwharugby

                                                        I think Nicky Hagar should write a book about this attack, apparently people died!

                                                        especially as NZ knew about the attack prior...

                                                        •The US launched a cruise missile attack on Syrian government forces at about 12.30pm (NZT).

                                                        •The attack is in retaliation to a suspected chemical weapons attack against Syrian civilians earlier this week.
                                                        •Local Syrian governor says the missile strike resulted in deaths.
                                                        •This is the first direct attack on the Syrian government from the US.

                                                        •US allies, including NZ, were notified before the attack.
                                                        •Bill English says he supports the US action.
                                                        •59 Tomahawk missiles, fired from warships in the Mediterranean Sea, targeted a Syrian air base believed to have been connected with the suspected chemical attack.

                                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                                        • canefan
                                                          canefan @NTA last edited by

                                                          @NTA said in Syria:

                                                          @canefan said in Syria:

                                                          The Middle East is farked. Assad doesn't do shit unless Putin says it's OK. Putin won't allow his man to go down

                                                          Which makes this move doubly interesting - depending entirely on who they're targeting - when Trump is Putin's rent boy.

                                                          A missile strike is a bit more token than boots on the ground. Hell of a token though....

                                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                          • Bovidae
                                                            Bovidae last edited by

                                                            I thought the deal was that Iran was in control of Syria as they provide the majority of combat-ready soldiers on the ground (including Hezbollah and Shi’ite militia fighters).

                                                            It remains to be seen how effective this missile strike actually was. Trump warned Putin, who I'm sure warned Assad.

                                                            canefan 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                            • canefan
                                                              canefan @Bovidae last edited by

                                                              @Bovidae said in Syria:

                                                              I thought the deal was that Iran was in control of Syria as they provide the majority of combat-ready soldiers on the ground (including Hezbollah and Shi’ite militia fighters).

                                                              It remains to be seen how effective this missile strike actually was. Trump warned Putin, who I'm sure warned Assad.

                                                              The missile strike is a token but a one off attack doesn't do shit tactically

                                                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                              • NTA
                                                                NTA last edited by

                                                                Baron Silas Greenback 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 9
                                                                • Frank
                                                                  Frank last edited by Frank

                                                                  If Trump does the whole ground invasion/regime change (Iraq) thing against Russia's wishes, then I am done with him. I hate neo-cons.

                                                                  On the other hand, the whole Putin's puppet meme is being challenged severely, it contrasts with 8 years of Obama hedging and waffling, and it will send a clear message to China, Iran and North Korea.

                                                                  antipodean 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                  • Rancid Schnitzel
                                                                    Rancid Schnitzel @Tim last edited by

                                                                    @Tim said in Syria:

                                                                    @Rancid-Schnitzel Military intervention is not the only option.

                                                                    What are the other options? Do nothing or send a really strongly worded letter?

                                                                    jegga Frank Tim 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                    • jegga
                                                                      jegga @Rancid Schnitzel last edited by

                                                                      @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Syria:

                                                                      @Tim said in Syria:

                                                                      @Rancid-Schnitzel Military intervention is not the only option.

                                                                      What are the other options? Do nothing or send a really strongly worded letter?

                                                                      In bold font?

                                                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                                                      • Frank
                                                                        Frank @Rancid Schnitzel last edited by

                                                                        @Rancid-Schnitzel
                                                                        A red line you DO NOT cross.

                                                                        dogmeat 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                        • Tim
                                                                          Tim @Rancid Schnitzel last edited by

                                                                          @Rancid-Schnitzel Economic sanctions, trade blockades, seizure of assets.

                                                                          canefan JC Rancid Schnitzel H 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                          • canefan
                                                                            canefan @Tim last edited by

                                                                            @Tim said in Syria:

                                                                            @Rancid-Schnitzel Economic sanctions, trade blockades, seizure of assets.

                                                                            Asset seizure is a good idea. Easy way to fill the coffers

                                                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                            • JC
                                                                              JC @Tim last edited by

                                                                              @Tim said in Syria:

                                                                              @Rancid-Schnitzel Economic sanctions, trade blockades, seizure of assets.

                                                                              The first two can't work if Vlad holds the back door open. And vetoes any UN resolutions anyway. I don't know if Syria has many assets in the US to seize either.

                                                                              Having said that I'm not sure of the next step in a strategy that involves creating enemies of both sides.

                                                                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                              • Rancid Schnitzel
                                                                                Rancid Schnitzel @Tim last edited by

                                                                                @Tim said in Syria:

                                                                                @Rancid-Schnitzel Economic sanctions, trade blockades, seizure of assets.

                                                                                Isn't that what they did to Saddam after the first Gulf War? The question is how much that would affect the civilian population and also whether it would actually bring down the regime/lead to reforms in the long term. It's not like the regime has no other allies.

                                                                                There are no good options in this situation, just ones that may be less catastrophic.

                                                                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                                • Baron Silas Greenback
                                                                                  Baron Silas Greenback @NTA last edited by Baron Silas Greenback

                                                                                  @NTA said in Syria:

                                                                                  Well he cant do worse than a Baskin Robbins ice cream server like Obama. What makes a fast food worker qualified to run foreign policy?

                                                                                  One News still refers to him as a reality TV star and not the President. It is just the usual tactics to delegitimize him.

                                                                                  Catogrande NTA 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                                                                  • antipodean
                                                                                    antipodean @Frank last edited by antipodean

                                                                                    @Frank said in Syria:

                                                                                    If Trump does the whole ground invasion/regime change (Iraq) thing against Russia's wishes, then I am done with him. I hate neo-cons.

                                                                                    On the other hand, the whole Putin's puppet meme is being challenged severely, it contrasts with 8 years of Obama hedging and waffling, and it will send a clear message to China, Iran and North Korea.

                                                                                    It does nothing of the sort. He's commenced a missile strike against a regime utterly incapable of striking back. He even went to the trouble of advising all and sundry that he was going to conduct the strike. There would have been clarity sought and provided that the intended target had no Russian resources in attendance.

                                                                                    Obama's been bombing the shit out of the Middle East for the term of his presidency and nothing's changed.

                                                                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                                                                    • First post
                                                                                      Last post