Planes
-
-
-
@jegga Sea fury is a fcking beast. Love them second only to the Mosquito for me - well a couple of others too.
Was at this display:
Sadly I don't think that we have one in NZ anymore. Incredible that they competed against jets (Mig 15 IIRC) in the Korean war, and were at the bay of pigs as well. 1960s. Owesome.
-
@jegga I know about Sky raiders because of this:
Cathay Pacific VR-HEU incident
On 26 July 1954, two Douglas Skyraiders from the aircraft carriers USS Philippine Sea and Hornet shot down two Chinese PLAAF Lavochkin fighters off the coast of Hainan Island while searching for survivors after the shooting down of a Cathay Pacific Douglas DC-4 Skymaster airliner three days previously.[15][16][17].If you don't know about it:
-
@jegga I know about Sky raiders because of this:
Cathay Pacific VR-HEU incident
On 26 July 1954, two Douglas Skyraiders from the aircraft carriers USS Philippine Sea and Hornet shot down two Chinese PLAAF Lavochkin fighters off the coast of Hainan Island while searching for survivors after the shooting down of a Cathay Pacific Douglas DC-4 Skymaster airliner three days previously.[15][16][17].If you don't know about it:
They show up in Vietnam movies a lot . They could carry a load of gear for a single engined plane .
Those Chinese pilots must have been pretty inexperienced, Skyraiders weren’t exactly known as a dog fighter .
-
@jegga That's quite some story and I had never heard of it. Likely that we will never know the truth - again. Gotta love a conspiracy - some of them might be correct too.
In 2005, one U.N. official claimed that when he had examined the Secretary General’s body in the morgue, there was a suspicious wound that could have been a bullet hole in his head. The wound is not visible in any of the post-mortem photographs, although there is evidence that some of these photos were airbrushed or deliberately angled to hide the supposed bullet hole.
-
-
@jegga Sea fury is a fcking beast. Love them second only to the Mosquito for me - well a couple of others too.
Was at this display:
Sadly I don't think that we have one in NZ anymore. Incredible that they competed against jets (Mig 15 IIRC) in the Korean war, and were at the bay of pigs as well. 1960s. Owesome.
Missed this post, yeah they are very cool. The poms took a while to realise radials were the way to go in a carrier aircraft. The griffon engined spitfires were supposed to be brutal things to fly, I think thats the version Tim Wallis crashed in .
The final evolution of the spitfire was the spiteful , looked cool but they cancelled it and incorporated some design element into the last spitfire. Check out the undercarriage, way wider than the narrow track of the spitfire and me 109
-
-
@jegga Oh and Tim crashed twice from memory. Ran out of fuel in the first one, the second one was the serious one on landing.
A pilot told me the Griffon was quite different to the merlin to fly and he must have mentally switched into Merlin landing mode and the Griffon owned him.
-
The griffon engined spitfires were supposed to be brutal things to fly,
Actually most of those high powered late WW2 things were. That amount of thrust and asymmetric power rotating around a tail tragger required some skill.
What was the deal with contra rotating propellors? The last spits had them , was that to try and minimise the effects of the increased power?
-
A pilot told me the Griffon was quite different to the merlin to fly and he must have mentally switched into Merlin landing mode and the Griffon owned him.
Yeah I had heard that too.
What was the deal with contra rotating propellors? The last spits had them , was that to try and minimise the effects of the increased power?
Yes. Torque effect and a spiral of airflow around the fuse.
There is also an aerodynamic affect when you lift the tail in a dragger (name escapes me right now). It is a balance to apply power and maintain directional control. Not enough power you don't get airborne, too much and the thing can flip on it's back.Fun ay.
-
@Snowy Yeah contra rotating still exist in helis, either twin hub rotor like Chinook or single hub like the Ka-50, though for slightly different but similar reasons. Ka-50 is the only heli with an ejection sat that I know of, which was always a joke when I was a kid like waterproof teabag or chocolate fireguard. They're not allowed to fly in most countries as when the handle is pulled the rotor head detonates and the blades fly off - as you can imagine that would be pretty catestrophic anywhere near people!
Early jets, even into Hawk T1s, had noticeable delay on jet engine reactions. One of my mates had the joy, when landing solo as a stude to blow a tyre. He probably had the tow brake engaged but they could never prove it! So he instictively slammed the throttle to full (jet started winding up) realised the drill was to go idle and com,plete the landing. So he went to idle but jet was still winding up, and started to wind down. End of the runway was coming up, he was obviously rather stressed and this was very short time frame, so he changed his mind again to take off (I think, I can't remember if he thought the engine was not responsive) Anyway he slammed the throttle forward, thought he was going to crash so ejected. The engine going full bore and without the weight of the seat meant he had the horrifying moment of coming to after the ejection, in his chute, with the hawk taking off and flying away without him. Thankfully it did a slow roll and ended up plowing into the ground. Worst moment of his life.
Now flies around the world as a private jet pilot, little do they know!
-
Have any of you read/listened to this?
Last year my father was given a copy of his memoirs/diary from a work colleague so I took the chance to read it too. That document listed all of the airfields he had landed/taken off from as well as the planes he had flown (also in this link), not to mention the war stories. There was also a section about the VIPs he had flown during the war.