-
@antipodean said in Aussie Politics:
@Siam said in Aussie Politics:
It's a "Trump" style law this deporting from Australia, I reckon. Sign up as a citizen or you won't get Aussie rights I guess is the message and objective.
Using this case, both men moved to Australia when they were 5 and have had permanent residency status since. Upon the deportation one was 31 years old and the other 40.
40 year old : "After serving part of an 18-month sentence for a domestic violence assault".
31 year old: "was sentenced to more than a year in jail for assault occasioning actual bodily harm."
Seems a bit foul to wait 30 odd years to chuck your garbage over the fence to your neighbours when it suits.
And now you have to check your garbage till you know it can be chucked over the neighbour's. ๐
I always wonder if they consistently chuck the garbage to all countries of origin?
I don't have a problem with it. I don't care if they've been here for 99.999% of their lives. They've chosen not to be citizens, so they should be removed. They're guests, this decision by the HC notwithstanding.
No room for an argument that says, Australia gained from their residency (GST perhaps?) and now origin country has to foot the bill? Or even, origin country had no input to the guy being a criminal.?
I'm also not fussed by the law but it does raise responsibility issues.
-
@Siam said in Aussie Politics:
@antipodean said in Aussie Politics:
@Siam said in Aussie Politics:
It's a "Trump" style law this deporting from Australia, I reckon. Sign up as a citizen or you won't get Aussie rights I guess is the message and objective.
Using this case, both men moved to Australia when they were 5 and have had permanent residency status since. Upon the deportation one was 31 years old and the other 40.
40 year old : "After serving part of an 18-month sentence for a domestic violence assault".
31 year old: "was sentenced to more than a year in jail for assault occasioning actual bodily harm."
Seems a bit foul to wait 30 odd years to chuck your garbage over the fence to your neighbours when it suits.
And now you have to check your garbage till you know it can be chucked over the neighbour's. ๐
I always wonder if they consistently chuck the garbage to all countries of origin?
I don't have a problem with it. I don't care if they've been here for 99.999% of their lives. They've chosen not to be citizens, so they should be removed. They're guests, this decision by the HC notwithstanding.
No room for an argument that says, Australia gained from their residency (GST perhaps?) and now origin country has to foot the bill? Or even, origin country had no input to the guy being a criminal.?
I'm also not fussed by the law but it does raise responsibility issues.
London to a brick neither of these guys were net contributors. It's the simplest test to administer: If you're not a citizen, you've worn out your welcome.
-
You can't stop progress!
https://m.themorningbulletin.com.au/news/parent-fury-as-primary-school-bans-cupcakes/3943752/
-
@Rembrandt said in Aussie Politics:
You can't stop progress!
https://m.themorningbulletin.com.au/news/parent-fury-as-primary-school-bans-cupcakes/3943752/
I don't recall celebrating my birthday at school.
-
-
I can't read either article, cos fuck the Guardian, and I'm not paying for the Australian. But, it sounds like ridiculousness from UQ.
However, as someone who works at one, university staff are finding it hard going too - many students simply do not care and as the profit motive grows with user pays, the ability of institutions to guide students towards and through critical reasoned thinking is getting harder and harder. So, it's not great, but it follows society - look at what (and who) is valued in society, and then try to come at 19 year-olds with deductive and inductive reasoning and counter argument techniques, and see where that gets you.
I'd add that university administrators and university staff are (generally) very different too. One problem is that educators and researchers generally want to avoid administration and focus on education, while administrators are focused on spin, student numbers, and the avoidance of any risk. Again, that follows society.
Sorry for the diversion.
Anyway, why universities are trying to limit debate about this issue is beyond me.
-
Sorry, I should have put in a sarcasm sign.
I recently just lost an opportunity to apply for my dream job there due to Covid - it was opened then taken off the market as the entire system is dependent on Chinese students.
Apparently, it won't come back up for years.
-
Yeah, Iโve been wondering about the security for those positions. It was full-time but I donโt know at what point tenure is secured for new hires (usually 6 month review I think my friend said at the lecturer/senior lecturer level, but that could be school dependent).
Iโm certainly not giving up my tenure here lightly; I was pretty happy to go elsewhere but I imagine there will be extensive cuts at places for quite a while, so weโll wait for a bit.
-
@Tim said in Aussie Politics:
@gt12 said in Aussie Politics:
Anyway, why universities are trying to limit debate about this issue is beyond me.
$$$
UQ has about 11k students from China, and a Confucius institute.
It's terrible doing postgrad work with classes that are almost entirely foreign students. The pretence of competency in English no longer exists - somehow they're able to do the coursework without being able to speak, read or write.
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Politics:
The pretence of competency in English no longer exists - somehow they're able to do the coursework without being able to speak, read or write.
