• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
734 Posts 39 Posters 28.7k Views
Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #494

    @NTA said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    lead nerd

    my next business card 😃

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #495

    amazing how almost all the mainstream press are leading with the explosion headline like the whole thing was a failure

    KiwiwombleK canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #496

    @voodoo havent had a chance to read anything about it so have only seen the headlines, were they testing something and it was meant to explode?

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #497

    @Kiwiwomble said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @voodoo havent had a chance to read anything about it so have only seen the headlines, were they testing something and it was meant to explode?

    Someone else here will explain better, but I think ideally it wouldn't explode, but it definitely wasn't a concern that it did - the whole thing was about the launch which was successful, the rest was cream and data-gathering

    KiwiwombleK KirwanK dogmeatD 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #498

    @voodoo you can see why people might take that spin...generally things exploding when they aren't planned too would be a bad thing

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #499

    I think they were saying something about. As long as it clears the tower then it's a success.

    I noticed in one of the graphics they had that five of the engines hadn't actually ignited or something

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #500

    @Kiwiwomble said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @voodoo you can see why people might take that spin...generally things exploding when they aren't planned too would be a bad thing

    A couple of issues with that statement. It was planned to be dumped into the ocean, but more likely exploded with the flight abort system.

    They have been saying all week that it's likely to explode as this is a prototype, not the finished rocket. The parameters of success for this launch was not to destroy the orbital mount or the launch tower as they only have one of each, and they 6/8 of the starships/boosters ready for the next test in a few months.

    This was a wild success for a rocket that started design in 2019, incredibly fast progress. (@NTA I think seven didn't fire or exloded during ascent).

    This is what their testing iteration looked like on their Falcon 9 landing program. This video is from SpaceX;

    So much dumb shit is written about Elon at the moment, it's best to ignore anyone saying this a negative event. It's literally what they are trying to do. They have been destroying these on the ground with pressure tests as well, was that a "bad thing" too?

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #501

    @voodoo said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @Kiwiwomble said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @voodoo havent had a chance to read anything about it so have only seen the headlines, were they testing something and it was meant to explode?

    Someone else here will explain better, but I think ideally it wouldn't explode, but it definitely wasn't a concern that it did - the whole thing was about the launch which was successful, the rest was cream and data-gathering

    Exactly right.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to NTA on last edited by Kirwan
    #502

    @NTA said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @Kirwan said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    That was worth staying up for, fucking incredible

    Just watched it. Agreed it was unreal.

    Would be nice if the lead nerd on the panel shut up a bit more, so we could hear the mission control dialogue.

    There is a youtube channel for just the mission control audio if that's all you want.

    Use the chapter links, and you can listen live as well for the next one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #503

    @voodoo said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    amazing how almost all the mainstream press are leading with the explosion headline like the whole thing was a failure

    All the odd balls on FB are crowing about that. The commentators said anything after the rocket cleared the tower was gravy, so it was pretty successful

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #504

    @canefan said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @voodoo said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    amazing how almost all the mainstream press are leading with the explosion headline like the whole thing was a failure

    All the odd balls on FB are crowing about that. The commentators said anything after the rocket cleared the tower was gravy, so it was pretty successful

    Newspapers that should know better are too. It's almost like they have an axe to grind....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #505

    i do find this discussion fascinating, completely get the idea they were looking at getting past the tower, that was the real aim for the launch etc

    But, assuming they did actually plan for it to go further and splash down somewhere else and not blow up, i think its still a valid question as to what happened....not at the expense of the primary objective being achieved of course

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #506

    @Kiwiwomble said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    i do find this discussion fascinating, completely get the idea they were looking at getting past the tower, that was the real aim for the launch etc

    But, assuming they did actually plan for it to go further and splash down somewhere else and not blow up, i think its still a valid question as to what happened....not at the expense of the primary objective being achieved of course

    They had a list of 1000s of things they were testing. Fueling, orbital mount releast, aborts, flight abort system, firing 30+ rockets, getting off the tower, getting past maxQ, etc, etc

    They got way further down the list than they expected, and are ready with the next improved booster already, and further iterations will get improvements from the data received from this launch.

    They have a modus operandi of fail fast. It's how they can develop new capabilities like a fully resuable rocket.

    So it's less that it's not a valid question you are asking, it's more a very obvious one, what happened is an incredibly successful test. The test was to push their current design and see what margins need to be improved.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #507

    @Kirwan apologies, those of us that dont follow these things that closely or if im honest just dont understand a lot of the technical stuff even when its explained can sometime only ask the really obvious (to those who know so much more) questions

    The whole approach of casual acceptance of something so expensive and potentially important exploding when not inherently planned for is also a different approach to lots of other industries, great that is par for the course for them, but the instinctual through for a lot of average people i believe would be WOW, what happened?

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #508

    @Kiwiwomble said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @Kirwan apologies, those of us that dont follow these things that closely or if im honest just dont understand a lot of the technical stuff even when its explained can sometime only ask the really obvious (to those who know so much more) questions

    The whole approach of casual acceptance of something so expensive and potentially important exploding when not inherently planned for is also a different approach to lots of other industries, great that is par for the course for them, but the instinctual through for a lot of average people i believe would be WOW, what happened?

    Fair. You don't normally see these tests, all rockets explode while in development. SpaceX is trying to drive up enthusaiusm for their goals with spaceflight, so you get to see the sausage being made. As they say, explosions are exciting.

    You keep saying it's not planned to explode, they absolutely are planned to explode during development. They are testing to failure to find out where the safetly margins are.

    There were fun ones on the ground where they ramped up pressuration tests and crushed the thing like a beer can. They need to know what the failure amount was so they know the capapability of the vehicle.

    These tests are why they have landed 100 Falcons without incident and have been safety rated for astronauts for Dragon. They have done their due diligence and know how safely operate their rocket systems.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #509

    @Kirwan said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @Kiwiwomble said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @Kirwan apologies, those of us that dont follow these things that closely or if im honest just dont understand a lot of the technical stuff even when its explained can sometime only ask the really obvious (to those who know so much more) questions

    The whole approach of casual acceptance of something so expensive and potentially important exploding when not inherently planned for is also a different approach to lots of other industries, great that is par for the course for them, but the instinctual through for a lot of average people i believe would be WOW, what happened?

    You keep saying it's not planned to explode, they absolutely are planned to explode during development. They are testing to failure to find out where the safetly margins are.

    In fairness, that was my original question, was it planned to explode or had something gone "wrong" even after 100's or 1000's of things had gone "right" beforehand

    I can completely understand the idea of testing till failure if that had been the answer to my first question

    @Kiwiwomble said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    @voodoo havent had a chance to read anything about it so have only seen the headlines, were they testing something and it was meant to explode?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #510

    Could almost post this in why old media is dying.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by Machpants
    #511

    @Kirwan said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    Could almost post this in why old media is dying.

    Not so much old media dying, as more old media having to chase click bait titles of new media to stay relevant, IMO.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #512

    @voodoo said in Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab:

    Someone else here will explain better, but I think ideally it wouldn't explode,

    the 'lead nerd' described it as sub-optimal 🙂

    It clearly wasn't the perfect mission, but things seldom are. They will learn so much from the four-minute flight. In may ways a 'failure' is the best result. The way humans are wired we seem to learn more from our mistakes than our successes.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #513

    @Machpants that's just another way to say dying.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Space - Spacex, NASA, Rocket Lab
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.