Woo
-
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@jegga Science is settled on climate change and the necessity for the Paris accord. Events of late evidence that the google/youtube leadership are for the most part followers of progressive orthodoxy so they believe that Peterson's existence is fueling the rise in the alt-right and hate crimes in the US.
Not the same thing. Not even close.
-
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
-
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
-
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
If you could bioengineer a disease to target specific groups of people like for example men with man buns or people who film in portrait mode you wouldn’t get any objections out of me .
-
I bet his parents “ did their own research”.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=12207269
-
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
-
@Machpants said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
Meh, eggs, omelette. Perhaps those people, much like our anti-peanut enthusiasts, aren't supposed to be around?
-
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Machpants said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
Meh, eggs, omelette. Perhaps those people, much like our anti-peanut enthusiasts, aren't supposed to be around?
There’s a huge difference between people who are genuinely trying to make the best of a bad hand in life, compared with dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders...
-
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Machpants said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
Meh, eggs, omelette. Perhaps those people, much like our anti-peanut enthusiasts, aren't supposed to be around?
There’s a huge difference between people who are genuinely trying to make the best of a bad hand in life, compared with dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders...
Did I suggest otherwise? I certainly didn't mean to give that impression. Merely that there is an argument to be made for letting things take care of themselves on the macro scale.
-
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Machpants said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
Meh, eggs, omelette. Perhaps those people, much like our anti-peanut enthusiasts, aren't supposed to be around?
There’s a huge difference between people who are genuinely trying to make the best of a bad hand in life, compared with dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders...
Did I suggest otherwise?
It read like that to me when
“... problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity...”
Gets compared to omelette and eggs?
Edit: I see you’ve edited and elaborated on your comment since...
-
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Machpants said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
Meh, eggs, omelette. Perhaps those people, much like our anti-peanut enthusiasts, aren't supposed to be around?
There’s a huge difference between people who are genuinely trying to make the best of a bad hand in life, compared with dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders...
Did I suggest otherwise?
It read like that to me when
“... problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity...”
Gets compared to omelette and eggs?
My point has nothing to do with 'dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders'. It's about just how far are we prepared to accommodate people whose genetics would have them fall off the metaphoric cliff, weakening the herd.
-
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Machpants said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
Meh, eggs, omelette. Perhaps those people, much like our anti-peanut enthusiasts, aren't supposed to be around?
There’s a huge difference between people who are genuinely trying to make the best of a bad hand in life, compared with dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders...
Did I suggest otherwise?
It read like that to me when
“... problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity...”
Gets compared to omelette and eggs?
My point has nothing to do with 'dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders'. It's about just how far are we prepared to accommodate people whose genetics would have them fall off the metaphoric cliff, weakening the herd.
that's an interesting discussion. And, as always, it's pretty easy to see both sides.
Does your view change if it's one of your kids with the weak genetics?
-
@mariner4life said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Machpants said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
Meh, eggs, omelette. Perhaps those people, much like our anti-peanut enthusiasts, aren't supposed to be around?
There’s a huge difference between people who are genuinely trying to make the best of a bad hand in life, compared with dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders...
Did I suggest otherwise?
It read like that to me when
“... problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity...”
Gets compared to omelette and eggs?
My point has nothing to do with 'dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders'. It's about just how far are we prepared to accommodate people whose genetics would have them fall off the metaphoric cliff, weakening the herd.
that's an interesting discussion. And, as always, it's pretty easy to see both sides.
Does your view change if it's one of your kids with the weak genetics?
I've no doubt it would. The problem as I see it is twofold. Firstly you have to remove your own emotional allegiance to the argument as we're discussing the "greater good" as a principle. The second is where you draw the line from Nazi level eugenics to absolutely every dollar should be spent on making everyone live as long and best as possible.
-
@antipodean said in Woo:
@mariner4life said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Machpants said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
Meh, eggs, omelette. Perhaps those people, much like our anti-peanut enthusiasts, aren't supposed to be around?
There’s a huge difference between people who are genuinely trying to make the best of a bad hand in life, compared with dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders...
Did I suggest otherwise?
It read like that to me when
“... problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity...”
Gets compared to omelette and eggs?
My point has nothing to do with 'dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders'. It's about just how far are we prepared to accommodate people whose genetics would have them fall off the metaphoric cliff, weakening the herd.
that's an interesting discussion. And, as always, it's pretty easy to see both sides.
Does your view change if it's one of your kids with the weak genetics?
I've no doubt it would. The problem as I see it is twofold. Firstly you have to remove your own emotional allegiance to the argument as we're discussing the "greater good" as a principle. The second is where you draw the line from Nazi level eugenics to absolutely every dollar should be spent on making everyone live as long and best as possible.
indeed. As i said, it's an interesting discussion. Best had with good friends over a few drinks. I get the feeling on the internet it quickly becomes a shitfight with a heap of name calling.
I would draw the line just before ginger
-
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Machpants said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
Meh, eggs, omelette. Perhaps those people, much like our anti-peanut enthusiasts, aren't supposed to be around?
There’s a huge difference between people who are genuinely trying to make the best of a bad hand in life, compared with dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders...
Did I suggest otherwise?
It read like that to me when
“... problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity...”
Gets compared to omelette and eggs?
My point has nothing to do with 'dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders'. It's about just how far are we prepared to accommodate people whose genetics would have them fall off the metaphoric cliff, weakening the herd.
rubbish. reckon einstein dying of asthma is gonna strengthen the herd?
-
@reprobate said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Donsteppa said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Machpants said in Woo:
@antipodean said in Woo:
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@Kirwan I agree. Others in positions of power may not.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
This .
The recent measles outbreaks in Minnesota were linked to scum deliberately spreading the lie that vaccines cause autism amongst the Somalian community which lead to them not immunising .
It isn’t a free speech issue it’s a public health issue.
The stoic rationalist in me that tends towards nihilism thinks "yeah, why not? Thin the herd".
The problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity,which they don't get because *fluffybunnies
Meh, eggs, omelette. Perhaps those people, much like our anti-peanut enthusiasts, aren't supposed to be around?
There’s a huge difference between people who are genuinely trying to make the best of a bad hand in life, compared with dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders...
Did I suggest otherwise?
It read like that to me when
“... problem being the very small percentages of poor buggers who can't have the vaccine for various reasons, and rely on herd immunity...”
Gets compared to omelette and eggs?
My point has nothing to do with 'dumb-arse conspiracy theorist antivaxxers/Darwin award contenders'. It's about just how far are we prepared to accommodate people whose genetics would have them fall off the metaphoric cliff, weakening the herd.
rubbish. reckon einstein dying of asthma is gonna strengthen the herd?
-
@antipodean as humans, our value to humanity is not in, for example, 'not being allergic to peanuts'. you don't improve the human race by letting people with allergies die.
the valuable people from a human evolutionary point of view are the smart ones, which has nothing to do with the genetics you are talking about. -
@reprobate said in Woo:
@antipodean as humans, our value to humanity is not in, for example, 'not being allergic to peanuts'. you don't improve the human race by letting people with allergies die.
the valuable people from a human evolutionary point of view are the smart ones, which has nothing to do with the genetics you are talking about.Your statement ignores an entire body of evidence based science.
Speaking of genetics, it appears the humour gene is missing from your makeup too: