@gollum said in Spinoff Article about Chris Rattue:
@Pot-Hale said in Spinoff Article about Chris Rattue:
@gollum said in Spinoff Article about Chris Rattue:
@Pot-Hale said in Spinoff Article about Chris Rattue:
Really? Really??
I don't know where to start with that appalling comparison. It's just plain offensive. And wrong.
I mean you often look at people & think "I wonder why they are / how they got where they are / why they have the attitude they have?"
And then they start on their backstory & you go "OK, there it is"
So porn stars for example tend to go "well my uncle touched me a lot" (Jenna Jamiesons backstory is grim as feck). And its explain a lot re how they got into the business.
And a hugely chip on shoulder, rage against everyone, everyone is wrong except him, must be published & heard writer came from no money, grew up poor, didn't have a telly, was put up for adoption & never knew why & has been unable to track down his birth mother & it rankles him.
I wasn't actually directly comparing the adopted or those raised on welfare to porn stars.
No - your comparison was Rattue writes contentious, sometimes bitter articles due to his poverty-led and adoptive upbringing in the same way that porn stars in general perform 'triple anal' today because they were sexually molested as children.
Oh yeah, 100%. Sorry if that offends obv.. but you are right, thats my contention.
Was intrigued by your theory/hpothesis/contention and found this:
The Main Difference Between Porn Actresses and Other Women
Hint: It has nothing to do with a history of sexual abuse.
Hint: It has nothing to do with a history of sexual trauma.
Griffith, JD. et al. “Pornography Actresses: As Assessment of the ‘Damaged Goods’ Hypothesis,” Journal of Sex Research (2013) 50:621.