Orlando shooting + terrorism thread
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Baron Silas Greenback" data-cid="593364" data-time="1467365879"><p>
This was such a good post, they had to move the goal posts and revert to plan B.. talk about Christianity and how bad that was.</p></blockquote>
You are delusional. Pretty much everybody complimented the post. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="593379" data-time="1467368739">
<div>
<p>You are delusional. Pretty much everybody complimented the post.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Yes... and then you moved the goal post to all religion. So predictable.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="593378" data-time="1467368481">
<div>
<p>As opposed to you sticking with your constant refrain of apologist eh.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Oh so now you get annoyed about pejorative terms? Maybe if you hadnt decided to make this thread about posters and not about the topic (post 78) . Maybe if you had not started throwing around the term bigot ... then I would have refrained from stating the apologist left wing regressive that you are?</p>
<p>That is the problem with regressives, they love to kick off the insults.. and then play the victim.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And lets not forget you just completely made up a false narrative to argue against. What was that about delusional again?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A reminder of your delusions</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">you cross the line between attacking the doctrine and the people more often than not, you frequently make blanket statements on muslims
<p> </p>
</blockquote> -
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Baron Silas Greenback" data-cid="593423" data-time="1467415721">
<div>
<p>Yes... and then you moved the goal post to all religion. So predictable.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>moved what goal posts? with other people and other posts, NQ's for example, it is a discussion with multiple points of view. that was a good post, there were interesting and valid points in it, acknowledged by various people, who then also added their own points and discussed aspects of it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>as opposed to with you, where it is all name-calling and ranting and no actual points.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Baron Silas Greenback" data-cid="593424" data-time="1467415892">
<div>
<p>Oh so now you get annoyed about pejorative terms? Maybe if you hadnt decided to make this thread about posters and not about the topic (post 78) . Maybe if you had not started throwing around the term bigot ... then I would have refrained from stating the apologist left wing regressive that you are?</p>
<p>That is the problem with regressives, they love to kick off the insults.. and then play the victim.</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>nope, i'm still not annoyed - not sure why you keep thinking i am. also sure as shit not a victim. just, once again, pointing out your hypocrisy. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>ranting and name-calling is how you approach everything, and trying to claim that you wouldn't have 'but he started it' it is pretty funny - if <em>maybe</em> a touch childish.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="593431" data-time="1467418882">
<div>
<p>moved what goal posts? with other people and other posts, NQ's for example, it is a discussion with multiple points of view. that was a good post, there were interesting and valid points in it, acknowledged by various people, who then also added their own points and discussed aspects of it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>as opposed to with you, where it is all name-calling and ranting and no actual points.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I will be happy to answer, once you admit your false narrative and made up bullshit. or at least actually answer my query for proof of your assertion.</p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">
<p> </p>
<p><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;font-size:12px;background-color:rgb(247,247,247);">you cross the line between attacking the doctrine and the people more often than not, you frequently make blanket statements on muslims</span></p>
<p> </p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I know it is the usual regressive left way to throw out false narratives and accusations and just hope they dont get called on them.. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I made a point, and unlike you it was actually about a topic and not a poster. You then decided to started yelling bigot!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You don't have to agree with the point, but it was incredibly illustrative that in response, you didn't attack the point, you attacked me. And then you have the cheek to accuse me of name calling.. .. you think you should be allowed to use pejorative terms and nobody else?.. or just your regressive left mates? And then you call me a hypocrite.. lol</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="593432" data-time="1467419275">
<div>
<p>nope, i'm still not annoyed - not sure why you keep thinking i am. also sure as shit not a victim. just, once again, pointing out your hypocrisy. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>ranting and name-calling is how you approach everything, and trying to claim that you wouldn't have 'but he started it' it is pretty funny - if <em>maybe</em> a touch childish.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I dont think I will take advice on who is childish children from the dishonest regressive left....</p> -
<p>How about this.. you dont post about me.. and I wont post about you. Surely that would be best.. in fact it would have been good about 70 posts ago...</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Baron Silas Greenback" data-cid="593433" data-time="1467419402">
<div>
<p>I will be happy to answer, once you admit your false narrative and made up bullshit. or at least actually answer my query for proof of your assertion.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I know it is the usual regressive left way to throw out false narratives and accusations and just hope they dont get called on them.. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I made a point, and unlike you it was actually about a topic and not a poster. You then decided to started yelling bigot!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You don't have to agree with the point, but it was incredibly illustrative that in response, you didn't attack the point, you attacked me. And then you have the cheek to accuse me of name calling.. .. you think you should be allowed to use pejorative terms and nobody else?.. or just your regressive left mates? And then you call me a hypocrite.. lol</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>your point with 'poor muslims', as far as i can tell, was that you didn't feel sorry for normal peaceful muslims living in a western democracy who were being mistreated. you lumped them in with terrorists - the implication was clear: why should i feel sorry for these muslims when other muslims are shooting at / bombing 'our' people. that is bigotry. i'm sorry, but i just don't have a nicer word for it - it isn't name-calling, it's simply descriptive.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>this is not the first time i have explained this, but you can keep saying that i haven't addressed the point if you like.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>again, i haven't 'yelled' anything. i'm as calm as can be - i think the things you say are wrong, and i'm not going to stop pointing that out and calling them what they are. letting it go unchallenged would be tantamount to accepting your narrative, which i'm not going to do.</p> -
<p>I didnt say you had to accept what I have to say. What I am saying is dont make shit up that I never said, that is just dishonest and invalidates your argument, and not tomention the fact you started out just attacking me and not bringing anything to the table otherwise, then when challenged about your lies.. you just double down.. before then playing the victim. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And I could continue being descriptive of what I think you are a regressive Islamic apologist who puts appeasement ahead of common sense. Oh.. I am not calling names... I am simply being descriptive apparently.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And you are correct I don't think some hurty words is anywhere near as bad as people being murdered. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And you havent addressed anything about your stupid assertion, I keep quoting it to you... and you still don't reply... why? Because you know it is bullshit. Shall I quote it again for you?</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">you cross the line between attacking the doctrine and the people more often than not, you frequently make blanket statements on muslims
