@Cyclops said in Black Caps First Eleven for hall of fame.:
Nah I don't buy that. Getting all 10 just means that the rest of the bowlers were rubbish. Its a neat statistical anomaly, but doesn't change the course of a match like a triple century does. Technically the batting equivalent would be get 100% of the runs but that's vastly harder to do. Maybe make the cut off 2/3rds of the runs and you then get 2 instances in test history.
The equivalent to a triple century is a hattrick. No one is pushing for Jimmy Franklin or Peter Petherick to be included though.
I think McCullum is a fair inclusion though when you consider the whole body of work. If he'd had a career like Andy Sandham or Karun Nair I'd get it. But the second half of so of his career he was phenomenal on the pitch and a fantastic captain. The triple and the fastest ton push him over the top.
I sort of get what you mean but if you were right it would happen far more often than it does.
We all agree Hadlee was the best of his time and of all time. He got 9-52 in one innings. Amazing stuff. But in terms of other amazing performances the next best he got was a couple of 7 fers meaning the rest of the NZ bowlers ( and all his teammates were quite a few rungs below him in terms of quality ) often chipped in with a few here and there.
10 in an innings is incredible and rare.
But then your point about it not changing a match like a triple ton stands too.