• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

A Global Season?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
64 Posts 17 Posters 2.0k Views
A Global Season?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #52

    @Machpants said in A Global Season?:

    @nzzp said in A Global Season?:

    . Of course, it dis-incentivise clubs to have internationals, as they will come back a bit jaded compared to the domestic players who just keep training fit through the break.

    It is less of a disincentive than not having those players during the international games, like it currently is

    'not having' or 'leaning on the international fringe players to not be eligible'.

    I think that this is really good for the strength of international rugby - leaves decent windows for selecting players from all over the world, with travel time etc. Could de-power domestic leagues though (well, NZ and Aus are probably the only two left who won't select overseas players)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #53

    @nzzp said in A Global Season?:

    So, I don't like it. But I think I probably like it slightly more than the status quo. I don't like two short offseasons, but again that ship has sailed I suspect.

    I think we all acknowledge that there will need to be compromise between the hemispheres to make this work. My problem is that McGeechan's proposal is based on the European club season, which is very different to what happens south of the equator at present.

    If, for example, SR finishes before the July/August rest period, any AB player won't be playing at all until the next international window in October unless they participate initially in the M10 Cup. Great if they are, but unlikely. Then you stop a domestic competition for an international window in October/November when those (semi-professional) NPC players wouldn't be involved in that anyway. I don't think there is an easy solution and from a NZ perspective it will depend on how important the M10 Cup is to NZR.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    Looking at Geech’s, we could have M10 before first window, late summer. ABs picked off previous years work, can play some M10 games if necessary, otherwise a decent camp for ABs to start the year, maybe a prob vs poss game or two >Rugby Champs>SR into the rest because we rest/camp leading upto >Oct Nov tours

    nzzpN BovidaeB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #55

    @Machpants yeah,

    wonder even if we just do Super after the RC in March/April. So it runs May, June, July, August (skip the rest), and then 6 weeks before teh October Test window opens.

    Split out the M10 cup as a proper semipro/amateur comp, and run it late August/Sept and finish early October. I guess Club then runs May-July in parallel with Super.

    This would give a big offseason (December-Feb), but has the disadvantage of All Blacks coming into both windows without meaningful competition for a month or three.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #56

    @Machpants And club rugby? Most M10 Cup squads are picked from that player pool. I think the club season would need to run at the same time as SR in the future.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #57

    @Bovidae said in A Global Season?:

    @Machpants And club rugby? Most M10 Cup squads are picked from that player pool. I think the club season would need to run at the same time as SR in the future.

    yeah good point...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    The original article is behind a paywall.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/121827401/european-clubs-to-scupper-plans-for-global-season--report

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #59

    @Bovidae Well Monsieur Goze comes across as an idiot, and a bell end to boot.

    The Tour de France is in September. The summer Olympics are every 4 years and January in France is traditionally winter. As for ticket sales I guess all of the French will be too busy watching cricket in spring.

    He just doesn't want international rugby to dominate the club game - which it should. The best players, with the best refs, at the right time of year.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    Here's the original interview with AFP in French:

    https://www.afp.com/fr/infos/335/rugby-paul-goze-veut-des-evolutions-pas-une-revolution-sur-le-calendrier-doc-1tc1lh1

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #61

    @Snowy Yep, agree with that (except that the French will be watching cricket).

    I won't be surprised if the European club owners and the EPCR spoil it for everyone else, again. Pure protectionism.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #62

    @Stargazer said in A Global Season?:

    except that the French will be watching cricket

    Wasn't entirely serious about that, my levels of cynicism can be quite high, although the French cut was one of my best shots.

    Yes it is protectionism, to the detriment of the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #63

    World Rugby welcomes commitment to further global calendar dialogue

    World Rugby welcomes commitment between the game's major stakeholders for further dialogue regarding potential adjustments to the global international calendar.

    Whilst not a decision-making forum, today’s World Rugby Professional Game Forum provided the initial platform for national unions, international and professional club competitions and players to exchange frank views and consider immediate and long-term calendar reform in line with the guiding core principles of recognising the needs of the international and domestic game and enhancing player welfare.

    With the global COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacting the 2020 rugby calendar and union and club finances, all parties recognised the need to agree a compromise solution that enables both disrupted professional club and international competitions to be completed this year.

    In the absence of full alignment, further information sharing and discussion will be undertaken with all parties regarding the viability of proposed adjustments to the 2020 international release weekends stipulated in Regulation 9 that will enable postponed and other international matches to be played in an adjusted window from October, whilst enabling the completion of existing club competitions. The final decision on 2020 will be confirmed by vote of the World Rugby Council on 30 June following consideration and recommendation by the World Rugby Executive Committee.

    There was also commitment to further detailed commercial and player welfare modelling in full collaboration with the club game to better assess the viability and attractiveness, for all parties, of a potential new ongoing global release period of October/November from 2021, replacing the July window.

    All stakeholders believe that meaningful reform of the international calendar is necessary in a much-changed post COVID-19 environment to revitalise the global game and deliver much-needed alignment between international and club rugby with fewer overlaps and enhanced player rest periods.

    Crucially, if managed appropriately, the proposed long-term calendar reform will enable meaningful pathways for emerging nations on a global and regional scale and the development of a global international women’s competition model with defined windows that do not overlap with the men’s competitions.

    World Rugby Professional Game Forum attendees: World Rugby, The Six Nations, SANZAAR, International Rugby Players, British and Irish Lions, EPCR, PRO 14, LNR, PRL, Top League and Professional Game Committee unions: Argentina, Australia, England, Fiji, France, Japan, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Scotland, South Africa and Wales.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by Machpants
    #64

    @Stargazer said in A Global Season?:

    World Rugby Professional Game Forum attendees: World Rugby, The Six Nations, SANZAAR, International Rugby Players, British and Irish Lions, EPCR, PRO 14, LNR, PRL, Top League and Professional Game Committee unions: Argentina, Australia, England, Fiji, France, Japan, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Scotland, South Africa and Wales.

    No wonder nothing got decided, they probably didn’t get past making sure everyone’s audio was working on Zoom

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

A Global Season?
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.