• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Aussie Pro Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
australia
5.2k Posts 137 Posters 924.2k Views
Aussie Pro Rugby
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Daffy Jaffy on last edited by
    #3858

    @Daffy-Jaffy I can see why judging by that video he's sick of the negative line of questioning. There's ways to interrogate the same issues without being so negative.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #3859

    Yeah they should be totally positive about a 0% win record, singing praises about a record world ranking low. Eddie's Ozzie have tanked, and taking a bunch of babies to RWC is not going to work. If he stopped lying and admitted that they've given up on this year's cup to focus on the lions and 2027, he might get some more positivity.

    At least gatland was honest about that, rather than the bullshit Eddie had been spouting

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #3860

    @Machpants he has repeatedly pointed out they're taking youth with the right attitude. Because otherwise he'd be taking the same failed squad and questions would be asked why. Damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Daffy Jaffy on last edited by Kruse
    #3861

    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Aussie Rugby:

    I've only seen this clearly edited version of events, but....

    • Seemed drunk
    • He'd landed on one message he wanted to portray, and even with a journalist asking the most positive possible question in the world, ended up forgetting/spinning it to that one message
    • Kinda like... a drunk
    • I don't like to brag... but I'm quite qualified to judge on this

    Disclaimer: Can't be arsed watching any full 20-minute version of things to see it all in context.
    That's not the modern way. I have seen an edited twitter-version, and judged on that.

    If I was to guess at the total 20-minute version, there was probably a shit-ton of negative questions beforehand, and he only lost the plot near the end? Even so... some pretty thin skin, or lightweight drinker, to get rattled that badly.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #3862

    @Kruse said in Aussie Rugby:

    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Aussie Rugby:

    I've only seen this clearly edited version of events, but....

    • Seemed drunk
    • He'd landed on one message he wanted to portray, and even with a journalist asking the most positive possible question in the world, ended up forgetting/spinning it to that one message
    • Kinda like... a drunk
    • I don't like to brag... but I'm quite qualified to judge on this

    Disclaimer: Can't be arsed watching any full 20-minute version of things to see it all in context.
    That's not the modern way. I have seen an edited twitter-version, and judged on that.

    If I was to guess at the total 20-minute version, there was probably a shit-ton of negative questions beforehand, and he only lost the plot near the end? Even so... some pretty thin skin, or lightweight drinker, to get rattled that badly.

    Agree, he was halfway to smashing David Boons record before even boarding the plane

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    wrote on last edited by
    #3863

    And he looks fckn ridiculous in an Akubra

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #3864

    @voodoo said in Aussie Rugby:

    @foobaNZ said in Aussie Rugby:

    To be fair I thought some of the follow up questions around Quade were a bit stupid, that seemed to be the tipping point where he started getting annoyed at genuine questions.

    I do think Aussie are going to go well at the WC to be honest. I can see them getting to semis then who knows? One game away from a final.

    Wales, Fiji then Argentina - what a rails run

    No guarantee of beating any of them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by NTA
    #3865

    @mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby:

    pfffft hahaha what the fuck???

    Basically, pick anything related to rugby league and Eddie's all over it.

    And, TBH, why not? Rugby Union in Australia has no fucking idea what it is doing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #3866

    @Nepia said in Aussie Rugby:

    @mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby:

    yes

    turned down the Dragons job, was supposed to be Craig Bellamy's successor.

    Now he's a rugby attack coach apparently.

    I didn't know he was coaching. That AFL dude has carved out a decent rugby coaching career so maybe he'll do ok?

    Mick Byrne? Been doing it for a few decades now though ... learnt his trade.

    Edwards and Farrell doing OK though

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #3867

    Shit getting real in Aussie Women's Rugby today

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #3868

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #3869

    @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

    Shit getting real in Aussie Women's Rugby today

    Can’t argue with any of that

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #3870

    Posted by multiple current and former players.

    Going to be an interesting couple of weeks. Many things going on behind the scenes here which paint a very bad picture of our professional management at both levels

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #3871

    Paid the same? No

    Treated the same? Yes

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #3872

    There's one simple fact, a fucking huge elephant in the room, being ignored here: The ARU has limited funds to subsidize a portion of the game which isn't revenue neutral and given the parlous state of their finances, all endeavours must go to maximising the elements that does bring in the cash in the short term.

    Not that I'm suggesting they're doing a marvellous job of it from my distant vantage point.

    Or the team could go cap in hand to Gina...

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #3873

    I do wonder about the reasoning. I understand the ARU has limited funds, but I firmly believe that without decent investment the women's game will wither and die, and also believe women's rugby is by the best chance of growth in the game. I think the money that legue and AFL isn't a revenue neutral situation, but it sure as shit will be assisting those game to grow. Even myseld a grumpy old bugger who never used to think that women's game was worthwhile can see these things.
    And when I had a business most of the things I paid for (tools, adverts etc) etc I bought cost me a bit of money and I didn't get to see a return until down the track a bit! Players in academies etc generally a on contract without pulling in cash. I think the 2 things here, investment in future, and don't promise things a (ie pro contracts etc) and then not deliver?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #3874

    I don't believe that it will ever be revenue positive. Certainly not if the same standards are applied between the national teams.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #3875

    @antipodean

    Even these guys are on hiatus.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #3876

    @gt12 yeah there's this massive disconnect where we're told that women's sport deserves support, but this comes from people who aren't prepared to do so themselves. Men don't watch because they've already got their sport and women generally don't watch sport. Female AFL, NFL, NRL, soccer, rugby, basketball, etc. I can't see how that can develop sustainably.

    Just look at netball - huge participation, very poor support.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #3877

    @antipodean

    Agreed.

    IMO (and of course this is a generalization), the key difference is that people (men) will demand sport (men’s rugby, men’s footy) as part of the household spend but won’t for the same female sports, and female members won’t demand it.

    Both may support it if it is on, so the FTA route and ad-supported looks the best model to me. Perhaps sky can bundle it up because people will watch it when their more preferred sports are on.

    However, more sport is more sport. I’m not sure that greater penetration with an entertaining but lesser product really works.

    nzzpN NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    0

Aussie Pro Rugby
Sports Talk
australia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.