New Zealand v West Indies
-
-
@Donsteppa said in New Zealand v West Indies:
Siefert’s keeping has been tidy against the short ball.
But eventually gets bounced completely
-
-
@Donsteppa said in New Zealand v West Indies:
World XI at one end and the Ilford 2nds at the other springs to mind
Yeah this game maybe but he ain’t Hadlee yet.
-
@MN5 said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@Donsteppa said in New Zealand v West Indies:
World XI at one end and the Ilford 2nds at the other springs to mind
Yeah this game maybe but he ain’t Hadlee yet.
I thought “this game” went without clarifying, given his zero test wickets
-
-
-
I’m late to the party, (been watching the rugby final) but holy shit what a first 6 overs.
Jamieson & Bennett have their arses absolutely given to them on a plate, they’re 55/0 after 3.
The next 3 overs from Ferg & Timmy produce 5/5!!!
Get the fuck outa town... what’s going to happen next???
-
@MN5 said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@Bovidae said in New Zealand v West Indies:
How the hell does Bennett keep getting selected?
Holy shit, his figures are Neesh like.
Both playing for Wellington too, like those Canes players in the ABs.
-
@Bovidae said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@MN5 said in New Zealand v West Indies:
@Bovidae said in New Zealand v West Indies:
How the hell does Bennett keep getting selected?
Holy shit, his figures are Neesh like.
Both playing for Wellington too, like those Canes players in the ABs.
I come to threads like this to forget the ABs. Please respect my wishes.
-
NZ's target is less than WI scored.
I am afraid that makes no sense to me.
If WI knew they were only batting for 16 overs they would have gone harder earlier - not that this necessarily implies more runs. . I would have thought no change would have been about right.
