• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

2019 Cricket ODI WC

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.0k Posts 67 Posters 72.1k Views
2019 Cricket ODI WC
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #916

    Pulled them back in now a bit.

    Sustained run rate like that is hard. Better to try for 6 then accelerate I reckon

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #917

    Eoin Morgan will get nothing but short balls the rest of this CWC

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #918

    @NTA said in 2019 Cricket ODI WC:

    Eoin Morgan will get nothing but short balls the rest of this CWC

    I think it's fair to say he's been worked out

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #919

    @canefan like Steve Waugh: he will have to put away childish things if he wants to complete himself as a batsman

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #920

    @NTA said in 2019 Cricket ODI WC:

    @canefan like Steve Waugh: he will have to put away childish things if he wants to complete himself as a batsman

    Same as Maxwell. Sometimes it isn't helpful to be able to play all the shots. Mark Richardson averaged 40+ and only had about 3 shots

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #921

    Root tries a silly shot when it would have been a half volley drive for 4.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #922

    Won't make 350 now by the looks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #923

    Two of the recent wickets would have been called Wide if they'd been left alone

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #924
    1. About 30 less than they probably wanted.

    India won't be threatened by that.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #925

    @NTA They really didn't need to slog. The platform was set, they just had to keep accumulating. An imposing total (apparently it will be the highest ever successful run chase in CWC history?) but the Indians are loaded with batting

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by
    #926

    India well behind on the worm.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by mofitzy_
    #927

    India 306 total. They started slow but the batting in the last 10 overs was ridiculously safe considering they had a chaseable target and wickets in hand.

    Massive game on Wednesday - England needs to win as Pakistan will almost certainly roll the Bangles on Friday. Luckily for us the Pakistan RR is much worse than ours but we still need a tight game at the very least and ideally a win.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #928

    Yep. Inevitable that England won this because we needed them to lose.

    We're not making the semis.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #929

    @booboo if we don't make it I don't think we can argue that it wasn't undeserved. We got a free point against India, dodged a bullet against SA and WI, and our batting crumbled against Aussie. And our opening pair probably average in single figures for the whole tournament

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #930

    @canefan said in 2019 Cricket ODI WC:

    @booboo if we don't make it I don't think we can argue that it wasn't undeserved. We got a free point against India, dodged a bullet against SA and WI, and our batting crumbled against Aussie. And our opening pair probably average in single figures for the whole tournament

    I'm going back to my stance that making the Semis is a win for us- we've performed as expected. The Media really wound up on us as we beat lower ranked sides, but we struggle to consistently win against classy opposition. Fourth in the world is a good result for us - and realistically, we're touch and go with Pakistan.

    canefanC mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #931

    @nzzp totally agree. 4th is the best we can realistically hope for. Unless Guppy suddenly discovers 2015 level form, we get peak Kane and Disco, and the other batters manage to contribute. All in the same game. 3 times.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by
    #932

    England were poor v SL and Aus then looked like world beaters v India. Here's hoping we can have a similar turnaround.

    Pakistan RR= -0.792
    NZ RR = +0.572

    If it comes down to RR it will probably be tight.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to mofitzy_ on last edited by
    #933

    @mofitzy_ said in 2019 Cricket ODI WC:

    England were poor v SL and Aus then looked like world beaters v India. Here's hoping we can have a similar turnaround.

    Pakistan RR= -0.792
    NZ RR = +0.572

    If it comes down to RR it will probably be tight.

    Yep - that heavy loss was as bad as it gets. If we get pumped again, and the Bangles get smashed, that could be us done.

    That said, if we lose heavily to Aus and England, and don't play India, and lose to Pakistan we don't deserve to make the semis.

    Great tournament though - it just rolls on, and damn near every game means somethign

    mofitzy_M CyclopsC 2 Replies Last reply
    6
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #934

    @nzzp said in 2019 Cricket ODI WC:

    @mofitzy_ said in 2019 Cricket ODI WC:

    England were poor v SL and Aus then looked like world beaters v India. Here's hoping we can have a similar turnaround.

    Pakistan RR= -0.792
    NZ RR = +0.572

    If it comes down to RR it will probably be tight.

    Yep - that heavy loss was as bad as it gets. If we get pumped again, and the Bangles get smashed, that could be us done.

    That said, if we lose heavily to Aus and England, and don't play India, and lose to Pakistan we don't deserve to make the semis.

    Agree 100%.

    Weirdly the Bangles still have an outside chance of making the semis. Very unlikely but with the vagaries of sport they could still upset Pakistan and the result on Wednesday won't matter.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #935

    Net Run Rate - basically it's our average RPO rate batting, minus the average RPO against us. I think that means that changing it at th eback end of the tournament is damn hard -- so we should be OK given we've played 7 games so far. Would need a hell of a loss.

    “A team’s net run rate is calculated by deducting from the average runs per over scored by that team throughout the competition, the average runs per over scored against that team throughout the competition.

    “In the event of a team being all out in less than its full quota of overs, the calculation of its net run rate shall be based on the full quota of overs to which it would have been entitled and not on the number of overs in which the team was dismissed.

    “Only those matches where results are achieved will count for the purpose of net run rate calculations. Where a match is abandoned, but a result is achieved under Duckworth/Lewis/Stern, for net run rate purposes Team 1 will be credited with Team 2’s Par Score on abandonment off the same number of overs faced by Team 2. Where a match is concluded with Duckworth/Lewis/Stern having been applied at an earlier point in the match, Team 1 will be credited with 1 run less than the final Target Score for Team 2 off the total number of overs allocated to Team 2 to reach the target.”
    source:
    https://inews.co.uk/sport/cricket/net-run-rate-how-calculated-cricket-world-cup-2019-semi-finals-tiebreak-explained/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

2019 Cricket ODI WC
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.