• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks XV v Japan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksxvjapan
96 Posts 24 Posters 3.9k Views
All Blacks XV v Japan
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Bell does start.

    359706697_232244679648813_7763252639005019543_n.jpg

    https://www.allblacks.com/news/all-blacks-xv-team-named-for-clash-against-brave-blossoms/

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Strangely, as soon as I read Strange, I started to worry.

    But exclude that and fuck that's a good B side (when you consider it's a C side).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    If Perofeta went off early we'd be stuck with Love or Gilbert at 1st 5.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    I think this game is on Stan for those in Aus

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Would have liked to have seen Fakatava start, but pleased to see Bell getting the nod.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #6

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks XV v Japan:

    I think this game is on Stan for those in Aus

    confirmed

    95df0786-e8ae-488e-b6d7-b3a29c0b86a0-image.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Would have preferred Fakatava and Thompson to start, especially because Bell has hardly played, this year, but at least Thompson hasn't been dumped, which I was afraid they'd do (like last year). I would also have preferred Rakete-Stones on the bench, but I guess this was always going to happen because you don't call up a player and then not give him game time and they weren't going to drop Ainsley or Ross, obviously.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    This game does overlap with the Aust-Arg test.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #9

    @Stargazer Could never guess what team you support!

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by Duluth
    #10

    Don't really see the point of playing PGS. Would've like to have seen Lio-Willie again.. or if they wanted size in the trio try Suafoa at 8

    F BovidaeB BonesB KiwiwombleK 4 Replies Last reply
    10
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #11

    @Duluth The whole thing is a little bizarre IMO... should have organised a midweek game as well, and done 3 games in 8 days if they wanted to give everyone a game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #12

    @Duluth No point selecting them (departing players) to begin with if they aren't going to play. I guess it does show the pecking order of players in each position, assuming Foster and Ryan have some input.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #13

    @Duluth said in All Blacks XV v Japan:

    Don't really see the point of playing PGS. Would've like to have seen Lio-Willie again.. or if they wanted size in the trio try Suafoa at 8

    You've got to think they're really looking hard at PGS for a world cup surprise ticket, have involved him in plans last year but don't want too much material available for opposition?

    Kudos if so, because they've clearly also been up front with him about his role.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #14

    @frugby Haha. If I'd added in my other likes or preferences it might have been less obvious, but I reckoned others would post the same thing.

    But here you go: I'm happy to see Harmon get the start; I'm unhappy that Sullivan has been dropped for Lam, who I found very disappointing this year, and Sullivan was great last week, but the same applies here: all will get a run. Nanai-Setura has similarly been dropped for Nareki.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #15

    @Duluth said in All Blacks XV v Japan:

    Don't really see the point of playing PGS. Would've like to have seen Lio-Willie again.. or if they wanted size in the trio try Suafoa at 8

    yeah, as much as i dont like it...i can understand when they pick departing players for the AB's...if theyre the clear fav in a position....but if the ABXV isn't abouta stepping stone from super to international for the next generation....im not sure whats it for

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by Stargazer
    #16

    @Kiwiwomble The ABs XV are used as the back-up pool for the ABs, in case an AB gets injured. It's a 2nd XV, not a development team.

    The games are used to keep them match fit, and - I suppose - to determine a pecking order if there isn't one already.

    M KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #17

    @Stargazer said in All Blacks XV v Japan:

    @Kiwiwomble The ABs XV are used as the back-up pool for the ABs, in case an AB gets injured. It's a 2nd XV, not a development team

    A bit of both, surely. Expose a greater number of players to international, esp now as we only play Oz

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #18

    @Machpants said in All Blacks XV v Japan:

    we only play Oz

    ?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #19

    @Stargazer said in All Blacks XV v Japan:

    @Machpants said in All Blacks XV v Japan:

    we only play Oz

    ?

    In SR, and Fiji I guess. Moana just a kiwi team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #20

    @Stargazer said in All Blacks XV v Japan:

    @Kiwiwomble The ABs XV are used as the back-up pool for the ABs, in case an AB gets injured. It's a 2nd XV, not a development team.

    The games are used to keep them match fit, and - I suppose - to determine a pecking order if there isn't one already.

    but in the case where 1st - 3rd choice in each position are off with the AB's...these guys have to be at best 3rd choice (some overlap im sure) but mostly 4th - 6th...that sounds perfect for development, feeling like saying we'd rather spend money on guys we know are leaving purely to avoid something 2011 RWC 1st 5 situation is what will piss of young guys coming through

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks XV v Japan
Rugby Matches
allblacksxvjapan
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.