• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
286 Posts 41 Posters 14.8k Views
Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #261

    @Kirwan said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    @Stargazer call it what you like, but it's also the Fern way to call bullshit on made up stuff.

    I'm confused. Am I making up that there is silence from the Blues?

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #262

    I did wonder a while back if the Blues were making a mess of recruitment when it was reported that they had missed out on two preferred candidates. Just stating what was reported as fact and wondering if that would impact things with further candidates knowing they re at least 3rd preference.
    No agenda or narrative in that.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #263

    @Crucial You forgetting what you write?

    "they are waiting for other teams to throw them the candidates they don't want"

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #264

    @Crucial said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    I did wonder a while back if the Blues were making a mess of recruitment when it was reported that they had missed out on two preferred candidates. Just stating what was reported as fact and wondering if that would impact things with further candidates knowing they re at least 3rd preference.
    No agenda or narrative in that.

    Any my point is that you (and all of us) have no idea who their preferred candidates are, just lots of speculation in the press. Unlike other orgs, the Blues have kept quiet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #265

    @Kirwan said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    @Crucial You forgetting what you write?

    "they are waiting for other teams to throw them the candidates they don't want"

    Nice editing out of the word 'or'. My poor punctuation in missing the question mark but that word makes it clearly a question.

    Speculation and raising questions is a big part of a discussion board is it not?

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #266

    @Crucial said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    @Kirwan said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    @Crucial You forgetting what you write?

    "they are waiting for other teams to throw them the candidates they don't want"

    Nice editing out of the word 'or'. My poor punctuation in missing the question mark but that word makes it clearly a question.

    Speculation and raising questions is a big part of a discussion board is it not?

    As is pointing out when speculation is unfounded and verring into fantasyland. You do know a discussion is two way right?

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by Crucial
    #267

    @Kirwan said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    @Crucial said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    @Kirwan said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    @Crucial You forgetting what you write?

    "they are waiting for other teams to throw them the candidates they don't want"

    Nice editing out of the word 'or'. My poor punctuation in missing the question mark but that word makes it clearly a question.

    Speculation and raising questions is a big part of a discussion board is it not?

    As is pointing out when speculation is unfounded and verring into fantasyland. You do know a discussion is two way right?

    How is it unfounded when there are no clear known options? Of course there will be speculation just as the press have done. So far they have been 'in the know' around the Saders and Canes so it's valid to wonder why not the Blues.
    You keep stating that they are great at keeping quiet. You have as much proof of that as I have of them scrambling.

    I'm happy for discussion around it, just not having my posts called bullshit, being accused of pushing a narrative or implication that my speculation is any more unfounded than your own.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #268

    Your comment about "OR they are waiting for other teams to throw them the candidates they don't want" is unfounded bullshit.

    Just because journalists don't know who the options are doesn't meant here are no clear options. As I said, it looks like the Blues (based on the lack of leaks) are treating the hiring process with a bit more privacy than other orgs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #269

    @Kirwan said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    Just because journalists don't know who the options are doesn't meant here are no clear options. As I said, it looks like the Blues (based on the lack of leaks) are treating the hiring process with a bit more privacy than other orgs.

    Where have I heard that before? That's right I typed this just before the bit you (mis(quoted)

    @Crucial said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    The deathly silence from Auckland implies either some behind the scenes recruiting that the gossip grapevine isn't picking up on

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #270

    I know you don't like being corrected, but you were not misquoted. You said something stupid, implying you (or some journalists) knew who the Blues choices were and were being gazumped, when in reality you have no idea.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #271

    At least you've adjusted to 'it looks like' instead of stating it as fact.

    @Kirwan said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    Unlike other orgs, the Blues have kept quiet.

    Other orgs haven't made statements until their signing was done but the press managed to find out what what was going on. Have they kept quiet or is there not much to find out? Valid question IMO.

    There has been rumour that Coventry isn't happy about the situation but that could also be speculation as Blues have stated that they are looking for "an elder statesman"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #272

    @Kirwan said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    I know you don't like being corrected, but you were not misquoted. You said something stupid, implying you (or some journalists) knew who the Blues choices were and were being gazumped, when in reality you have no idea.

    Of course I have no idea, nor do you.

    You've twisted this in a negative way.

    I'm not implying that they are being gazumped at all. eg Cotter may have been sounded out by Saders and Blues but had already done his application/proposal to Saders so asked to wait for the outcome.
    That's just two franchises competing for one coach. Nothing bad about that. One will be the candidate's preference and they could end up that franchise's discard. My implication was that Blues could be waiting.
    Maybe they see him as a good fit for them so are happy to let it play out.
    Who else fits the 'elder statesman' criteria? I'm struggling to think of anyone currently available.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #273

    At least you have stopped trying to make stuff up.

    As I said, from the lacks of leaks it looks like the Blues are treating the hiring process with more privacy - or the people in the running a less inclined to speak to the press.

    Your attempts to read tea leaves from silence is very much 2 + 2 = 20.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #274

    @Crucial said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    @Kirwan said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    I know you don't like being corrected, but you were not misquoted. You said something stupid, implying you (or some journalists) knew who the Blues choices were and were being gazumped, when in reality you have no idea.

    Of course I have no idea, nor do you.

    Never said I did. You are the one making silly comments based on nothing.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #275

    @Kirwan said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    Your attempts to read tea leaves from silence is very much 2 + 2 = 20.

    I think someone else explained that already

    @Stargazer said in Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion:

    @Kirwan That's not pushing a narrative. It's just speculating about possible reasons for the "silence" at the Blues. It's a quite normal thing to do on the Fern if there are no clear answers.

    Making stuff up? Speculation?

    Potayto/potahto

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #276

    And again, when you something stupid, and then double down on it, you have to just take the correction. You can keep trying to argue it all you like.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #277
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #278

    I deleted the last post because this is getting boring. Particularly when it gets to the "stop picking on me" bullshit because you don't like people disagreeing with you

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #279

    Does anyone know what Jason O'Halloran doing now?

    He's no longer listed as the attack coach at Suntory.

    https://www.suntory.com/culture-sports/sungoliath/squad/

    It blows my mind that he hasn't been approached by any SR franchises.

    His CV reads, 2011 & 2010 U20 attack coach, best Manawatu coach ever, Scotland asst. 2015-2017, Glasgow asst. 2016-20, Suntory attack coach 2021-2022 (2 time finalist & most tries scored in both seasons) and once he leaves Suntory (2023) their performance drops. I can't think of many who are anywhere near as successful coaching in NZ at the moment.

    StargazerS CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to kiwi_expat on last edited by Stargazer
    #280

    @kiwi_expat That drop to finishing fourth in the 2023 Japan League One happened while he was still their assistant coach.

    His departure from Sungoliath was only announced two weeks ago.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Next Blues, Crusaders, Hurricanes coach discussion
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.