We struggled with this when hiring grads. For some people, the ability to communicate wasn't a big deal apparently. How do we deal with english as a second language, but still get diversity so we're not monocultural. It doesn't help that if we write poorly, we potentially get sued.
-
@gt12 said in Aussie Politics:
I can't read either article, cos fuck the Guardian, and I'm not paying for the Australian. But, it sounds like ridiculousness from UQ.
However, as someone who works at one, university staff are finding it hard going too - many students simply do not care and as the profit motive grows with user pays, the ability of institutions to guide students towards and through critical reasoned thinking is getting harder and harder. So, it's not great, but it follows society - look at what (and who) is valued in society, and then try to come at 19 year-olds with deductive and inductive reasoning and counter argument techniques, and see where that gets you.
I'd add that university administrators and university staff are (generally) very different too. One problem is that educators and researchers generally want to avoid administration and focus on education, while administrators are focused on spin, student numbers, and the avoidance of any risk. Again, that follows society.
Sorry for the diversion.
Anyway, why universities are trying to limit debate about this issue is beyond me.
Disagree.
Universities the world over have introduced identity politics and censorship to society for a long time.
Evergreen uni
Jordan Peterson
Gad Saad
Peter Borgosian
Safe spaces
Trigger warnings
Berkeley riots of Milo
Massey university and Don Brash
Gender studies
White privilege
Diversity doctrinesFor those of us aghast at the weak principles of progressiveness, we sought the origin for such a facile ideology and universities come up time and again.
Your claim is like saying Google follows society.
-
I remember back in the 90s we had foreign students at our rural campus and it was the first time I'd met a lot of nationalities and religions. There was a Sri Lankan guy in particular who stuck to me like glue during one of the Geoscience subjects, because he explained how much it was costing him to attend and how his family couldn't really afford to fuck up.
The thing is, he had no feel for it. He was just doing it to get the piece of paper, so it was a punish to try and backfill his knowledge. No idea what grade he got, but mine was pleasing from memory.
When I worked at Sydney Uni in the early 2000s the amount of Chinese students was eye opening - the finance/economics faculty was just completing their brand new computer lab and quite proud of the balance of foreign money coming in.
Not sure how, in that environment, you can accurately evaluate critical thinking - they're just going to re-hash what you want to here in order to get the marks.
At the same time, I think romanticising about universities of days past is a little dangerous - universities tend to be a reflection of the society at the time. Let's not pretend that the boomers who went to Uni in the 60s and 70s are still the same free-love-hippie pot heads.
-
@NTA said in Aussie Politics:
@Siam said in Aussie Politics:
Berkeley riots of Milo
Which is the most interesting / funny one from the pov that Milo is a fucking clown and stood for nothing but his own promotion.
I agree mate, but there's a principle at play. I like your former deputy pm, John Anderson. He talks about a shift from principles in politics to middle management ( expedient measures to placate) these days and I think he talks sense
-
@Siam said in Aussie Politics:
@NTA said in Aussie Politics:
@Siam said in Aussie Politics:
Berkeley riots of Milo
Which is the most interesting / funny one from the pov that Milo is a fucking clown and stood for nothing but his own promotion.
I agree mate, but there's a principle at play. I like your former deputy pm, John Anderson. He talks about a shift from principles in politics to middle management ( expedient measures to placate) these days and I think he talks sense
The political class has definitely become more adept at politicking for the sake of it.
I think anyone looking at State or Federal politics in Australia for the last decade would see much more than wasted opportunities and infighting.
-
I'm not here to debate identity politics in another thread. I'm totally fucking over that in this place.
I hope you'll notice that I pointed out the gap between staff and administrators in my original post.
My point was that in an instagram age young people are confronted by the image that where being hot, rude, naked, obnoxious, or otherwise will get you further than being being smart and well read. As a result, if you are educator, you've already got some barriers to break down.
It's also worth noting that the fightback to many of those IP ideas has come from teaching and research staff in universities (e.g., Jordan Peterson), which goes to my original point that many of these changes make things harder for university staff (rather than administrators who have been right in the middle of driving some of these bad things, such as identity politics, in some places).
Finally, I'd add that Identity politics doesn't feature very strongly at all in my teaching context. People get diversity, are kind to others, call someone what they want to be called by (it's never happened to me btw) and it works well - the ridiculousness from, primarily US liberal arts Unis is almost entirely absent from my Japanese liberal arts university.
So, when I say that we are finding it hard, I'm not talking about kids protesting to me about safe spaces; I'm talking about kids who only want to surf the gram and send nudes, and don't care that they are dumb and couldn't give a fuck about the tens of thousands of dollars that their parents are paying for their education.
Identity politics is not the defining feature of every discussion, on every thread, everywhere.
Aussie Politics