• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

MOTM v Wales

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved MOTM Polls
allblacks
37 Posts 26 Posters 2.7k Views
MOTM v Wales
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Salacious CrumbS Offline
    Salacious CrumbS Offline
    Salacious Crumb
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #5

    @tim

    Same.

    MilkM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    Cane, Ioane, SBW. SBW over ALB because he played the whole game well, whereas ALB was only on 2nd half. Naholo just missing out for taking two tries really really well. It's a pity, Reiko and Waisake can't share a vote.

    S Whitelock would have been up there if not for his yellow (got to be consistent).

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Salacious CrumbS Offline
    Salacious CrumbS Offline
    Salacious Crumb
    wrote on last edited by Salacious Crumb
    #7

    Cane and Reiko pick themselves, there could have been a few for my third but I'll select SBW for the third pick, as much for the stick he's copped this year, he played a strong game and will have likely shut up a lot of his detractors in the off-season. His defence was huge today, and his grubber was another beautie that almost led to a try, it's become a serious weapon in his arsenal.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    I'm disappointed, someone didn't vote for Ioane? Ioane is my MOTM for the sheer brilliance on attack, he created 4 tries and scored 2, without him it could have been a different scoreline. Cane was immense with his 25 tackles and impressive as always. Really thinking we should play a Todd/Cane combo with Todd focusing on turnovers with Cane just dominating the tackle area. I still gave Whitelock a vote just for his workload.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #9

    @chimoaus said in MOTM v Wales:

    Really thinking we should play a Todd/Cane combo with Todd focusing on turnovers with Cane just dominating the tackle area.

    If the selectors don't want Jerome anymore it is a viable option. Cane actually operates like a 6 to me and Todd is pretty good over the ball. It would be an experiment but might be worth a try.

    gt12G kiwiinmelbK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #10

    @snowy
    If we are getting the tight work done from 1-5 (perhaps excepting 2) then I think that's a nice idea - if Read can revert to the the wide ball runner, while Cane and Todd clean up around the rucks. Personally though, I like the idea of having one more (effective!) big body there early and finishing with Todd, who has easily overtaken Savea as the bench option right now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Sam C, Sam W and Reiko

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    the Sams and SBW

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #13

    @taniwharugby said in MOTM v Wales:

    the Sams and SBW

    Prize for getting it right goes to TR!

    Special mention for the wingers. But the Sams for their massive workload and Dubs was awesome in midfield. As busy as I've seen him. Organising, hitting up, tackling, drawing defenders.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MilkM Offline
    MilkM Offline
    Milk
    replied to Salacious Crumb on last edited by
    #14

    @salacious-crumb said in MOTM v Wales:

    @tim

    Same.

    Same

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    SBW was good but the wingers were exceptional.
    Todd in top 5 methinks. Sam W showed his class at key moments and was a great workhorse as he always is. Underrated AB.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #16

    @snowy said in MOTM v Wales:

    @chimoaus said in MOTM v Wales:

    Really thinking we should play a Todd/Cane combo with Todd focusing on turnovers with Cane just dominating the tackle area.

    If the selectors don't want Jerome anymore it is a viable option. Cane actually operates like a 6 to me and Todd is pretty good over the ball. It would be an experiment but might be worth a try.

    Focusing on turnovers from one player doesnt seem to be one of their priorities ... well it hasnt since Richie was that guy in his early years ,

    They seem to prefer 3 guys that win the contact area , and winning turnovers to be a collective thing ,

    But they might have a rethink with what is available

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    One issue about going for turnovers is that it usually comes at a cost in penalties when you get it wrong. We were vulnerable to teams playing negatively, but kicking those penalties.

    Now the strategy is to make teams attack us if they want to win. We then have a game of movement, which we prefer.

    Wales attacked for long periods on the weekend and we didn't give them soft three pointers -- they had to earn any penalties. It's been years, since anyone strangled us the way France did in the missing RWC.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    Wait, SBW had a good game? Seriously?

    I thought it was his worst of the year. All he did in the first half was drop the ball, throw shit passes, and make a bad rwad for their first try. Oh snd gave away the penalty for their first 3 pointer. I'm astounded.

    antipodeanA Salacious CrumbS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by No Quarter
    #19

    The level Cane is playing at is seriously not far below McCaw at the moment. He has been massively influential in every test this year. Dominant tackle after dominant tackle, he's an absolute fucking warrior.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Also, Naholo gets some flak on here but he is an absolute class finisher. That's the sort of finishing that has set us apart from NH teams this year, and his two tries were both not easy and bloody critical.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #21

    @mariner4life said in MOTM v Wales:

    Oh snd gave away the penalty for their first 3 pointer. I'm astounded.

    You'll find that was a prop.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to antipodean on last edited by Stargazer
    #22

    @antipodean Nope, that was definitely SBW. The Welsh guy did everything - including slapping his lower back/butt - to attract the ref's attention to him entering the ruck from the side.

    Edited: Still think it was really marginal. The Welsh player basically moved SBW more to side and then starting milking the penalty.

    Hames gave away the second penalty though.

    JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Whitelock, Taylor, Crotty

    Cane and Ioane were okay.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Cane, ALB & Ioane

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

MOTM v Wales
MOTM Polls
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.