Coronavirus - New Zealand
-
@mn5 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@broughie said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
While I disagree in interrupting a kids game it may be a government funded hospital but don’t forget where the government gets its money. From the people. Whether you like it or not these protestors probably pay taxes and are therefore entitled to hospital care. I am amazed at the disdain that the vaxed have for those who choose not to have the vaccine. You are really showing you colors.
So after 2 years of trying to isolate a microscopic virus with failure now you probably will spend another 2 years figuring out how to manage living with it. Well of course you have your piñata to beat, the unvaxed, instead of blaming your government for the arrogance of containment. They should have focused on those at risk rather than controlling a healthy population. The NZ government has created ruin in peoples lives and brought you to a position where you look down on your fellow man. Don’t blame the unvaxed. Blame the government and the fools that voted for them.
Just want to let you know that if I see you on the street I will not look at you as potentially contagious. I am past the fear of covid. Most of you should be too if you look at then stats and science. I will shake your hand and not look down on you because you choose to obey a government that has their head up their ass.
What have we become?
Showing disdain for the minority fucking things up the rest of us ?
I’m happy to show those colours.
The unvaxxed are "fucking things up" for the rest of you?
Bro, that's some serious fucking arrogance.
-
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@mn5 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@broughie said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
While I disagree in interrupting a kids game it may be a government funded hospital but don’t forget where the government gets its money. From the people. Whether you like it or not these protestors probably pay taxes and are therefore entitled to hospital care. I am amazed at the disdain that the vaxed have for those who choose not to have the vaccine. You are really showing you colors.
So after 2 years of trying to isolate a microscopic virus with failure now you probably will spend another 2 years figuring out how to manage living with it. Well of course you have your piñata to beat, the unvaxed, instead of blaming your government for the arrogance of containment. They should have focused on those at risk rather than controlling a healthy population. The NZ government has created ruin in peoples lives and brought you to a position where you look down on your fellow man. Don’t blame the unvaxed. Blame the government and the fools that voted for them.
Just want to let you know that if I see you on the street I will not look at you as potentially contagious. I am past the fear of covid. Most of you should be too if you look at then stats and science. I will shake your hand and not look down on you because you choose to obey a government that has their head up their ass.
What have we become?
Showing disdain for the minority fucking things up the rest of us ?
I’m happy to show those colours.
The unvaxxed are "fucking things up" for the rest of you?
Bro, that's some serious fucking arrogance.
Actually no they’re not so much anymore, more for themselves. I think the inconvenience of not being able to really go anywhere without a vaccine pass will hopefully spur some of them on to actually getting jabbed.
-
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
-
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
…..and they’re certainly not “heroic” for not getting jabbed which is a term thrown about far too liberally.
They’re free to do what they want, but they’re not free to not suffer from the consequences of doing that, just as none of us really are.
-
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
-
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
It was Brian Tamaki and his lot. That's all I need to know about the purity of their intentions. As for the other part of your argument, which you managed to shoe horn in? I agree we should be freer than we are
-
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
It was Brian Tamaki and his lot. That's all I need to know about the purity of their intentions. As for the other part of your argument, which you managed to shoe horn in? I agree we should be freer than we are
Yep, fuck him and ANYTHING he is involved in. He’s a brilliant con man though I’ll give him that. His ability to fleece things from the stupid is incredible.
-
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
It was Brian Tamaki and his lot. That's all I need to know about the purity of their intentions. As for the other part of your argument, which you managed to shoe horn in? I agree we should be freer than we are
Wtf, I didn't shoehorn it in, I responded to MN5 who said the unvaxxed were fucking up life for everyone, and you responded over that
-
A while ago there was an anecdote about a fern co worker with a vulnerable child at home. The co worker wanted to know his colleagues vaccination status and request he be isolated at work from the unvaccinated.
Fair enough, I get that and his fear that an unvaccinated individual infects him and he passes that infection onto his immuno-compromised child. A potentially life threatening situation for his kid. I understand that he wants to take away that root cause. That sounds in line with the government messaging. No problem.
But what happens if a vaccinated co worker infects him and then he takes that home and his kid dies?
