-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback who knows, that's the problem with crazy narcissists: maybe a war on anyone who says anything nasty about donald trump. if trump were president now, would not surprise me in the least if the philippines were in some strife. very easy to see him getting into an escalating war of words with anyone at all isn't it? refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
i'm not making a comment on hillary being better on that front. i just found the graphic re daughters and 'only hillary has the guts to go to war' very strange. still don't really understand it to be honest.
-
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
Or having those troops under him feel its their right to throw a punch first.
-
She allows 3 questions from 1:16. (she is trying to play the I am the victim of a partisan FBI card, but I am not sure their protocol allows for immediate release of all their findings)
More importantly.....
Her body language and word choice suggest to me she is not being truthful. (but that could be my own confirmation bias)
-
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback who knows, that's the problem with crazy narcissists: maybe a war on anyone who says anything nasty about donald trump. if trump were president now, would not surprise me in the least if the philippines were in some strife. very easy to see him getting into an escalating war of words with anyone at all isn't it? refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
i'm not making a comment on hillary being better on that front. i just found the graphic re daughters and 'only hillary has the guts to go to war' very strange. still don't really understand it to be honest.
1/ Hilary is also a crazy narcissist.
2/ All I hear is narrative about Trump and war, I asked for specific real threats caused by policy declarations. Clintons stated and recorded policy Syria would cause conflict with Russia. -
@Frank said in US Election Thread 2016:
She allows 3 questions from 1:16. (she is trying to play the I am the victim of a partisan FBI card, but I am not sure their protocol allows for immediate release of all their findings)
More importantly.....
Her body language and word choice suggest to me she is not being truthful. (but that could be my own confirmation bias)
She is so incredibly disingenuous, she knows damn well the FBI cannot release everything, it is part of an active case.
-
@NTA said in US Election Thread 2016:
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
Or having those troops under him feel its their right to throw a punch first.
So you are saying that the US army would start a war because Trump tweets angry shit at 3am?
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
@NTA said in US Election Thread 2016:
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
Or having those troops under him feel its their right to throw a punch first.
So you are saying that the US army would start a war because Trump tweets angry shit at 3am?
No. I believe YOU just said that.
To take a leaf out of your book: stop making shit up.
-
@NTA said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
@NTA said in US Election Thread 2016:
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
Or having those troops under him feel its their right to throw a punch first.
So you are saying that the US army would start a war because Trump tweets angry shit at 3am?
No. I believe YOU just said that.
To take a leaf out of your book: stop making shit up.
No I asked if that was what you are saying as that is it what it appeared to me. I am not sure on what basis you seem to think that it is likely that any US army would throw the first punch because of Trump as president. You are the one feeding that story.
So why exactly would the US armed forces throw the first punch under Trump but not HIlary?The Trump scare tactics are getting more ludicrous by the day.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
So why exactly would the US armed forces throw the first punch under Trump but not HIlary?
I didn't say that, either.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback who knows, that's the problem with crazy narcissists: maybe a war on anyone who says anything nasty about donald trump. if trump were president now, would not surprise me in the least if the philippines were in some strife. very easy to see him getting into an escalating war of words with anyone at all isn't it? refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
i'm not making a comment on hillary being better on that front. i just found the graphic re daughters and 'only hillary has the guts to go to war' very strange. still don't really understand it to be honest.
1/ Hilary is also a crazy narcissist.
2/ All I hear is narrative about Trump and war, I asked for specific real threats caused by policy declarations. Clintons stated and recorded policy Syria would cause conflict with Russia.- maybe, but i wasn't talking about her. nor did i make any comparative statement at all - in fact i put a disclaimer to that effect in the post, which you ignored.
- that might be all you hear, but that doesn't mean it's all people are saying. it seems like you don't even know what you're saying anymore - you didn't ask for 'specific threats caused by policy declarations' at all, you said "Who would Trump start a war with?". that's a direct quote, and it's what i responded to.
