-
Just had a look at the planet rugby aussie politics thread, the two biggest labor supporters seem to be two haughty sanctimonious expat kiwis and their disbelief is amusing to see. I'll drop by to watch them work through the seven stages of grief . Theres a bit of anger for people voting with "their hip pocket" which is reminiscent of Laila Harre whining after the Alliance got the arse that people "voted with their heads, not with their hearts.
-
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
I think you’ll find she retired quite a while back and even when there she was just a newsreader reading someone else’s words. No editorial input.
Jumping at shadows?No, just stating facts. If you seriously think SBS isn't biased then I'm sure you believe Fox News is actually fair and balanced.
Maybe so but that is an unrelated comment to the tweet you jumped all over.
An ex SBS autocue reader posts a nasty tweet and that proves bias from the channel? Yeah right.No, it's completely fair. Her tweet totally reflects the views openly expoused by SBS. I'm sorry if that's too hard for you to swallow. What would you know about it anyway. You probably never even watched SBS.
No, it’s following your logic that I am finding hard.
I do know about SBS. I have lived in Australia and I understand they can be perceived to have a bias just (as you mention) others do.
Is it really that difficult to admit that your original post was off the mark?How was my post off the mark Crucial? SBS is know for its bias and this woman was one of the faces of SBS for decades. And why on earth do you even care?
The second question is just bizarre. This is a discussion forum and I am discussing.
As I said, I don't get your logic that an ex employee of an organisation who, during her tenure, had no editorial or direction say, is an example of organisational and editorial bias.
You clearly made a mistake in the first place, not realising she doesn't work for them anymore and are now being pig headed about it.
By all means find examples of SBS being biased and make them relevant to the discussion at hand, but this was about her nasty tweet and you joined it to an unrelated point you wanted to make
Not really. As you may have noticed, there has been an election in Australia but you're far more invested in trying to argue that SBS lady is not a symptom of their bias. Now read carefully. There has been much gnashing of teeth about the Murdoch press. I agree that they're generally shit and biased. But as that tweet from a woman who was one of the highest profile SBS employees demonstrates, there are taxpayer funded medial outlets that are just as bad if not worse. Now you can desperately try to claim that she is an outlier and in no way reflects the views of that organisation, but that would be like claiming the sky is green.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
I think you’ll find she retired quite a while back and even when there she was just a newsreader reading someone else’s words. No editorial input.
Jumping at shadows?No, just stating facts. If you seriously think SBS isn't biased then I'm sure you believe Fox News is actually fair and balanced.
Maybe so but that is an unrelated comment to the tweet you jumped all over.
An ex SBS autocue reader posts a nasty tweet and that proves bias from the channel? Yeah right.No, it's completely fair. Her tweet totally reflects the views openly expoused by SBS. I'm sorry if that's too hard for you to swallow. What would you know about it anyway. You probably never even watched SBS.
No, it’s following your logic that I am finding hard.
I do know about SBS. I have lived in Australia and I understand they can be perceived to have a bias just (as you mention) others do.
Is it really that difficult to admit that your original post was off the mark?How was my post off the mark Crucial? SBS is know for its bias and this woman was one of the faces of SBS for decades. And why on earth do you even care?
The second question is just bizarre. This is a discussion forum and I am discussing.
As I said, I don't get your logic that an ex employee of an organisation who, during her tenure, had no editorial or direction say, is an example of organisational and editorial bias.
You clearly made a mistake in the first place, not realising she doesn't work for them anymore and are now being pig headed about it.
By all means find examples of SBS being biased and make them relevant to the discussion at hand, but this was about her nasty tweet and you joined it to an unrelated point you wanted to make
Not really. As you may have noticed, there has been an election in Australia but you're far more invested in trying to argue that SBS lady is not a symptom of their bias. Now read carefully. There has been much gnashing of teeth about the Murdoch press. I agree that they're generally shit and biased. But as that tweet from a woman who was one of the highest profile SBS employees demonstrates, there are taxpayer funded medial outlets that are just as bad if not worse. Now you can desperately try to claim that she is an outlier and in no way reflects the views of that organisation, but that would be like claiming the sky is green.
At the end of the day Abbott is still a dick, and both sides of the House are probably happy that he has gone. I always thought SBS were quite impartial, will watch now and try and pick out all of this obvious bias.
-
@Nevorian said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
I think you’ll find she retired quite a while back and even when there she was just a newsreader reading someone else’s words. No editorial input.
