• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Build A Waterfront Stadium

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
72 Posts 20 Posters 4.0k Views
Build A Waterfront Stadium
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to nzzp on last edited by jegga
    #18

    @Chris-B hookers and coke don’t pay for themselves you know.

    @nzzp said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @jegga said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    $932000 for a report . A quick question for you Jafas , does your rates bill come with a tube of lube?

    Fun facts about paying rates in Auckland

    1. No lube
    2. Not even a reach around
    3. Our mayor has more than 6 spin doctors (well, the last one did)
    4. Revenue is $4.5B. It feels like most of this comes from my house 😛

    despite all of this, I suspect we still have lower rates than Kaipara and Mangawhai. They really managed to stuff up their sewerage system in a big way.

    You must be oh so stoked about this then , if this pile of shit can double in price I’d imagine every dodgy contractor in NZ draws wood at the thought of Auckland ratepayers paying for a stadium.

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11790137

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #19

    @jegga said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @Chris-B hookers and coke don’t pay for themselves you know.

    @nzzp said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    The margins on development are tiny. I know some developers with money, who can't make projects stack up. Land cost, + council cost +build cost escalation just leaves nothign in it for them. And these guys know what they are doing. It's pretty farking scary when you consider how many houses we need in auckland for the 70,000 new people each year.

    Still, easier to talk about a waterfront stadium eh

    jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Building a port in the firth of Thames would be insane.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #21

    @nzzp said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @jegga said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @Chris-B hookers and coke don’t pay for themselves you know.

    @nzzp said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    The margins on development are tiny. I know some developers with money, who can't make projects stack up. Land cost, + council cost +build cost escalation just leaves nothign in it for them. And these guys know what they are doing. It's pretty farking scary when you consider how many houses we need in auckland for the 70,000 new people each year.

    Still, easier to talk about a waterfront stadium eh

    The margins are only tight if you play by the rules , draw out as much coin as you can until you have to declare bankruptcy , leave the subbies carrying the rest of the debt and start up under a new name and you’re sorted .
    If a report can cost almost $1000000 a stadium is going to make Auckland ratepayers feel like Annabelle Chong.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #22

    @taniwharugby said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @nzzp you forgot to tag @Snowy

    Don't fucking start me!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #23

    @jegga said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @nzzp said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @jegga said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @Chris-B hookers and coke don’t pay for themselves you know.

    @nzzp said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    The margins on development are tiny. I know some developers with money, who can't make projects stack up. Land cost, + council cost +build cost escalation just leaves nothign in it for them. And these guys know what they are doing. It's pretty farking scary when you consider how many houses we need in auckland for the 70,000 new people each year.

    Still, easier to talk about a waterfront stadium eh

    If a report can cost almost $1000000 a stadium is going to make Auckland ratepayers feel like Annabelle Chong.

    Or Bevan Chuang even! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #24

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    Building a port in the firth of Thames would be insane.

    Mt Maunganui?

    Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #25

    @booboo said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    Building a port in the firth of Thames would be insane.

    Mt Maunganui?

    You would basically have the 2 biggest ports in the country right beside each other. Who exactly would pay for the HUGE cost of building a port out of basically nothing. Because the Port of Tauranga would slaughter them and make it a terrible investment.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Personally I have no issues with a working port in the CBD, but I know many do.

    Of the many sites that have been examined the Firth of Thames actually makes the most sense.

    Caveat the other contenders were the Manukau, Kaipara, Marsden Point and Mahurangi.

    Shipping Lines like it because it is actually easier access for them and much easier than crossing a west coast bar.

    The idea is to have a rail link to the existing Wiri container terminal (about 25kms from memory). It is a deeper access than all the other options (including current) except Marsden Point which is one environmental point in its favour but any development will run up against green and iwi concerns I'm sure.

    The cost will be many billions but there is the current port land as an off-set.

    In any scenario Akl retains its cruise ship terminals

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #27

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @booboo said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    Building a port in the firth of Thames would be insane.

    Mt Maunganui?

    You would basically have the 2 biggest ports in the country right beside each other. Who exactly would pay for the HUGE cost of building a port out of basically nothing. Because the Port of Tauranga would slaughter them and make it a terrible investment.

    I meant expand Tauranga and redirect shipping to there, not build a competitor.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #28

    @booboo That ignores the fact that the Ports of Akl and Tga are competitors. Why would Akl gift their business to Tga?

    boobooB Baron Silas GreenbackB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #29

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @booboo That ignores the fact that the Ports of Akl and Tga are competitors. Why would Akl gift their business to Tga?

    Wasn't aware of that. Just a thought bubble that I think I may have heard elsewhere.

    Who owns said ports?

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by taniwharugby
    #30

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    The idea is to have a rail link to the existing Wiri container terminal (about 25kms from memory). It is a deeper access than all the other options (including current) except Marsden Point which is one environmental point in its favour but any development will run up against green and iwi concerns I'm sure.

    It has/does/will

    Any expansion to MP is almost certainly linked to a rail line to service it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #31

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @booboo That ignores the fact that the Ports of Akl and Tga are competitors. Why would Akl gift their business to Tga?

    They will be gifting it anyway if they try and build a port in Thames....

    Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #32

    @baron-silas-greenback said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @booboo That ignores the fact that the Ports of Akl and Tga are competitors. Why would Akl gift their business to Tga?

    They will be gifting it anyway if they try and build a port in Thames....

    MP is the obvious location. Thames is an idea for the retarded.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #33

    @baron-silas-greenback Issues with MP is getting the freight south.

    The Northern Line would need squillions spent on it to bring it up to a state where it could handle the freight. There has been a lack of investment over the years plus the infrastructure can't handle the size of carriage needed to move it. So you are talking widening tunnels building new viaducts etc.

    Effectively you would be building a new 130km line as opposed to a 25 km one.

    Then you have the problem of moving all that freight through the Akl isthmus which will put it in conflict with Akl Transports requirements for commuter rail. Of course you could alternatively put hundreds more artics a day onto SH1 but that creates a whole lot of different issues.

    MP sounds great in that there is already a deep sea port there. But its tiny and its remote. I think the analysis shows the Firth option working out cheaper.

    taniwharugbyT Baron Silas GreenbackB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #34

    @dogmeat but Winston said he'd do it!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #35

    @booboo POA is council owned Tga is publically listed

    Baron Silas GreenbackB boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #36
    This post is deleted!
    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by Baron Silas Greenback
    #37

    @dogmeat said in Build A Waterfront Stadium:

    @booboo POA is council owned Tga is publically listed

    True, but not the whole story, a lot of the shares in POT are owned by the regional council via Quayside holdings

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Build A Waterfront Stadium
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.