-
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
@reprobate said in US Election Thread 2016:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback who knows, that's the problem with crazy narcissists: maybe a war on anyone who says anything nasty about donald trump. if trump were president now, would not surprise me in the least if the philippines were in some strife. very easy to see him getting into an escalating war of words with anyone at all isn't it? refusing to back down, and making shows of military might - brinksmanship which can easily lead to disaster.
i'm not making a comment on hillary being better on that front. i just found the graphic re daughters and 'only hillary has the guts to go to war' very strange. still don't really understand it to be honest.
1/ Hilary is also a crazy narcissist.
2/ All I hear is narrative about Trump and war, I asked for specific real threats caused by policy declarations. Clintons stated and recorded policy Syria would cause conflict with Russia.- maybe, but i wasn't talking about her. nor did i make any comparative statement at all - in fact i put a disclaimer to that effect in the post, which you ignored.
- that might be all you hear, but that doesn't mean it's all people are saying. it seems like you don't even know what you're saying anymore - you didn't ask for 'specific threats caused by policy declarations' at all, you said "Who would Trump start a war with?". that's a direct quote, and it's what i responded to.
Cool... so all you have is ... basically nothing? I have actually given an example of Clintons policy leading to a war with a super power.
Trump would lead to war because....? Regressives hate him? He has orange skin? Wants to build a wall? Makes sexually inappropriate comments about women? Is not a women? Is not Clinton? -
@Baron-Silas-Greenback why do you think i want to compare the candidates or have an argument you strange man. i simply answered your question - the one you asked that is, not the one you made up afterwards.
why do you feel the need to defend trump? -
Yes.. why on earth would you compare candidates in a 2 horse race for President of the most powerful country in the world.. in relation to starting wars? Especially in a thread about the election... when were discussing a potential president starting wars...
Carry on with mindless attacking of Trump because the media and celebrities tell you to.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
Yes.. why on earth would you compare candidates in a 2 horse race for President of the most powerful country in the world.. in relation to starting wars? Especially in a thread about the election... when were discussing a potential president starting wars...
Carry on with mindless attacking of Trump because the media and celebrities tell you to.
back to your old tricks eh? ask a question, get an answer, state that you asked a different question, throw your toys because the question you never asked wasn't answered to your satisfaction, then go the personal attack and imply somebody else is stupid - both for not answering the question you never asked, and in general. it's pretty good really, if a little predictable.
you're so determined to pursue your pet topics, and so confident that it is other people who are blinded by 'the media' - all the while copying the jargon your media feeds you - it's getting ridiculous. now i'm saying things because celebrities tell me to? might i ask which celebrities? if you're going to make shit up (TM), you might as well be thorough. -
@reprobate
I have to assume that you are just parroting... because you refused to actually come with anything substantial about how Trump would start a war. When when I ask you for specific examples like I provided with Clinton.. you just start blathering on about what you didn't say.
I am trying to compare actual stated policies and how they might realistically start a war.You... actually I have no idea what you are trying to say beyond ranting that you are saying nothing.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
@reprobate
I have to assume that you are just parroting... because you refused to actually come with anything substantial about how Trump would start a war. When when I ask you for specific examples like I provided with Clinton.. you just start blathering on about what you didn't say.
I am trying to compare actual stated policies and how they might realistically start a war.You... actually I have no idea what you are trying to say beyond ranting that you are saying nothing.
i know you can't be bothered with reading, but why don't you go back and read the question you asked me, and read the reply i gave, and then reply to that - that being when i said something - you obviously missed it in your race to go off on your pet topic and start making stuff up.
you still actually haven't asked me for specific examples at all - you've just stated incorrectly multiple times that you have asked for this, but repetition doesn't make something true. more importantly you've changed the topic, you're trying to re-frame what was being discussed, and i'm not interested. i answered a question specific to trump, specifically said i wasn't saying anything about hillary being better, but you just ignore everything and rant away about whatever you want to anyway, so it's all kinda pointless.as for blathering on about what i didn't say - that seems to become mighty important to you when the shoe is on the other foot - a touch hypocritical no?
US Politics