Jumping at shadows?No, just stating facts. If you seriously think SBS isn't biased then I'm sure you believe Fox News is actually fair and balanced.
Maybe so but that is an unrelated comment to the tweet you jumped all over.
An ex SBS autocue reader posts a nasty tweet and that proves bias from the channel? Yeah right.No, it's completely fair. Her tweet totally reflects the views openly expoused by SBS. I'm sorry if that's too hard for you to swallow. What would you know about it anyway. You probably never even watched SBS.
No, it’s following your logic that I am finding hard.
I do know about SBS. I have lived in Australia and I understand they can be perceived to have a bias just (as you mention) others do.
Is it really that difficult to admit that your original post was off the mark?How was my post off the mark Crucial? SBS is know for its bias and this woman was one of the faces of SBS for decades. And why on earth do you even care?
The second question is just bizarre. This is a discussion forum and I am discussing.
As I said, I don't get your logic that an ex employee of an organisation who, during her tenure, had no editorial or direction say, is an example of organisational and editorial bias.
You clearly made a mistake in the first place, not realising she doesn't work for them anymore and are now being pig headed about it.
By all means find examples of SBS being biased and make them relevant to the discussion at hand, but this was about her nasty tweet and you joined it to an unrelated point you wanted to make
Not really. As you may have noticed, there has been an election in Australia but you're far more invested in trying to argue that SBS lady is not a symptom of their bias. Now read carefully. There has been much gnashing of teeth about the Murdoch press. I agree that they're generally shit and biased. But as that tweet from a woman who was one of the highest profile SBS employees demonstrates, there are taxpayer funded medial outlets that are just as bad if not worse. Now you can desperately try to claim that she is an outlier and in no way reflects the views of that organisation, but that would be like claiming the sky is green.
At the end of the day Abbott is still a dick, and both sides of the House are probably happy that he has gone. I always thought SBS were quite impartial, will watch now and try and pick out all of this obvious bias.
You do that. Might have to work through a few ahem "coming of age films" before you get their news content.
-
Interesting breakdown of the vote. Labor primary vote in Qld just 27.4%. Fecking around with Adani maybe not the smartest idea.
-
@Salacious-Crumb said in Aussie Politics:
Still wondering about the polling industry? Beginning to think they’re next to useless — until they can calculate and account for the effect of self-censorship in the culture.
Is it a possibility that a good % of people are fed-up with p.c. sjw lynch mob cancel-culture and won’t tell strangers what they think, not even in a confidential opinion poll? Especially in a climate where speaking your religious views can get you sacked from your job??
The only poll that matters is the one a voter answers in the voting booth.
I feel that what you say might have had a few parallels in a few other elections already, but am struggling to remember them right now
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Nevorian said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
I think you’ll find she retired quite a while back and even when there she was just a newsreader reading someone else’s words. No editorial input.
Jumping at shadows?No, just stating facts. If you seriously think SBS isn't biased then I'm sure you believe Fox News is actually fair and balanced.
Maybe so but that is an unrelated comment to the tweet you jumped all over.
An ex SBS autocue reader posts a nasty tweet and that proves bias from the channel? Yeah right.No, it's completely fair. Her tweet totally reflects the views openly expoused by SBS. I'm sorry if that's too hard for you to swallow. What would you know about it anyway. You probably never even watched SBS.
No, it’s following your logic that I am finding hard.
I do know about SBS. I have lived in Australia and I understand they can be perceived to have a bias just (as you mention) others do.
Is it really that difficult to admit that your original post was off the mark?How was my post off the mark Crucial? SBS is know for its bias and this woman was one of the faces of SBS for decades. And why on earth do you even care?
The second question is just bizarre. This is a discussion forum and I am discussing.
As I said, I don't get your logic that an ex employee of an organisation who, during her tenure, had no editorial or direction say, is an example of organisational and editorial bias.
You clearly made a mistake in the first place, not realising she doesn't work for them anymore and are now being pig headed about it.
By all means find examples of SBS being biased and make them relevant to the discussion at hand, but this was about her nasty tweet and you joined it to an unrelated point you wanted to make
Not really. As you may have noticed, there has been an election in Australia but you're far more invested in trying to argue that SBS lady is not a symptom of their bias. Now read carefully. There has been much gnashing of teeth about the Murdoch press. I agree that they're generally shit and biased. But as that tweet from a woman who was one of the highest profile SBS employees demonstrates, there are taxpayer funded medial outlets that are just as bad if not worse. Now you can desperately try to claim that she is an outlier and in no way reflects the views of that organisation, but that would be like claiming the sky is green.
