I have zero interest in either the video or the 'manifesto'

I can understand trying to limit views of the video, but those who want to see it, will find it, whereas the 'manifesto' might give a bit more insight into the workings of this cnuts mind and assist those better placed to avert a future incident one way or another, but again, it is out in the internet, banning it just makes some want to see it more.

@Chris got to ask why? DO they have a blanket ban on banners?

I saw him at the NRU gym a fortnight ago and looked in good shape no visible limp or other injuries

@mikedogz @mikedogz up here if you cant field your reserves, both teams default and fined.

My son plays U14 which is under IMB now, and if we are to default and don't give 24 hours notice we are fined.

All this talk of kids at this age getting out if rugby; due to the rules, we have at least 6 or so kids who wanted to play (for us) who wont play at all this year.

We have 13 year olds at 40kg not wanting to play due to 6ft + 100kg+ 13 year olds and then a 68kg 14yr old isnt given dispensation.

Not sure what it is like elsewhere but the rules seem to contradict thier desire to keep kids in rugby.

@NTA yea think it is an anthology...I might have to add to my watch list.

Well this week will suck, BIG TIME, although prob not just for me....

@Bones yeah it was when they went to Norway and some right wing activists were involved, and the dude had got out of prison for killing a young girl.

Which was not the latest season.

@mikedogz do they get fined for that?

Up here the team supposed to be named by Thursday I think and if you dont advise of default 24 hours prior you get fined (payable to the team that didnt default)

@Bones I think the one I bailed on was when they were in Norway?

Might have to re-visit

@Steven-Harris did you get up for the game?

I see Laupepe was named at 10, assume Thoroughgood is injured? How'd Laupepe go?