Highlanders v Crusaders
-
-
Geez we almost fluffed that badly.
-
-
@ACT-Crusader was thinking they made bloody hard work of what appeared to be a try all day
-
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
I just don’t get why penalties are given when one scrum just demolished another, that just penalising someone for not being strong enough, that can’t change that
Out of interest, what do you want them to rule when the scrum gets messy because one scrum is inferior ,
I don’t think they have an option
-
@taniwharugby said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@ACT-Crusader was thinking they made bloody hard work of what appeared to be a try all day
A lack of communication between Havili and Goodhue.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@Bones said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
Fainganuku gets up and goes again without releasing after being brought down in a tackle. Guess we're just going back to how it was then eh.
He wasn't tackled
Oh he fell over. Under the force of someone else, from the opposition. Went to ground in a non tackle. Ok then...
-
@kiwiinmelb said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@Kiwiwomble said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
I just don’t get why penalties are given when one scrum just demolished another, that just penalising someone for not being strong enough, that can’t change that
Out of interest, what do you want them to rule when the scrum gets messy because one scrum is inferior ,
I don’t think they have an option
Free kick, team that won the ball gets the ball
-
@gt12 said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
Great.
Another lock injured.
Holding the middle of his calf, broken?
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@kiwiinmelb said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@Kiwiwomble said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
I just don’t get why penalties are given when one scrum just demolished another, that just penalising someone for not being strong enough, that can’t change that
Out of interest, what do you want them to rule when the scrum gets messy because one scrum is inferior ,
I don’t think they have an option
Free kick, team that won the ball gets the ball
Ok fair enough
-
@Bones said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@KiwiMurph said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@Bones said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
Fainganuku gets up and goes again without releasing after being brought down in a tackle. Guess we're just going back to how it was then eh.
He wasn't tackled
Oh he fell over. Under the force of someone else, from the opposition. Went to ground in a non tackle. Ok then...
He wasn't near being held. He doesn't have to release.
-
@Bones doesnt he have to be held as well when he goes to ground, not just bought down by the opposition?
-
@taniwharugby said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@Bones doesnt he have to be held as well when he goes to ground, not just bought down by the opposition?
That would be a penalty for not releasing the tackled player...
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
I just don’t get why penalties are given when one scrum just demolished another, that just penalising someone for not being strong enough, they can’t change that
Problem there is that the Landers prop lost their bind because of the pressure. That should be (and is) penalty.
-
Frizell again with good low body position and leg drive.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@Bones said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@KiwiMurph said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
@Bones said in Highlanders v Crusaders:
Fainganuku gets up and goes again without releasing after being brought down in a tackle. Guess we're just going back to how it was then eh.
He wasn't tackled
Oh he fell over. Under the force of someone else, from the opposition. Went to ground in a non tackle. Ok then...
He wasn't near being held. He doesn't have to release.
Ok interested to see how that stacks up against the laws and current focus...
