• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
brumbieshurricanes
423 Posts 51 Posters 18.8k Views
QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by Winger
    #14

    @Canes4life If love was fit enough for a replacement vs the crusaders ... I would start him with Moorby on the wing. Give him game time to get match hardened for the semi and final if we get this far

    Moorby plays with a running wing mindset. Love reads the game much better and either runs, passes or kicks as appropriate. He's a much better FB

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Number 10N Offline
    Number 10N Offline
    Number 10
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Referee Nic Berry

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to Number 10 on last edited by Canes4life
    #16

    @Number-10 is that a good thing? I haven’t watched him in a while.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #17

    @Canes4life Berry is all over the shop but then he's not alone on that front. All the QF refs have their issues. Pick your poison

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    The Chiefs have had Berry in the last 2 games, and I have been generally happy. I like that he calls out the halfbacks who try to milk a penalty at the ruck.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    First rule of thumb is not to get hung up on who refs. You obviously have a peek at what he looks at, but they shouldn't think on it much.

    And as a supporter never worries me who ref is, I never allow it as an excuse anyway.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to foobaNZ on last edited by
    #20

    @foobaNZ said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    Is it too much to ask to drop Blackwell? Just once please Holland.

    I'd love an IWL & Sangster second row.

    Canberra is a graveyard for us but this group should surely be up for it after exiting there twice in recent history as you say.

    He won't. As the coaches just have a blind spot and don't understand the importance of a good lineout. It's easy to blame Holland but Gibbes must also agree. We were just lucky last WE that Whitelock went at HT as our lineout was struggling up until then. Otherwise their selection are good. I don't agree 100% but have no WTF is going on reaction. But having a short lineout is a disaster against the top sides. They need a lot of luck to win. Like Whitelock going off. Or 3 tries in the last 15 vs the Blues.

    Wellington selected Blackwell at lock. But the coaches were smart enough to select a tall lock with him (Bird 2.04) and another good lineout option at 6 (Delany 1.95) So the Wellington lineout was a strength not a weakness.

    But the Canes ignore Bird. He should be selected to start if Blackwell is the other lock. I would also start Delany at 6 but only if Blackwell starts. My preference would be Bird and IWL to start. Flanders at 6 and Delany and Sangster as replacements so we would always have a strong lineout. Savea cover 7 and Flanders 8.

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Canes to tip the ponies over in Canberra and end the Australian finals charge by 10pm Saturday

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #22

    @Winger said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    @foobaNZ said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    Is it too much to ask to drop Blackwell? Just once please Holland.

    I'd love an IWL & Sangster second row.

    Canberra is a graveyard for us but this group should surely be up for it after exiting there twice in recent history as you say.

    He won't. As the coaches just have a blind spot and don't understand the importance of a good lineout. It's easy to blame Holland but Gibbes must also agree. We were just lucky last WE that Whitelock went at HT as our lineout was struggling up until then. Otherwise their selection are good. I don't agree 100% but have no WTF is going on reaction. But having a short lineout is a disaster against the top sides. They need a lot of luck to win. Like Whitelock going off. Or 3 tries in the last 15 vs the Blues.

    Wellington selected Blackwell at lock. But the coaches were smart enough to select a tall lock with him (Bird 2.04) and another good lineout option at 6 (Delany 1.95) So the Wellington lineout was a strength not a weakness.

    But the Canes ignore Bird. He should be selected to start if Blackwell is the other lock. I would also start Delany at 6 but only if Blackwell starts. My preference would be Bird and IWL to start. Flanders at 6 and Delany and Sangster as replacements so we would always have a strong lineout. Savea cover 7 and Flanders 8.

    I am sure the coaches realise the importance of lineout, I quite sure is us keyboard warriors do , they know a lot more than us. They also will no doubt way up general play, scrumming ability and everything else that is involved in a game of rugby. They just don't watch game on tv, but whole thing.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    foobaNZ
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #23

    @Dan54 said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    @Winger said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    @foobaNZ said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    Is it too much to ask to drop Blackwell? Just once please Holland.

    I'd love an IWL & Sangster second row.

    Canberra is a graveyard for us but this group should surely be up for it after exiting there twice in recent history as you say.

    He won't. As the coaches just have a blind spot and don't understand the importance of a good lineout. It's easy to blame Holland but Gibbes must also agree. We were just lucky last WE that Whitelock went at HT as our lineout was struggling up until then. Otherwise their selection are good. I don't agree 100% but have no WTF is going on reaction. But having a short lineout is a disaster against the top sides. They need a lot of luck to win. Like Whitelock going off. Or 3 tries in the last 15 vs the Blues.

    Wellington selected Blackwell at lock. But the coaches were smart enough to select a tall lock with him (Bird 2.04) and another good lineout option at 6 (Delany 1.95) So the Wellington lineout was a strength not a weakness.