Who does he blame then? How does the current system ensure against that ghastly ( and highly plausible) situation?
I've been mulling that one for weeks.
-
@siam said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
A while ago there was an anecdote about a fern co worker with a vulnerable child at home. The co worker wanted to know his colleagues vaccination status and request he be isolated at work from the unvaccinated.
Fair enough, I get that and his fear that an unvaccinated individual infects him and he passes that infection onto his immuno-compromised child. A potentially life threatening situation for his kid. I understand that he wants to take away that root cause. That sounds in line with the government messaging. No problem.
But what happens if a vaccinated co worker infects him and then he takes that home and his kid dies?
Who does he blame then? How does the current system ensure against that ghastly ( and highly plausible) situation?
I've been mulling that one for weeks.
Horrible situation, but isn't the answer actually pretty simple? The government performs its obligations by enabling the worker and his co-workers to get vaccinated. The business performs its obligations by allowing the worker to isolate at work from any unvaccinated (forcing them to work from home if needed) , or if the worker chooses, to be able to work from home in a safe place of his design.
The challenges arise if the business forces someone to come to work, and doesn't put in place rules around vaccination. That creates an absolute minefield of liability, and there is no clear guidance here in Oz, I imagine the same in NZ?
Any employer who forces staff to work from the office, but doesn't simultaneously enforce vaccinations as a passport to enter the office, is really asking for trouble.
-
@donsteppa said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
If those particular protesters had a half a mind,
That might be the problem.
-
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
It was Brian Tamaki and his lot. That's all I need to know about the purity of their intentions. As for the other part of your argument, which you managed to shoe horn in? I agree we should be freer than we are
Wtf, I didn't shoehorn it in, I responded to MN5 who said the unvaxxed were fucking up life for everyone, and you responded over that
Oh, so in true fern style we are arguing about different things but probably agree about lots else
-
@broughie said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They should have focused on those at risk rather than controlling a healthy population.
The problem is that sounds OK but not in the real world. If you take that approach, you have to effectively long-term quarantine all at-risk sections of society like, say, the over-60's. and/or forcibly vaccinate them to protect them from Covid.
All to allow another section of society to live un-vaccinated and unrestricted lives.
-
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
It was Brian Tamaki and his lot. That's all I need to know about the purity of their intentions. As for the other part of your argument, which you managed to shoe horn in? I agree we should be freer than we are
Wtf, I didn't shoehorn it in, I responded to MN5 who said the unvaxxed were fucking up life for everyone, and you responded over that
Oh, so in true fern style we are arguing about different things but probably agree about lots else
It does amuse me that my throwaway comment started it too.
-
@mn5 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
It was Brian Tamaki and his lot. That's all I need to know about the purity of their intentions. As for the other part of your argument, which you managed to shoe horn in? I agree we should be freer than we are
Wtf, I didn't shoehorn it in, I responded to MN5 who said the unvaxxed were fucking up life for everyone, and you responded over that
Oh, so in true fern style we are arguing about different things but probably agree about lots else
It does amuse me that my throwaway comment started it too.
Covid19 is still a high trigger subject
-
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@mn5 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
It was Brian Tamaki and his lot. That's all I need to know about the purity of their intentions. As for the other part of your argument, which you managed to shoe horn in? I agree we should be freer than we are
Wtf, I didn't shoehorn it in, I responded to MN5 who said the unvaxxed were fucking up life for everyone, and you responded over that
Oh, so in true fern style we are arguing about different things but probably agree about lots else
It does amuse me that my throwaway comment started it too.
Covid19 is still a high trigger subject
Isn’t it just ? So much spite and anger from all sides of the equation
-
@voodoo yeah, agree. Well said. I think it's an endorsement to be able to stay home and work...
But, it may be difficult at scale.
I think it highlights that the blame game and persecutions will ruin all solutions.
It's also a reminder that personal safety is primarily and fundamentally the responsibility of the individual, (the father in this case), not the group.
