• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Use of the TMO

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
122 Posts 28 Posters 5.0k Views
Use of the TMO
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    I think they should check everything. The problem is the lack of refs to watch every player. They could stop at every tackle or ruck and check for possible infringements. If there aren't any, start again. And add some helmets to reduce head injuries.

    It's bad enough tries aren't being awarded because there's a single frame which suggests someone no longer has an iron grip on the ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    We did this to ourselves. And by us, i mean you, because AB fans don't lose. Endless, and i mean, endless social media; sports forum; phone in; fucking smoke signal whinge fests after every single game looking to absolve everything and everyone for any loss, because the ref fucked us.

    We are not shit at rugby, we were fucked by the ref. How could the ref miss that minuscule knock on that we only found in super-slow-mo? Isn't he professional? It's a fucking conspiracy against my team/in favour of that team.

    Rugby fans are obsessed by referees. Look at any match thread. Who is the ref? Oh shit, really? he hates us. He loves them. He hates breakdowns. He won't let us scrum. He once missed a knock on against my team 8 years ago that i have decided cost us the game. Fuck that guy. He's a cheat. French refs are shit. Aussie refs are shit. Bok refs are shit. English/Irish/Welsh refs are too slow to keep up with the game.

    So world rugby listened, and gave you this clusterfuck. Where we have guys who aren't good enough to be refs watching TV and whispering shit in the refs ear "you missed a very marginal thing back there, we better check it. if we don't we will get accused of cheating" so back we go. And then we better find a penalty, or this will look like a farce.

    Add in endless replays on big screens to get howls of outrage from pissed up idiots in the stands, and it gets infinitely worse.

    We bought this on ourselves. And this toothpaste isn't going back in the tube. The day we got rid of it, someone is going to knock on before scoring against Ireland, no one is going to see it until after it's awarded, and the internet is going to explode. World Rugby will never allow that to happen.

    1 Reply Last reply
    16
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    But yea, i fucking hate it. I hate how it grinds the game to a halt.

    And the game is sloooow. Set piece is just as bad. The little committee meetings before lineout time. Every scrum reset!! Jesus, you get to "crouch" someone isn't 100% happy, so everyone stands up. The props disengage and walk 5m away. And then we start again. Fuck off!!

    The double whammy of all of this is, with all the delays and stoppages, players get so much rest during the game that, combined with 7 subs, the game isn't being opened up by fatigue.

    Fuck knows how you come up with a workable solution to change it though.

    antipodeanA barbarianB 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #7

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    Fuck knows how you come up with a workable solution to change it though.

    Award free kicks for fucking around. Escalate to penalties.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #8

    @antipodean said in Use of the TMO:

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    Fuck knows how you come up with a workable solution to change it though.

    Award free kicks for fucking around. Escalate to penalties.

    you're just trying to get rid of scrummaging!! you just want us to play rugby league!! waaaah!

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #9

    @nepia said in Use of the TMO:

    Do you watch much league? They send 99% of tries to the TMO now even if it's clear to every fool in the ground that it's atry. Although one of your commentors is holding it up as an example to follow because they di it a wee bit quicker.

    They do, but there are two key differences for mine- it's much quicker (often just one replay and then a decision) and the bunker deliberations are piped over the stadium loudspeaker so the crowd know what's happening.

    In rugby, we see replay after replay and if you're at the ground it's complete silence. When a decision is made you have no idea why.

    I'm not against TMO use on tryscoring decisions, though. It's the other stuff I'm annoyed about.

    mariner4lifeM NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #10

    @barbarian they've really sped that bunker stuff up too. And it's only tries, and it's only try scoring movements.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #11

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    @antipodean said in Use of the TMO:

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    Fuck knows how you come up with a workable solution to change it though.

    Award free kicks for fucking around. Escalate to penalties.

    you're just trying to get rid of scrummaging!! you just want us to play rugby league!! waaaah!

    The opposite. If you won't scrummage, you'll lose players to the bin.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #12

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    Fuck knows how you come up with a workable solution to change it though.

    It's the speed that gets me.

    Take the Folau no-try. It took five minutes to resolve. I don't think you'd see nearly as much anger if the TMO looked at it, stopped the game and said 'it's a penalty to Ireland for a tackle without the ball' and that was that.

    Instead, we get the 'hey I THINK I've seen something' and the game grinds to a halt while we call in the touchies, see 15 replays and have a long discussion about what it all means.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #13

    @antipodean said in Use of the TMO:

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    @antipodean said in Use of the TMO:

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    Fuck knows how you come up with a workable solution to change it though.

    Award free kicks for fucking around. Escalate to penalties.

    you're just trying to get rid of scrummaging!! you just want us to play rugby league!! waaaah!

