Royal drama
-
@mokey said in Royal drama:
particularly pathetic against pedo prince we are pretending we don't know about.
Nice alliteration there, you should write books. Actually a pedo prince could be quite a good villain in an historical novel, but yes I agree. Quibbling over who was discussing "shades of grey" - beige, in this case - or bullying for that matter, is the thinnest of thinly veiled distractions from the elephant in the phone box that a pedo prince is.
-
@snowy said in Royal drama:
@mokey said in Royal drama:
Oprah has returned to 'clarify' that the skin tone comments weren't the Queen (not surprised) or Phillip (surprised) but still a lot of potentially innocent family members slandered by lack of specifics.
Andrew would be a good choice.
I don’t think that they alluded that it was a family member that made the comment.
My guess is one of the “management “. They are the real out of touch old farts terrified of negativity or being different.
I have had interactions with a number of them and they are way more pompous than the royals they work for. -
-
@crucial we watched a bit of it, i have to say thats where i think Oprah did a bad job, too many terms like the "establishment" or the "firm" etc...didn;t draw any lines between the family and the "management"...it was all a bit vague. If people are acting unacceptable...why protect them with vagueness, which really just makes everyone a suspect
-
i was also surprised how many of Megans revelations were second hand, she'd make a comment, oprah would say something like "they actually said that to you" and she would say "they said it to harry"...then why isn;t he the one saying it?
-
@sparky said in Royal drama:
The bits with the chickens were very weird.
I'm going to have ask...
Meghan related anecdotes about royals bullying chickens?
Harry has shagged a chicken?
Oprah had KFC delivered (or put under Meghan's chair)? Which really would be weird.I might actually have to watch it just to get the chicken reference.
-
@kiwiwomble said in Royal drama:
i was also surprised how many of Megans revelations were second hand, she'd make a comment, oprah would say something like "they actually said that to you" and she would say "they said it to harry"...then why isn;t he the one saying it?
This explains it
-
As seen at: https://www.facebook.com/SteveTheMaoriDaniel
-
@crucial oh yes I think they clearly meant family suggested the darkie comment.
Because Oprah later said Harry did NOT mean his grandparents.
Methinks it is an open threat to William or Charles. Probably Charles.
You wanna be the people's king? Who you calling golliwog, pops?
If this is a threat, high stakes indeed.
Then again, everytime I want to mend family squabbles away from the media's prying eye, I too find it best to tell all to Oprah on national/international? Tv.
And Harry says he wants to mend fences with his dad and bro. Yup, vague accusations of racism really brings the rellies together especially the generation with ties to Nazi germany. Top call there, Raggapunzel (and you wouldn't be seen dead in a Gestapo uniform yourself, no doubt).And no, I am not being racist, some of my fave farm animals are ginger.
-
PS I am absolutely shocked anyone could insinuate there is underlying racism in the Royal Family. Nobody could see it coming.