-
@mn5 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@mn5 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
It was Brian Tamaki and his lot. That's all I need to know about the purity of their intentions. As for the other part of your argument, which you managed to shoe horn in? I agree we should be freer than we are
Wtf, I didn't shoehorn it in, I responded to MN5 who said the unvaxxed were fucking up life for everyone, and you responded over that
Oh, so in true fern style we are arguing about different things but probably agree about lots else
It does amuse me that my throwaway comment started it too.
Covid19 is still a high trigger subject
Isn’t it just ? So much spite and anger from all sides of the equation
Real life consequences. This is one of the greatest challenges to mankind in my lifetime
-
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@mn5 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@mn5 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
It was Brian Tamaki and his lot. That's all I need to know about the purity of their intentions. As for the other part of your argument, which you managed to shoe horn in? I agree we should be freer than we are
Wtf, I didn't shoehorn it in, I responded to MN5 who said the unvaxxed were fucking up life for everyone, and you responded over that
Oh, so in true fern style we are arguing about different things but probably agree about lots else
It does amuse me that my throwaway comment started it too.
Covid19 is still a high trigger subject
Isn’t it just ? So much spite and anger from all sides of the equation
Real life consequences. This is one of the greatest challenges to mankind in my lifetime
These real life consequences you speak of are imposed by the government.
I'm double vaxxed and think everyone should be, but I don't see why it's acceptable to withdraw the right to participate in society from people who don't make the choice to protect themselves. That decision, and the resulting support from the community, has come from the government imposing that on the community and regular people feeling forced into reacting to that.
Happily (and ironically enough), where I live the government is simply not able to do that.
I believe the negative reaction to the idea that"people should just get vaxxed and we get our lives back, fuck these who don't get it" comes from people like me (double-vaxxed who agrees with the sentiment) because we also see that the rule was imposed on society.
-
@gt12 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@mn5 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@mn5 said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@voodoo said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - New Zealand:
They have a choice and they made it. They still get access to health care, they can go to the shops, they can drive. No one is making them wear a yellow star or anything. But don't expect all out compassion from the rest of us who also bear the consequences of their actions. There are things they can't do and at the moment that is the consequence of their choice. They should live with that happy to have a choice, and not ruin someone else's weekend by being inconsiderate fluffybunnies
Before I respond, are you talking about peope that aren't vaxxed, or the people causing disruption at kids cricket?
If the latter, you're at cross purposes, but as you were.
If the former, oh boo fucking hoo for you. We aren't talking about them complaining or asking for "compassion", we are talking about the vaxxed complaining that the unvaxxed are fucking it all up for them.
Well tell you what, how about you direct that ire at the Government where it belongs? Even with our ridiculously high vax rates us vaccinated still can't travel, still face uncertainty and constant rule changes - what makes you think anything would be different at 95% or 98%???
It was Brian Tamaki and his lot. That's all I need to know about the purity of their intentions. As for the other part of your argument, which you managed to shoe horn in? I agree we should be freer than we are
Wtf, I didn't shoehorn it in, I responded to MN5 who said the unvaxxed were fucking up life for everyone, and you responded over that
Oh, so in true fern style we are arguing about different things but probably agree about lots else
It does amuse me that my throwaway comment started it too.
Covid19 is still a high trigger subject
Isn’t it just ? So much spite and anger from all sides of the equation
Real life consequences. This is one of the greatest challenges to mankind in my lifetime
These real life consequences you speak of are imposed by the government.
I'm double vaxxed and think everyone should be, but I don't see why it's acceptable to withdraw the right to participate in society from people who don't make the choice to protect themselves. That decision, and the resulting support from the community, has come from the government imposing that on the community and regular people feeling forced into reacting to that.
Happily (and ironically enough), where I live the government is simply not able to do that.
I believe the negative reaction to the idea that"people should just get vaxxed and we get our lives back, fuck these who don't get it" comes from people like me (double-vaxxed who agrees with the sentiment) because we also see that the rule was imposed on society.
I was actually talking about general consequences of covid19. I have never seen death on this scale this fast down to one disease. Who knows how many more would have died if measures to limit spread, and medical advances hadn't intervened. The other stuff we have all argued back and forth over the issues, most of us have clear positions, not all in alignment.