• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Rugby World Cup general discussion

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
rwc
1.2k Posts 82 Posters 97.9k Views
Rugby World Cup general discussion
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #238

    @MajorRage said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @KiwiMurph said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @MajorRage said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Those Ireland odds are unbelievable. What am I missing

    Never having won a knock out RWC game and having to face either the home team France or the ABs in a quarter might have something to do with it......

    Does it matter who you face in a QF? NZ/France are going to have equally tricky opposition and it hasn't affected their odds.

    Certainly got a point on the lack of knockout victory, but 5/1 compared to NZ France odds just seems wrong to me.

    Kinda related, but have to mention my only issue I have with winning or losing v France is the nagging fear we could lose v Italy.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #239

    @booboo Are you a doomer now? That will never happen.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Tim on last edited by booboo
    #240

    @Tim I'd rather just not have to worry about the extreme outside possibility.

    Just beat France .

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #241

    Well we did draw 0-0 with Italy at the last RWC......

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #242

    Ireland already distracted, lording it up in Portugal with the rich and famous.

    Cunch of bunts.

    FB_IMG_1691762477136.jpg

    sparkyS canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #243

    @Bones We’ve got Roy Keane to thank for Wayne Smith never taking the England job.

    PJ Browne  /  Rugby

    Talk From Roy Keane Turned All Blacks Legend Off England Job | Balls.ie

    Talk From Roy Keane Turned All Blacks Legend Off England Job | Balls.ie

    All Blacks coaching legend Wayne Smith says that an after dinner talk from Roy Keane turned him off taking the England job.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #244

    @gt12 said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @antipodean said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @booboo said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Doesn't a tackle create an offside line?

    Or just a gate?

    Offside line.

    I don't understand why they aren't in breach of 14.8c

    8. Other players must :
    a. Remain on their feet and release the ball and the ball-carrier immediately.
    b. Remain on their feet when they play the ball.
    c. Arrive at the tackle from the direction of their own goal line before playing the ball.
    d. Not play the ball or attempt to tackle an opponent while on the ground
    near the tackle.
    

    I guess the purpose is to avoid an offside line being formed to get around law 14.10? I think it's very flimsy but if they take out the player before they are over the ball, there may not be an offside line?

    Offside lines are created at a tackle when at least one player is on their feet and over the ball, which is on the ground. Each team ís offside line runs parallel to the goal line through the hindmost point of any player in the tackle or on their feet over the ball. If that point is on or behind the goal line, the offside line for that team is the goal line.
    

    More generally, when was the last time you saw innovation like this from NZ teams? Feels like we are reacting to the world these days, not innovating with new ideas, systems or loophole exploitation

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #245

    @Bones said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Ireland already distracted, lording it up in Portugal with the rich and famous.

    Cunch of bunts.

    FB_IMG_1691762477136.jpg

    Reminds me of us holidaying in the middle of RWC 2007(?)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #246

    @nzzp said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @gt12 said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @antipodean said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @booboo said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Doesn't a tackle create an offside line?

    Or just a gate?

    Offside line.

    I don't understand why they aren't in breach of 14.8c

    8. Other players must :
    a. Remain on their feet and release the ball and the ball-carrier immediately.
    b. Remain on their feet when they play the ball.
    c. Arrive at the tackle from the direction of their own goal line before playing the ball.
    d. Not play the ball or attempt to tackle an opponent while on the ground
    near the tackle.
    

    I guess the purpose is to avoid an offside line being formed to get around law 14.10? I think it's very flimsy but if they take out the player before they are over the ball, there may not be an offside line?

    Offside lines are created at a tackle when at least one player is on their feet and over the ball, which is on the ground. Each team ís offside line runs parallel to the goal line through the hindmost point of any player in the tackle or on their feet over the ball. If that point is on or behind the goal line, the offside line for that team is the goal line.
    

    More generally, when was the last time you saw innovation like this from NZ teams? Feels like we are reacting to the world these days, not innovating with new ideas, systems or loophole exploitation

    Because it's cheating and will get stopped. I expect this will be punished in future games.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #247

    @booboo said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @nzzp said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @gt12 said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @antipodean said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @booboo said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Doesn't a tackle create an offside line?

    Or just a gate?

    Offside line.

    I don't understand why they aren't in breach of 14.8c

    8. Other players must :
    a. Remain on their feet and release the ball and the ball-carrier immediately.
    b. Remain on their feet when they play the ball.
    c. Arrive at the tackle from the direction of their own goal line before playing the ball.
    d. Not play the ball or attempt to tackle an opponent while on the ground
    near the tackle.
    

    I guess the purpose is to avoid an offside line being formed to get around law 14.10? I think it's very flimsy but if they take out the player before they are over the ball, there may not be an offside line?

    Offside lines are created at a tackle when at least one player is on their feet and over the ball, which is on the ground. Each team ís offside line runs parallel to the goal line through the hindmost point of any player in the tackle or on their feet over the ball. If that point is on or behind the goal line, the offside line for that team is the goal line.
    