    But the Canes ignore Bird. He should be selected to start if Blackwell is the other lock. I would also start Delany at 6 but only if Blackwell starts. My preference would be Bird and IWL to start. Flanders at 6 and Delany and Sangster as replacements so we would always have a strong lineout. Savea cover 7 and Flanders 8.

    I am sure the coaches realise the importance of lineout, I quite sure is us keyboard warriors do , they know a lot more than us. They also will no doubt way up general play, scrumming ability and everything else that is involved in a game of rugby. They just don't watch game on tv, but whole thing.

    I dunno. Our lineout has been dreadful.

    Blackwell not all to blame but a bigger body would no doubt help in the air. We won't win anything with a 50/50 line out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Screenshot 2023-06-07 at 3.02.56 PM.png

    Hurricanes v Brumbies

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Same QF as last year

    Canes had a healthy lead and then conceded the last 20 points

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Looking at the starters in that game you could argue we have a stronger team than last year and they look to have a slightly weaker side. They no longer have Fainga'a and Banks, and we will likely have a healthy Flanders starting instead of Gibson, Cameron starting instead of Morgan, Lomax starting instead of Franks, and we don't have a flakey Rayasi on the wing.

    We've got this. 😃

    ACT CrusaderA canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to Duluth on last edited by Canes4life
    #27

    @Duluth jeez that's a shocking record isn't it. Mind you they must have a pretty awful record in Wellington because isn't the head to head overall quite close?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #28

    @Canes4life said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    Looking at the starters in that game you could argue we have a stronger team than last year and they look to have a slightly weaker side. They no longer have Fainga'a and Banks, and we will likely have a healthy Flanders starting instead of Gibson, Cameron starting instead of Morgan, Lomax starting instead of Franks, and we don't have a flakey Rayasi on the wing.

    We've got this. 😃

    And let’s not forget you have Ardie Savea, the only current NZ player to make the greatest team of the professional era…

    In da bag uce

    nostrildamusN kiwi_expatK 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #29

    @Canes4life said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    Looking at the starters in that game you could argue we have a stronger team than last year and they look to have a slightly weaker side. They no longer have Fainga'a and Banks, and we will likely have a healthy Flanders starting instead of Gibson, Cameron starting instead of Morgan, Lomax starting instead of Franks, and we don't have a flakey Rayasi on the wing.

    We've got this. 😃

    As long as Booth doesn't get 20 minutes...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #30

    @ACT-Crusader said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    And let’s not forget you have Ardie Savea, the only current NZ player to make the greatest team of the professional era…

    In da bag uce

    Only if he plays at 6 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by kiwi_expat
    #31

    @ACT-Crusader said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    @Canes4life said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:

    Looking at the starters in that game you could argue we have a stronger team than last year and they look to have a slightly weaker side. They no longer have Fainga'a and Banks, and we will likely have a healthy Flanders starting instead of Gibson, Cameron starting instead of Morgan, Lomax starting instead of Franks, and we don't have a flakey Rayasi on the wing.

    We've got this. 😃

    And let’s not forget you have Ardie Savea, the only current NZ player to make the greatest team of the professional era…

    Sure, as an impact utility. Collins, McCaw & Read start for me.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by Duluth
    #32

    Hurricanes Named for Quarter-Final Clash in Canberra

    Hurricanes Named for Quarter-Final Clash in Canberra

    1 Xavier Numia
    2 Dane Coles
    3 Tyrel Lomax (50th Hurricanes Game)
    4 James Blackwell
    5 Caleb Delany
    6 Devan Flanders
    7 Ardie Savea (Captain)
    8 Brayden Iose
    9 Cam Roigard
    10 Brett Cameron
    11 Kini Naholo
    12 Jordie Barrett
    13 Billy Proctor
    14 Daniel Sinkinson
    15 Josh Moorby

    Replacements
    16 Asafo Aumua
    17 Tevita Mafileo
    18 Owen Franks
    19 Isaia Walker-Leawere
    20 Du’Plessis Kirifi
    21 Jamie Booth
    22 Ruben Love
    23 Bailyn Sullivan

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by Duluth
    #33

    James Slipper, Lachlan Lonergan, Sefo Kautai, Nick Frost, Cadeyrn Neville, Tom Hooper, Jahrome Brown, Pete Samu, Nic White (c), Jack Debreczeni, Ollie Sapsford, Tamati Tua, Len Ikitau, Andy Muirhead, Tom Wright

    Reserves: Connal McInerney, Blake Schoupp, Rhys Van Nek, Tom Hooper, Luke Reimer, Ryan Lonergan, Noah Lolesio, Jesse Mogg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes
Rugby Matches
brumbieshurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.