• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Chiefs v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
385 Posts 41 Posters 19.2k Views
Chiefs v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #48

    @antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    At least Poihipi can walk off the field, so not too bad.

    Hope for the best but that doesn't always mean damage has been avoided

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #49

    @antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    At least Poihipi can walk off the field, so not too bad.

    Hope itโ€™s not too bad. But players have walked off the field of play and still done their ACL

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #50

    Who was that pair that drove SB back

    BonesB M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    Saders getting physically dominated

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Reece on the ground and part of the ruck, gets up in the middle of it and picks up the ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #53

    @taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Who was that pair that drove SB back

    Props,?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #54

    @taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Who was that pair that drove SB back

    Shalfoon, wasn't it?

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #55

    @Machpants said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Who was that pair that drove SB back

    Shalfoon, wasn't it?

    Yeah it was number 5

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    Chiefs tackling noticeably lower in target height

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    I see we're ignoring crusaders obstruction on kicks, has that been dropped already?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    Havili is so dumb, so often

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #59

    @Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    I see we're ignoring crusaders obstruction on kicks, has that been dropped already?

    take the eye patch off....

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    Our 9 and 10 struggling to direct the attack.

    taniwharugbyT mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #61

    @ACT-Crusader back to earth after plaudits lastbweek

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #62

    @ACT-Crusader said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Our 9 and 10 struggling to direct the attack.

    Chiefs tackling accurate and not allowing post contact metres

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #63

    @taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader back to earth after plaudits lastbweek

    But that was only the Canes. This is the real stuff against the Thiefโ€™s.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    How many penalties ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Mattasaurus on last edited by
    #65

    @Mattasaurus said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    I see we're ignoring crusaders obstruction on kicks, has that been dropped already?

    take the eye patch off....

    Yeah that's me, chiefs massive. If Carter is jumping into two crusaders forwards and can't reach the ball, with Jordan behind them, tell me how that's not obstruction?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #66

    @Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @Mattasaurus said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:

    I see we're ignoring crusaders obstruction on kicks, has that been dropped already?

    take the eye patch off....

    Yeah that's me, chiefs massive. If Carter is jumping into two crusaders forwards and can't reach the ball, with Jordan behind them, tell me how that's not obstruction?

    I know you're Chiefs massive mate i should have added the ๐Ÿ˜‰

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #67

    Aye? Take the 3 you eggs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Chiefs v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.