• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Chappell-Hadlee

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
476 Posts 40 Posters 45.9k Views
Chappell-Hadlee
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Bugger - Little Kane goes and it's the end of a very promising partnership.

    87/2 after 14 - going at 6.2

    Time for a few overs of consolidation while Rossco beds himself in (hopefully).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • UncoU Offline
    UncoU Offline
    Unco
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    2x 5 wides already. Awfully generous.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Taylor seems determined to run himself out to Maxwell...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    FFS!!! Fucking stop it!

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #9

    @Donsteppa Jesus wept, Rossco - fucking wake up!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    It will be interesting to see if Finch gives Maxwell a bowl today. Head gets the shot ahead of him again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Taylor was determined to self destruct today.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Well that was inevitable. So much talent, but so fragile.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    pressure piling on Rossco, he'll get himself out shortly with something dumb, it's inevitable

    MOTHERFUCKER!!! As i type, i swear to god Rossco

    And that opens up our extended order of players who average in the 20s. Awesome

    At least their keeper is not up to standard

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Got himself in all sorts there. He's a very nervous starter ol' Roscoe

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Guppy back in the pavilion now. Have to say that was a sweet ball from Stoinis, but bloody arse.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #16

    In hindsight I might have picked de Grandhomme over Ferguson. We might well need the batting depth, and I'm yet to be convinced that Ferguson is anything more than very fast and cannon fodder for decent batsmen*.

    (* Buying some insurance of a reverse jinx early... looks like we may need one later)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Fuck it - and now Guppy goes and our promising start has turned into a fuck up.

    130/4 after 23.4

    Need these guys to bat through to the 40th over.

    Choice of Munro over CdGh currently looking like a good one!

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    aaaaand now we're fucked.

    Proper fucked?

    Yes Tommy, proper fucked

    JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    I would rather have Neesham ahead of Munro. Crucial partnership here. It's a bit frustrating - we seem to get out to the Australian part timers a lot.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #20

    @hydro11 said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    I would rather have Neesham ahead of Munro. Crucial partnership here. It's a bit frustrating - we seem to get out to the Australian part timers a lot.

    Or just bad balls with bad shot selection.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Good thing we picked Munro over de Grandhomme.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #22

    @mariner4life and it just got worse. Munro gone v cheap

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #23

    @Chris-B. said in Chappell-Hadlee:

    Choice of Munro over CdGh currently looking like a good one!

    ...and now it doesn't!

    FFS!!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    because Munro is a bit shit

    And so are we

    fuck

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Chappell-Hadlee
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.