    More generally, when was the last time you saw innovation like this from NZ teams? Feels like we are reacting to the world these days, not innovating with new ideas, systems or loophole exploitation

    Because it's cheating and will get stopped. I expect this will be punished in future games.

    I agree.

    Do you think the ABs are innovating at the moment? I haven't seen it, not for years

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #248

    @nzzp said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @booboo said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @nzzp said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @gt12 said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @antipodean said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @booboo said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Doesn't a tackle create an offside line?

    Or just a gate?

    Offside line.

    I don't understand why they aren't in breach of 14.8c

    8. Other players must :
    a. Remain on their feet and release the ball and the ball-carrier immediately.
    b. Remain on their feet when they play the ball.
    c. Arrive at the tackle from the direction of their own goal line before playing the ball.
    d. Not play the ball or attempt to tackle an opponent while on the ground
    near the tackle.
    

    I guess the purpose is to avoid an offside line being formed to get around law 14.10? I think it's very flimsy but if they take out the player before they are over the ball, there may not be an offside line?

    Offside lines are created at a tackle when at least one player is on their feet and over the ball, which is on the ground. Each team ís offside line runs parallel to the goal line through the hindmost point of any player in the tackle or on their feet over the ball. If that point is on or behind the goal line, the offside line for that team is the goal line.
    

    More generally, when was the last time you saw innovation like this from NZ teams? Feels like we are reacting to the world these days, not innovating with new ideas, systems or loophole exploitation

    Because it's cheating and will get stopped. I expect this will be punished in future games.

    I agree.

    Do you think the ABs are innovating at the moment? I haven't seen it, not for years

    The short passing amongst the forwards this season has been great to watch - a wonderful change from the overdone pod system.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #249

    @KiwiMurph said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @nzzp said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @booboo said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @nzzp said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @gt12 said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @antipodean said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @booboo said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Doesn't a tackle create an offside line?

    Or just a gate?

    Offside line.

    I don't understand why they aren't in breach of 14.8c

    8. Other players must :
    a. Remain on their feet and release the ball and the ball-carrier immediately.
    b. Remain on their feet when they play the ball.
    c. Arrive at the tackle from the direction of their own goal line before playing the ball.
    d. Not play the ball or attempt to tackle an opponent while on the ground
    near the tackle.
    

    I guess the purpose is to avoid an offside line being formed to get around law 14.10? I think it's very flimsy but if they take out the player before they are over the ball, there may not be an offside line?

    Offside lines are created at a tackle when at least one player is on their feet and over the ball, which is on the ground. Each team ís offside line runs parallel to the goal line through the hindmost point of any player in the tackle or on their feet over the ball. If that point is on or behind the goal line, the offside line for that team is the goal line.
    

    More generally, when was the last time you saw innovation like this from NZ teams? Feels like we are reacting to the world these days, not innovating with new ideas, systems or loophole exploitation

    Because it's cheating and will get stopped. I expect this will be punished in future games.

    I agree.

    Do you think the ABs are innovating at the moment? I haven't seen it, not for years

    The short passing amongst the forwards this season has been great to watch - a wonderful change from the overdone pod system.

    agree.

    Did we pioneer pods? I thought we had - it's that kind of thing I'd liek to see us at the forefront of

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #250

    Did we start using the cross kick from 10? I'm happy were not using it as much as we were last season....

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #251

    @canefan said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Did we start using the cross kick from 10? I'm happy were not using it as much as we were last season....

    whoever innovated the midfield bomb needs to be beaten

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #252

    @nzzp said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Did we pioneer pods? I thought we had - it's that kind of thing I'd liek to see us at the forefront of

    I though Henry or Hansen bought a version of it back from the NH? Crusaders created one of the patterns (2-4-2 I think?)

    Hard to imagine pods going away, maybe different splits?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #253

    Don't think too many other countries have cottoned on to our specialist left wing bench spot innovation yet.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to reprobate on last edited by Bones
    #254

    @reprobate said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Don't think too many other countries have cottoned on to our specialist left wing bench spot innovation yet.

    You just wait until they replace ALB with DMac and have a 5-2 split, so that we finally achieve a whole backline of first fives and wings.

    Edit: and still have a spare wing on the bench.

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #255

    @Bones said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @reprobate said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Don't think too many other countries have cottoned on to our specialist left wing bench spot innovation yet.

    You just wait until they replace ALB with DMac and have a 5-2 split, so that we finally achieve a whole backline of first fives and wings.

    Edit: and still have a spare wing on the bench.

    sounds like a golden KFC sponsorship opportunity.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #256

    @nostrildamus I haven't tried the first fives from KFC. Are they as good as crusaders ones?

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #257

    @Bones said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @nostrildamus I haven't tried the first fives from KFC. Are they as good as crusaders ones?

    I can recommend the 10 nugget combo. Just haven't tasted it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Rugby World Cup general discussion
Sports Talk
rwc
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.