NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry)
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@antipodean You can solve that by letting the team with the two injuries play with 14 men during the scrum, and then allowing a fifteenth player on after the next stoppage.
No. You're missing the point. A team may elect to swap out a tight forward for more pace.
Anyway, well done Auckland. Brilliant final.
-
Fucking awesome! The boy is super stoked with that! He's dancing around the room
What a comeback given the conditions - said they'd need some magic and they produced a fair bit with Akira leading the charge.
Credit to both teams, the skills on display in the wet were outstanding. The game didn't deteriorate at all, in fact it seemed to improve.
-
-
@antipodean said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@antipodean You can solve that by letting the team with the two injuries play with 14 men during the scrum, and then allowing a fifteenth player on after the next stoppage.
No. You're missing the point. A team may elect to swap out a tight forward for more pace.
Anyway, well done Auckland. Brilliant final.
You can solve that by ruling that the replacement player must be a prop, if both hookers are injured.
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@antipodean said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@antipodean You can solve that by letting the team with the two injuries play with 14 men during the scrum, and then allowing a fifteenth player on after the next stoppage.
No. You're missing the point. A team may elect to swap out a tight forward for more pace.
Anyway, well done Auckland. Brilliant final.
You can solve that by ruling that the replacement player must be a prop, if both hookers are injured.
And if you don't have a prop left?
This isn't difficult to understand.
-
@antipodean They could allow bringing on a prop who has been replaced.
-
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@antipodean You can solve that by letting the team with the two injuries play with 14 men during the scrum, and then allowing a fifteenth player on after the next stoppage.
Can you imagine how much extra fucking around at every stoppage that would entail? For that reason alone it's a terrible idea.
-
@stargazer said in NPC Final - Auckland vs Canterbury (free entry):
@antipodean They could allow bringing on a prop who has been replaced.
What if they're injured? Instead of trying to make something fucking complex, accept it's a simple solution.
-
With 1:30 left the rain came over my house and sky decided it was too hard to get a signal dammit.
Great game. Congrats Auckland, great comeback.
Good for the comp to have them win IMO.Shit i'd rather have Akira AND Seu in the ABs ahead of about 5 of the Highlanders loose forwards. Would take Plummer ahead of Cameron too.
Biggest moment of the game was Ruru getting dragged.
-
@antipodean It's an unfair solution though. Two injured hookers and two injured props. Theoretical situation, but then you'd go for a (replaced) lock.
