Radio Sport
-
Market research - What did you like about Radio Sport and what didn't you like about Radio Sport?
What would you want to see from an online streaming station if it were to setup to fill the void???
-
@DrivingMaul said in Radio Sport:
Market research - What did you like about Radio Sport and what didn't you like about Radio Sport?
What would you want to see from an online streaming station if it were to setup to fill the void???
I liked the morning show and Daniel McHardy in the early PM slot. I always found Jason Pyne to be desperate not to offend and extremely averse to expressing a strong opinion. Weak sauce as an interviewer especially. And don't start me on Devlin FFS. I also enjoyed the 2GB league banter with Piggy etc on the weekends. And of course cricket comms.
-
I'm actually quite sad. Dedicated sports stations were excellent.
In response to @DrivingMaul about what was good, it was decent analysis and insight you didn't get otherwise. That, to me, was often through informed callers.
However, the quality of the broadcasters dropped off with time. Graeme Hill was probably their GOAT, and I found early Devlin to be outstanding. Telfer was annoying but actually knew about a bunch of sports, and Nathan Rarere more recently had life experience.
D'Arcy was quality.
However, the number of announcers only interested in people agreeing with their opinion and cutting off differnet opinions kind of rose. Willie Lose, Doug Golightly, that evening bloke (Mark?) ... I stopped listening as much as I used to.
-
Starting tomorrow morning we'll be producing a morning Sports News Show. Initially it will be broadcast on Facebook and the recording put out as a podcast.
For tomorrow we'll host it on my DrivingMaul channel but this show won't be rugby centric and we'll be setting up new pages etc... for the channel.
The idea is that over time we will add in other shows to grow the content out to be an online NZ focused Sports Radio Channel. We have a number of ideas how this will look and I'm sure that vision will evolve over time.
Any suggestions or thoughts would be much appreciated.
-
-
-
@Donsteppa maybe another service can be stood up in its place without the legacy overheads of studios and things?
One thing this crisis has taught us is that radio broadcasting can be done remotely, it doesn't need fancy studios
-
I'm super disappointed.
My thoughts on the good and bad.
Firstly, one man's trash is another man's treasure.
Already on this thread I've seen some suggest an announcer I quite liked, they hated with a passion. You'll get that.
Anyway, I still tuned in over on the left side of the deetch when I could (their Week on Demand recordings got me through many morning exercise sessions, and weekend gardening efforts). It gave me a direct connection to the sport I was still connected with over there. More so than over here.
So random thoughts that I may add to or amend.
- I generally enjoyed their breakfast shows. Devlin in particular.
Devlin's rants could piss me off when I disagreed with him but I generally enjoyed him.
I know many of you disliked Veitch. I coukd park the reputation, and again generally (not always) enjoyed the show. His weekend afternoon's got a bit formulaic but meh (tried too hard to repeat and repeat and repeat his points).
Mulligan was was quite good and was the highlight of the brekkie shows featuring him, Richardson and Doull.
Nate Rarere ( @Gibbit ) was fun, and KJ and Peers played good straight guys to him recently.
- I miss the longer interviews.
Telfer did this really well and I think they suffered through getting rid of him. He'd spend a whole hour (less ads and news) interviewing a sportsman or author. They haven't done this recently and I think that's been to their detriment.
Veitch could and did the longer interviews well.
- Announcers I didn't like:
Lose. Thought he was dumb. Would try and take a contrary position to try and generate controversy but really couldn't sustain a logical argument.
Watson. Hated rugby particularly and team ball sports generally. Was a hard listen because of that anger. Would yell over the top of anyone who had a vaguely different opinion.
Golightly, similar. Kind of seemed to hate sport and would not buy into any disagreement.
There'sprobably more.
- Guys who were okish, somewhere between "I kinda liked" and "I didn't really dislike":
Graham Hill. He was at least entertaining.
Phil Gifford. Knew his sport, if at times I found that he struggled to articulate his message.
Waldegrave. Wasn't someone I went out of my way to listen to. No offence to Darcy. Just usually by the time I had listened to the preceding broadcasts in a day it was time to pack it in.
Dewhurst. Ok. Too much soccer.
Larmer. Never warmed to his delivery.
Pine. Ok but found him a bit bland.
McCardy. See Pine.
- The upshot for me on reflection and reading my own opinions above is enjoyment.
The guys who really enjoyed sport, revelled in it's history and it's fun, and we're able to convey that to the audience were the guys I liked.
Do hope they come back.
But good luck to @DrivingMaul if he can make a go of something.
-
-
Devlin and the John Mitchell era. That was the high point.
Oh and some guy called “Steve” who knows all about Northland rugby
-
@Billy-Tell said in Radio Sport:
Devlin and the John Mitchell era. That was the high point.
what do we do after a RWC loss? NewsTalk just won't be the same as Radio Sport
-
I don't like the idea of RadioSport being gone one bit - but like many my listenership definitely waned in the past decade.
The problem for me was the content became very hit and miss. Even with the presenters I enjoyed Devlin, McHardy, Pine even Watson in his day there was way too little quality control. Too often it would veer off into "here is a 45 minute interview with the head of Dodgeball New Zealand" or "Here, let me tell you how much I know about American Sports". Why they ever let Miles Davis on I'll never know? Seems like a nice enough bloke, but I doubt BBC 5 live would let a NZer bang on about the Heartland Championship nauseam during prime time slots.
Even still they always managed to push out quality content, that Ian Smith interview on Sunday being the final example.
I long for the glory days where there was domestic cricket on all summer, controversy within AB management and selection, genuine promise with the Warriors and solid line up from AM to PM.
-
The only sense of loss I feel is over ball by ball cricket - which was going anyway. I would tune in maybe once a fortnight when I could find nothing else to listen to. Generally only for a few minutes before constant ads or some inane comment would turn me and the radio off.
When it first started I was a big fan of everything except Deaker. Sadly it seems the stations owners wanted more Murray and less sport. Too many ad. I know it's a commercial station but it seemed I would always turn on and hear 3 mins of ads - one minute of the host say something like well that's been a great discussion, stay with us after the break - news coming up in 3 minutes and then we will have more on the xyz controversy.
Way too many hosts whose knowledge of sport was lamentable. It's your job - put some fucking effort in.
There were some bright spots. In the early days it was very good - but latterly too personality driven. I don't give a shit about you as a person I'm here for the sport you moron!! I have occasionally caught the Breakfast show when the car radio was still on radio sport from the previous days cricket and @gibbit seemed to do a good job of holding it all together but I never listened for more than two minutes.
Nobody's mentioned Mark Richardson - says it all.... Rigor summed up everything RS got wrong.
-
@dogmeat said in Radio Sport:
When it first started I was a big fan of everything except Deaker. Sadly it seems the stations owners wanted more Murray and less sport.
Everyone can criticize Deaker, Veitch and to a lesser extent Deviln - but it will be shame if there isn't a flagship sports talk show in NZ coming out of this (Devlin was broadcast from ZB so I have no idea if his show is running). They all had their eccentricities but that kind of comes with the gig. Leading up to a big fixture or the Sunday after a major game they always had the big name interviews and didn't give them softballs.
Also did anyone ever figure out what a Biomag was?
-
@rotated Deaker was a dick. He may have been good once, but even I'm not old enough to remember.
What I didn't like was his complete ignorance about anything other than rugby and to an extent cricket. Even with those two sports he was quite often wrong. He was the kind of mouthy git you'd avoid in the pub - except you'd never find him there of course.
