Elliott Dixon
-
@MN5 said in Elliott Dixon:
Andrew Blowers did all of the wonderful things that Ioane does but Kronfeld and Randell were always in the pecking order above him despite him being the best athlete of them to a casual observer......
Yeah, whole host of guys who were superb atheletes but the ABs went with people with better focus & accuracy long term instead, Blowers, Vito, Lauaki, Cribb, Schueler, Thompson, Tiatia, even Kaino in his early days.
Half of those guys probably lost out (rightly) to Rueben Thorne.
-
I don't think any of the guys mentioned were as talented as Akira, nor as far ahead in development at the same age.
I can sort of see why people mention Lauaki next to Akira, but they're not close to the same player though. Akira has better decision making, workrate, defense, hands/ball security, consistency, and brother.
@broughie said in Elliott Dixon:
@ACT-Crusader Because Akira is a stud and has more potential than Squire, Dixon and Todd. You can't teach the size, speed, skill and mongrel of this guy. If he is not on the EOYT I would be surprised.
I think he can provide whatever Squire provides to the team. He's like a souped up version of Squire actually.
-
@gollum said in Elliott Dixon:
@MN5 said in Elliott Dixon:
Andrew Blowers did all of the wonderful things that Ioane does but Kronfeld and Randell were always in the pecking order above him despite him being the best athlete of them to a casual observer......
Yeah, whole host of guys who were superb atheletes but the ABs went with people with better focus & accuracy long term instead, Blowers, Vito, Lauaki, Cribb, Schueler, Thompson, Tiatia, even Kaino in his early days.
Half of those guys probably lost out (rightly) to Rueben Thorne.
Most of those guys weren't in direct competition with Thorne. The guys who lost out to Thorne were guys like Randell, Flavell, Gibbs etc.
-
-
@Rocky-Rockbottom said in Elliott Dixon:
@Nepia said in Elliott Dixon:
Reading the Wynn Gray article is like talking to the old drunk guy in the pub who just sits down next to you and starts jabbering away.
Goddamn, exactly. The querying title leads you to think some insightful journalism is about to take place, to answer the fucking question posed in the story title, but it immediately just trails off, sorry guys I got nothing, the contrails of a rumination lost to the ether, then the drunken old git just abruptly wanders off.
Exactly my thoughts. Perfect demonstration of how to write "about" something without actually writing about it. Dixon will probably start vs Arg now.