At the end of the day Abbott is still a dick, and both sides of the House are probably happy that he has gone. I always thought SBS were quite impartial, will watch now and try and pick out all of this obvious bias.
You do that. Might have to work through a few ahem "coming of age films" before you get their news content.
I thought SBS was just weird manga garbage and European fuck films masquerading as art?
-
@jegga said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Nevorian said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
@Crucial said in Aussie Politics:
I think you’ll find she retired quite a while back and even when there she was just a newsreader reading someone else’s words. No editorial input.
Jumping at shadows?No, just stating facts. If you seriously think SBS isn't biased then I'm sure you believe Fox News is actually fair and balanced.
Maybe so but that is an unrelated comment to the tweet you jumped all over.
An ex SBS autocue reader posts a nasty tweet and that proves bias from the channel? Yeah right.No, it's completely fair. Her tweet totally reflects the views openly expoused by SBS. I'm sorry if that's too hard for you to swallow. What would you know about it anyway. You probably never even watched SBS.
No, it’s following your logic that I am finding hard.
I do know about SBS. I have lived in Australia and I understand they can be perceived to have a bias just (as you mention) others do.
Is it really that difficult to admit that your original post was off the mark?How was my post off the mark Crucial? SBS is know for its bias and this woman was one of the faces of SBS for decades. And why on earth do you even care?
The second question is just bizarre. This is a discussion forum and I am discussing.
As I said, I don't get your logic that an ex employee of an organisation who, during her tenure, had no editorial or direction say, is an example of organisational and editorial bias.
You clearly made a mistake in the first place, not realising she doesn't work for them anymore and are now being pig headed about it.
By all means find examples of SBS being biased and make them relevant to the discussion at hand, but this was about her nasty tweet and you joined it to an unrelated point you wanted to make
Not really. As you may have noticed, there has been an election in Australia but you're far more invested in trying to argue that SBS lady is not a symptom of their bias. Now read carefully. There has been much gnashing of teeth about the Murdoch press. I agree that they're generally shit and biased. But as that tweet from a woman who was one of the highest profile SBS employees demonstrates, there are taxpayer funded medial outlets that are just as bad if not worse. Now you can desperately try to claim that she is an outlier and in no way reflects the views of that organisation, but that would be like claiming the sky is green.
At the end of the day Abbott is still a dick, and both sides of the House are probably happy that he has gone. I always thought SBS were quite impartial, will watch now and try and pick out all of this obvious bias.
You do that. Might have to work through a few ahem "coming of age films" before you get their news content.
I thought SBS was just weird manga garbage and European fuck films masquerading as art?
Pretty much. Shit load of Vice content as well, Samantha Bee etc.
-
@Salacious-Crumb said in Aussie Politics:
Still wondering about the polling industry? Beginning to think they’re next to useless
Australia has become less homogeneous. Given the massive demographic changes in the past twenties years polling has become more challenging. Also let's not forget the vintage Newspoll is called the Two Party Preferred model and preference flow has become more strategic and complicated by independents in recent times.
Outside of Labor's (somewhat) underperformance in Victoria is there any aspect of the result that in isolation is surprising? Between Adnani and the franking credits policies almost all the Coalition overperformance is explained.
-
So the two front runners for Labor Leader are from the NSW Left. One of them states that Labor didn't have enough time to explain to the electorate how they'd all benefit from Labor's policies.
Talk about doubling down on dumb.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
Interesting breakdown of the vote. Labor primary vote in Qld just 27.4%. Fecking around with Adani maybe not the smartest idea.
Mining in Central Queensland has offered thousands of ordinary Queenslanders a quick path to 100% equity in their homes, high quality education for their children, the opportunity to investment themselves into financial independence, job certainty and so on. Much of it came as FIFO employment but some rural centres grew to offer an attractive lifestyle away from the cities.
The Beattie and Bligh governments made a fortune from royalties (most of which they wasted).
The mining communities don't have any time for people from George Street, Brisbane who know what's best for them and they treat Canberra blow ins with utter disdain.
Has been Greens poser Bob Brown took a caravan of unwashed professional protesters up through the Adani / Carmichael Mine surrounds about three weeks ago, a master stroke for the Coalition.
