• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
575 Posts 61 Posters 33.8k Views
SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #159

    @act-crusader said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @gt12 said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Imagine what this Chief’s team might be like if it had a functioning line out?

    More opportunities to throw intercepts?

    If take that rather than giving it to you at the line out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #160

    @Yeetyaah

    Follow the line to yellow, then mitigated it one step, penalty

    Excellent call, not ' ludacris' lol

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #161

    That’s only a knock on because the player was holding on ref.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    wrote on last edited by
    #162

    Penalty try surely for that head contact, right?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    wrote on last edited by
    #163

    Why wasn’t the scrum a penalty?

    ToddyT gt12G ACT CrusaderA 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #164

    @kev random right. The Chiefs disintegrated.

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    wrote on last edited by Mattasaurus
    #165

    Bloody entertaining game so far.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #166

    @kev said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Why wasn’t the scrum a penalty?

    Terrible refereeing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #167

    @kev said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Why wasn’t the scrum a penalty?

    Chiefs front row all up and Saders scrum going forward.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #168

    @anonymous said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Penalty try surely for that head contact, right?

    I don't know how they can justify it not being. That's a bit weird. It is the crusaders I guess...

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #169

    If that is a penalty how is it not a penalty try?

    Take the offending player out of the play and it’s a try all day.

    Controversial!

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #170

    Havili read that brilliantly.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #171

    @toddy said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @kev random right. The Chiefs disintegrated.

    Very average reffing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SquirrelS Offline
    SquirrelS Offline
    Squirrel
    wrote on last edited by
    #172

    Great forward play!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #173

    Brilliant maul defence and then Havili in quickly to wrap it up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #174

    Why the fuck do teams try and maul vs Crusaders close to the line?

    Why why why.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #175

    Havili is a cut above.
    Definite All Black.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #176

    @kiwimurph said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Why the fuck do teams try and maul vs Crusaders close to the line?

    Why why why.

    They were probably too shocked that they actually won a fucking line out

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #177

    @bones said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @anonymous said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Penalty try surely for that head contact, right?

    I don't know how they can justify it not being. That's a bit weird. It is the crusaders I guess...

    Sorry, you can only get penalty tries from scrums. Foul play is far less serious that a prop slipping over

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #178

    @gunner said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    If that is a penalty how is it not a penalty try?

    Take the offending player out of the play and it’s a try all day.

    Controversial!

    That's a good point that I didn't even think of. 👍🏽

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    1

SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs
Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.