Woo
-
Finally some of the kids are using the internet for good
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=12202734
-
-
@taniwharugby said in Woo:
@jegga my 10 yr old asked me why she can't get Vaccinated for that...I told her Jacinda said she didnt need to.
As to that kid that got himself vaccinated.. saw these comments online...
Classic
-
So youtube demonetising videos is okay as long as we agree with the message?
-
@mariner4life said in Woo:
So youtube demonetising videos is okay as long as we agree with the message?
I disagree with the message and it’s also very dangerous so yeah fuck anti vaxxers.
I think they should be given the same treatment as the pro Ana movement, YouTube removes pro anorexia videos , they even get a chance to make money out of them .
-
@mariner4life said in Woo:
So youtube demonetising videos is okay as long as we agree with the message?
It's better than de-platforming them, and when actual harm can be demonstrated (you know, dead kids) this seems an appropriate response.
-
@taniwharugby said in Woo:
@booboo were you not immunised?
Repeatedly dosing myself is part of my immunisation process ...
-
@mariner4life said in Woo:
So youtube demonetising videos is okay as long as we agree with the message?
It's better than de-platforming them, and when actual harm can be demonstrated (you know, dead kids) this seems an appropriate response.
I'm against this. I'm no fan of anti-vax but this just paves the way (well it's mostly paved already) for removing all monetisation of anything that goes against a multinational corporations view of the world even if the views are 100% backed up with evidence.
For example on facebook you can be banned for saying 'Females don't have a penis'. How long before youtube demonetises and finally shuts down human biology channels for their blatant 'hate facts'.
...anyway it all should accelerate Youtube's demise
-
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@mariner4life said in Woo:
So youtube demonetising videos is okay as long as we agree with the message?
It's better than de-platforming them, and when actual harm can be demonstrated (you know, dead kids) this seems an appropriate response.
I'm against this. I'm no fan of anti-vax but this just paves the way (well it's mostly paved already) for removing all monetisation of anything that goes against a multinational corporations view of the world even if the views are 100% backed up with evidence.
For example on facebook you can be banned for saying 'Females don't have a penis'. How long before youtube demonetises and finally shuts down human biology channels for their blatant 'hate facts'.
...anyway it all should accelerate Youtube's demise
I would agree with you about the culture war idiocy but this isn’t done at the behest of multinationals it’s done because spreading the idea that vaccines are harmful is incredibly dangerous. Some diseases are starting to make a comeback as is measles because of these people.
They are still free to rant on YouTube , I don’t see why they should be able to make money out of spreading dangerous lies. -
@Rembrandt said in Woo:
@mariner4life said in Woo:
So youtube demonetising videos is okay as long as we agree with the message?
It's better than de-platforming them, and when actual harm can be demonstrated (you know, dead kids) this seems an appropriate response.
I'm against this. I'm no fan of anti-vax but this just paves the way (well it's mostly paved already) for removing all monetisation of anything that goes against a multinational corporations view of the world even if the views are 100% backed up with evidence.
For example on facebook you can be banned for saying 'Females don't have a penis'. How long before youtube demonetises and finally shuts down human biology channels for their blatant 'hate facts'.
...anyway it all should accelerate Youtube's demise
I clearly made the distinction for showing real harm. Same standard for free speech where you can't falsely shout fire in a crowded theatre.