-
@Wairau said in US Election Thread 2016:
Best erection ever: Weiner Schlongs Clinton ......haha
There are many theories out there on this. Wikilieaks incoming (Assange says his next release will have enough to imprson HRC-just release it, Julian!),
Link to Assange saying/writing this please.
-
is that weird satire?
a thin-skinned bloke who cannot help but hit back when he perceives any sort of slight towards himself - even (as per debates) when it is clearly not in his best interests to do so. tweets in anger at 3am. no semblance of diplomacy in any of his dealings with anyone... he wouldn't start a war, safe as houses. and even if he did, he'd just get the mexicans to pay for it.
-
I am way more concerned about Hilary starting a war than Trump.
She is downright dangerous the way she is so keen to jump when lobbyist say jump. Her policy about a no fly zone over Syria? Would directly lead to conflict with another super power. She is as hawkish as they come.
Who would Trump start a war with? -
@Baron-Silas-Greenback civil war?
-
@taniwharugby said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback civil war?
Deplorables vs Hipsters?
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel comb overs vs toupee's
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback who knows, that's the problem with crazy narcissists: maybe a war on anyone who says anything nasty about donald trump. if trump were president now, would not surprise me in the least if the philippines were in some strife. very easy to see him getting into an escalating war of words with anyone at all isn't it? refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
i'm not making a comment on hillary being better on that front. i just found the graphic re daughters and 'only hillary has the guts to go to war' very strange. still don't really understand it to be honest.
-
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
Or having those troops under him feel its their right to throw a punch first.
-
She allows 3 questions from 1:16. (she is trying to play the I am the victim of a partisan FBI card, but I am not sure their protocol allows for immediate release of all their findings)
More importantly.....
Her body language and word choice suggest to me she is not being truthful. (but that could be my own confirmation bias)
-
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback who knows, that's the problem with crazy narcissists: maybe a war on anyone who says anything nasty about donald trump. if trump were president now, would not surprise me in the least if the philippines were in some strife. very easy to see him getting into an escalating war of words with anyone at all isn't it? refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
i'm not making a comment on hillary being better on that front. i just found the graphic re daughters and 'only hillary has the guts to go to war' very strange. still don't really understand it to be honest.
1/ Hilary is also a crazy narcissist.
2/ All I hear is narrative about Trump and war, I asked for specific real threats caused by policy declarations. Clintons stated and recorded policy Syria would cause conflict with Russia. -
@Frank said in US Election Thread 2016:
She allows 3 questions from 1:16. (she is trying to play the I am the victim of a partisan FBI card, but I am not sure their protocol allows for immediate release of all their findings)
More importantly.....
Her body language and word choice suggest to me she is not being truthful. (but that could be my own confirmation bias)
She is so incredibly disingenuous, she knows damn well the FBI cannot release everything, it is part of an active case.
-
@NTA said in US Election Thread 2016:
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
Or having those troops under him feel its their right to throw a punch first.
So you are saying that the US army would start a war because Trump tweets angry shit at 3am?
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
@NTA said in US Election Thread 2016:
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
Or having those troops under him feel its their right to throw a punch first.
So you are saying that the US army would start a war because Trump tweets angry shit at 3am?
No. I believe YOU just said that.
To take a leaf out of your book: stop making shit up.
-
@NTA said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
@NTA said in US Election Thread 2016:
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
Or having those troops under him feel its their right to throw a punch first.
So you are saying that the US army would start a war because Trump tweets angry shit at 3am?
No. I believe YOU just said that.
To take a leaf out of your book: stop making shit up.
No I asked if that was what you are saying as that is it what it appeared to me. I am not sure on what basis you seem to think that it is likely that any US army would throw the first punch because of Trump as president. You are the one feeding that story.
So why exactly would the US armed forces throw the first punch under Trump but not HIlary?The Trump scare tactics are getting more ludicrous by the day.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
So why exactly would the US armed forces throw the first punch under Trump but not HIlary?
I didn't say that, either.
US Politics