    The opposite. If you won't scrummage, you'll lose players to the bin.

    you think that's how it will be interpreted? Teams with large ass props who want to use their scrum to draw penalties/gain dominance are going to see it as depowering the scrum to make it faster.

    Just to note, in case it's not clear, i absolutely agree with this, and would love to see a shot clock implemented on all set piece. I can already predict the resistance from certain quarters though

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #14

    @barbarian @mariner4life It annoys me more in league because in general they're just straightforward decisions and that's why the Bunker is able to rule on them so quickly. And I always fucking feel like KFC after each decision!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #15

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    you think that's how it will be interpreted? Teams with large ass props who want to use their scrum to draw penalties/gain dominance are going to see it as depowering the scrum to make it faster.

    Then they're looking at it wrongly. If you possess the stronger scrum, you want less wait, so the other team can't recover. The more they tire, the more mistakes, the more scrums you get to have...

    I'd love a 'shot clock implemented on all set piece'.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #16

    @barbarian said in Use of the TMO:

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    Fuck knows how you come up with a workable solution to change it though.

    It's the speed that gets me.

    Take the Folau no-try. It took five minutes to resolve. I don't think you'd see nearly as much anger if the TMO looked at it, stopped the game and said 'it's a penalty to Ireland for a tackle without the ball' and that was that.

    Instead, we get the 'hey I THINK I've seen something' and the game grinds to a halt while we call in the touchies, see 15 replays and have a long discussion about what it all means.

    my problem with that is relevance? How and why was that required? it was a mile before the try, happened in front of the ref, and was waved play on. If by taking out that player, Aus gained the advantage taht resulted in the try, then okay. But we went back so far, for what? a penalty? whoop de ducking doo. Did Coleman shoulder charge him in the had and knock him on? no. so fuck off.

    And getting the on-field ref to be the sole judge by watching the big screen seems absolutely retarded.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #17

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    my problem with that is relevance? How and why was that required?

    And that's the kicker. I understand your arguments above - we are the problem. We are the reason we have this system in the first place.

    But now we're solving things that aren't even problems. If the TMO didn't intervene on that, would there have been outrage? Maybe from the most one-eyed Irish fans, but I don't think the vast majority would bat an eyelid.

    mariner4lifeM RapidoR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    One of the better rugby articles I've read in recent times. Agree with everything you said

    Would love it if stuff or the herald published something like this.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #19

    @barbarian said in Use of the TMO:

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    my problem with that is relevance? How and why was that required?

    And that's the kicker. I understand your arguments above - we are the problem. We are the reason we have this system in the first place.

    But now we're solving things that aren't even problems. If the TMO didn't intervene on that, would there have been outrage? Maybe from the most one-eyed Irish fans, but I don't think the vast majority would bat an eyelid.

    gifs. stills. red circles. red arrows.

    some fuck head in a studio saying "look, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, but i have to say it, Australia were refereed differently today. That's a penalty to Ireland all day, where was the call? It's disgraceful really"

    And the masses will swallow it and attack.

    I would limit it to tries only. And the last phase only. And the TMO makes the decision, while looking at what the ref specifically asks them to. Just adopt the league position.

    Missed "foul play" is for the judiciary

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to SammyC on last edited by
    #20

    @sammyc Thanks!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Oh my favourite subject! The widening of the TMO has failed, for all the reasons above.

    I think the only solution that people will accept is an appeal system. Give each team a fixed number and let them tell the ref what they want checked. TMO agrees and they keep the appeal. TMO disagrees, you lose a sub (no subs left? No appeals).

    The on field ref can refer himself but only for tries and only in the last phase (with the conceding team being given an option to request a specific play checked if they choose to use a review at the same time as the ref refers so they can't watch the replay and request a review).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by antipodean
    #22

    I think we can safely bypass this entire process and have the judicial commissioner and two ex-players on the horn instead.

    Ref: "So after stepping through the process and applicable laws, I'm thinking red card?"
    Judiciary: "Nah mate"
    Ref: "So yellow then?"
    Judiciary: "Probs a penalty against black for falling on his head eh?"

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #23

    @barbarian said in Use of the TMO:

    @mariner4life said in Use of the TMO:

    my problem with that is relevance? How and why was that required?

    And that's the kicker. I understand your arguments above - we are the problem. We are the reason we have this system in the first place.

    But now we're solving things that aren't even problems. If the TMO didn't intervene on that, would there have been outrage? Maybe from the most one-eyed Irish fans, but I don't think the vast majority would bat an eyelid.

    Well, actually, that's a very very large sub-population.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4

Use of the TMO
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.