Local pubs and motels refused to serve them and hundreds of locals turned out to watch them, closely. They want local jobs, not over in WA, and Adani could have been employing thousands already.
They well know that Labor's Mar'n F'rsson, granted in principle approval to Adani just before he retired six years ago. That has been thwarted by Bono Pocock's li'l kindy friends ever since, because they hate Australia and Australians.
The vote tells the story clearly.
Labor copped a swing against of -3.4% in Queensland and ceded two seats to the Coalition. It already held Maranoa, in the northern coalfields, and it swung a further 6.4% (75% counted), a huge movement.
-
@Mick-Gold-Coast-QLD said in Aussie Politics:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Aussie Politics:
Interesting breakdown of the vote. Labor primary vote in Qld just 27.4%. Fecking around with Adani maybe not the smartest idea.
Mining in Central Queensland has offered thousands of ordinary Queenslanders a quick path to 100% equity in their homes, high quality education for their children, the opportunity to investment themselves into financial independence, job certainty and so on. Much of it came as FIFO employment but some rural centres grew to offer an attractive lifestyle away from the cities.
The Beattie and Bligh governments made a fortune from royalties (most of which they wasted).
The mining communities don't have any time for people from George Street, Brisbane who know what's best for them and they treat Canberra blow ins with utter disdain.
Has been Greens poser Bob Brown took a caravan of unwashed professional protesters up through the Ardani / Carmichael Mine surrounds about three weeks ago, a master stroke for the Coalition.
Local pubs and motels refused to serve them and hundreds of locals turned out to watch them, closely. They want local jobs, not over in WA, and Adani could have been employing thousands already.
They well know that Labor's Mar'n F'rsson, granted in principle approval to Ardani just before he retired six years ago. That has been thwarted by Bono Pocock's li'l kindy friends ever since, because they hate Australia and Australians.
The vote tells the story clearly.
Labor copped a swing against of -3.4% in Queensland and ceded two seats to the Coalition. It already held Maranoa, in the northern coalfields, and it swung a further 6.4% (75% counted), a huge movement.
Ive been looking forward to this post , it didn’t disappoint
-
At least Shorten can comfort himself that he was more likely to become PM than Salim:
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Politics:
So the two front runners for Labor Leader are from the NSW Left. One of them states that Labor didn't have enough time to explain to the electorate how they'd all benefit from Labor's policies.
Talk about doubling down on dumb.
Who dey?
-
I didn't think Labor would get a landslide, but I didn't think they'd lose, either. The polls were too close to be meaningful (and pollsters will be looking for new jobs as people realise these days it just isn't a thing any more). It just felt like the Coalition were getting desperate and the 3-PMS-in-2-terms things puts a target on your back.
BUT you've got to applaud Morrison for basically filing all his Ministers away from the press, and taking everything head-on himself. He made it about him v Shorten, and in the battle of the better (?) man, Morrison rode the preferred PM poll to victory.
Incumbency is also good, when you can frame change as scary so don't risk it.
Also prominent was having a range of policies to attack in simple terms - Franking Credits boiled down to "Retirees Tax" as one example - was good message to keep hammering even though most retirees don't enjoy that level of wealth. Didn't matter. Change is scary. Don't do that.
By running a good scare campaign, and letting Shorten say "wiv" a lot, and also this as a bonus, and you can see why things fell the way they did in QLD:
@Mick-Gold-Coast-QLD said in Aussie Politics:
Has been Greens poser Bob Brown took a caravan of unwashed professional protesters up through the Adani / Carmichael Mine surrounds about three weeks ago, a master stroke for the Coalition.
-
Also let's not forget the 400 pound elephant in the room:
The UAP was a great foil for the Coalition, particularly in QLD, with an ad campaign worth something reportedly above $60M nationally.
It muddied the waters a bit, and despite them getting a bit fat zero, he'll make back that money easily through a friendly government.
-
The election result just got even better,
-
As a household with a high percentile at income, my personal situation will probably not change very much - might even get better on a few tax cuts issues.
Longer term tho, the issues around climate and environment are going to drift under this government. The concern is for the wide brown land itself, but also economically as other nations ramp up their research and development of renewables and other clean technologies.
Another coal fired power station here should have its full costings explained to the taxpayer. At this point, I'd rather go nuke.
Aussie Politics