<p> </p>
</blockquote> -
<p>you keep quoting that, and it confuses me: do you seriously not understand how your initial post was not attacking the doctrine, but rather attacking muslims as a people? i explained it in the post immediately above.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>something being not as bad as something else does not make it okay. again, i have said this already.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>what you said is, by definition, bigotry, i've explained that. if you can tell me what it is that i have said that you think is regressive, please do. if you can tell me what you think i am apologising for, please do.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>seems like you're a have the last word kind of fella eh?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="593452" data-time="1467434973">
<div>
<p>you keep quoting that, and it confuses me: do you seriously not understand how your initial post was not attacking the doctrine, but rather attacking muslims as a people? i explained it in the post immediately above.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>something being not as bad as something else does not make it okay. again, i have said this already.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>what you said is, by definition, bigotry, i've explained that. if you can tell me what it is that i have said that you think is regressive, please do. if you can tell me what you think i am apologising for, please do.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>seems like you're a have the last word kind of fella eh?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Well you had the first word about me so I think it is only fair if I have the last word about you... but you clearly want to just have the last word aye... otherwise you woould have stopped posting about 50 posts ago... but of course as a regressive left that would not make sense... your cloak of sanctimony makes it impossible. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I dont think you are apologising for anything. I think you should apologise for just making stuff up. But of course you never will.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I will spell it for you.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">you cross the line between attacking the doctrine and the people more often than not,
<p> </p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Is just blatantly false, and just feeds your constructed narrative. You have managed to come up with one supposed example. Do you know what 'more often than not' means? Shall we have a competition.. lets settle it once and for all. I will post examples of where I criticise ideology of Islam and you post where I criticize Muslims. Loser runs out of examples first.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Whoever loses stops posting here.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Deal?</p> -
<p>I will start... seems fair.. and just from this thread..</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">
<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">It is an Islam thing. Lets assume that the guy was homosexual, his religion told him to hate and murder gays. When the guy was already fucked in the head, following a religion that hates homosexuals and wants them all dead.. that is an issue.</p>
<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">Not being fucked in the head would have helped.. not following a hateful religion would have helped.</p>
<p> </p>
</blockquote> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Baron Silas Greenback" data-cid="593453" data-time="1467435488">
<div>
<p>Well you had the first word about me so I think it is only fair if I have the last word about you... but you clearly want to just have the last word aye... otherwise you woould have stopped posting about 50 posts ago... but of course as a regressive left that would not make sense... your cloak of sanctimony makes it impossible. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I dont think you are apologising for anything. I think you should apologise for just making stuff up. But of course you never will.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I will spell it for you.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Is just blatantly false, and just feeds your constructed narrative. You have managed to come up with one supposed example. Do you know what 'more often than not' means? Shall we have a competition.. lets settle it once and for all. I will post examples of where I criticise ideology of Islam and you post where I criticize Muslims. Loser runs out of examples first.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Whoever loses stops posting here.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Deal?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>if i'm not apologising for anything, how can i be an apologist? if you're not sure what they mean, you should stop parroting these phrases: islam apologist, regressive left, cloak of sanctimony etc, and try thinking for yourself.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>does this proposed competition mean that you are now accepting that your initial post was bigotry, attacking muslim people in general as opposed to the doctrine?</p>
<p>you want to turn it into a percentage of posts game now?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="593458" data-time="1467436054">
<div>
<p> </p>
<p>does this proposed competition mean that you are now accepting that your initial post was bigotry, attacking muslim people in general as opposed to the doctrine?</p>
<p>you want to turn it into a percentage of posts game now?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Wow.. you comprehension is incredibly shite. But just for you.. no.. I am not admitting any such thing. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>It is about pointing out that like another Islamic apologists you just make stuff up about what other say to suit your narrative. You dont care about what people actually say,. you jjst care that they dont agree with you, u get frustrated at your inability to actually form an argument on what they say, so you invent stuff.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now .. you going to take that bet?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Baron Silas Greenback" data-cid="593459" data-time="1467436338">
<div>
<p>Wow.. you comprehension is incredibly shite. But just for you.. no.. I am not admitting any such thing. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>It is about pointing out that like another Islamic apologists you just make stuff up about what other say to suit your narrative. You dont care about what people actually say,. you jjst care that they dont agree with you, u get frustrated at your inability to actually form an argument on what they say, so you invent stuff.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now .. you going to take that bet?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>i could do with a bit of help with my comprehension actually.... apologists don't apologise, but they do make stuff up... why wouldn't you just call them liars?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>am i going to play a game in which the loser stops posting here? i don't really know how to respond to that, given that you didn't like it when i called you childish last time.</p> -
<p>This should kick off a couple more pages</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/'>http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/</a></p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="593462" data-time="1467437790">
<div>
<p>i could do with a bit of help with my comprehension actually.... apologists don't apologise, but they do make stuff up... why wouldn't you just call them liars?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>am i going to play a game in which the loser stops posting here? i don't really know how to respond to that, given that you didn't like it when i called you childish last time.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>No, it is actually more about proving how full of shit you actually are.</p>