• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Rugby World Cup general discussion

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
rwc
1.2k Posts 82 Posters 97.9k Views
Rugby World Cup general discussion
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #511

    They could have at least dropped him down to 3 weeks like Farrell so it doesn't look like the minnows getting screwed over.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #512

    @MiketheSnow said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @Stargazer said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Moala's appeal has been dismissed. So still the 5-week suspension.

    The games he has missed/will still miss:
    Tonga v Canada – 15 August, 2023
    Clermont Auvergne v Perpignan – 26 August, 2023
    Ireland v Tonga – 16 September, 2023
    Scotland v Tonga – 24 September, 2023
    South Africa v Tonga – 1 October, 2023

    world.rugby

    Latest News | World Rugby

    Latest News | World Rugby

    The latest World Rugby news, including about the World Rankings, Tournaments, Player Welfare and the Laws of the Game

    Fucking disgrace

    And I would gladly say that to both faces of each person of the committee which came to that conclusion

    Clearly the outrage level is not high enough to pressure them into a change

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    wrote on last edited by
    #513

    Have I missed the outcome of Vunipolas hearing or hasn’t it happened yet?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Nevorian on last edited by
    #514

    @Nevorian said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Have I missed the outcome of Vunipolas hearing or hasn’t it happened yet?

    You missed it, 3 games -1 for school

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #515

    i honestly dont get how things work, actual direct contact to the head gets less than a dangerous tackle that resulted in the head hitting the ground after shoulder contact etc

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #516

    As the Canadian player was considered to have landed on his head, I think that starting from the mid-range point for Moala's suspension was correct: that's 10 weeks (Law 9.18). He got the full 50% deduction for mitigating factors. This is entirely consistent with the guidelines and previous cases.

    I really don't know how often I have to explain this, but Farrell and Vunipola's offending (dangerous = high tackle) falls under a different law (Law 9.13), which has a different mid-range starting point of 6 weeks.
    Vunipola got the full 50% deduction, so his suspension ended up at 3 weeks. Getting tackle lessons is another game deduction: 2 weeks.

    Farrell didn't get the full deduction. He ended up with a 4 week suspension. I think there's room for an argument that that should have been 5, but that's about it.

    The process - after the appeal procedures - has had the right outcome from a procedural and applicable law point of view. The criticism of the judiciary is ridiculous, but done out of lack of understanding of the process and the applicable Laws.

    What should be on World Rugby's table is that a mid-range starting point is used/recommended for shoulder hits to the head. IMO, they should either prescribe that in those cases a high-range starting point should be applied (10+ weeks) or they should raise the mid-range starting point for this particular offence.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #517

    @Stargazer said in Rugby World Cup news:

    I really don't know how often I have to explain this, but

    I'm gonna say that ain't the last.

    I think the main difference from Farrels and other attempted tackles, is there was zero attempt to wrap, so wasn't an attempted tackle, purely a shoulder charge with direct contact to the head, imo these should be looked at differently

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #518

    @taniwharugby The lack of attempt to wrap was the reason why it was a red card and why the appeals committee upheld the appeal.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by Dan54
    #519

    @Kiwiwomble said in Rugby World Cup news:

    i honestly dont get how things work, actual direct contact to the head gets less than a dangerous tackle that resulted in the head hitting the ground after shoulder contact etc

    I actually think Kiwi whatever we think of cases, without being stupid ,the end result could well of been Farrell knocked his fella out. Moala's could of ended up in wheelchair with a broken neck.
    I admit to being real leery of broken necks having being on a sideline when a young fella broke his neck (not from tackle), the a year later a young fella I had coached at times as a kid, and a mate of son (platyed in a couple of teams with him) also ended up in a wheelchair in a dangerous tackle in a league game (he was only 20) , and also had a situation where own son had a suspected broken neck in a college game, (scaredest I ever been in my life in the ambulance on way to hospital.
    Only explained that in why I think tip tackles are so bad, in no way playing down on risk of brain injuies etc, and agree high shots also have to be jumped on!!

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steve
    wrote on last edited by
    #520

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    scribe
    replied to Steve on last edited by
    #521
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    scribe
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #522

    3FE143EC-D981-4150-8B54-08E3BA65DFA2.jpeg

    1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #523

    Rhys Webb tests positive for Human Growth Hormone.

    Rhys Webb (Biarritz) positif à l'hormone de croissance

    Rhys Webb (Biarritz) positif à l'hormone de croissance

    <b>INFO L'ÉQUIPE</b>. Le demi de mêlée gallois Rhys Webb, 34 ans, qui évolue cette saison à Biarritz, en Pro D2, a été contrôlé positif à l'hormone de croissance.

    MiketheSnowM HigginsH 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #524

    @sparky said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Rhys Webb tests positive for Human Growth Hormone.

    Rhys Webb (Biarritz) positif à l'hormone de croissance

    Rhys Webb (Biarritz) positif à l'hormone de croissance

    <b>INFO L'ÉQUIPE</b>. Le demi de mêlée gallois Rhys Webb, 34 ans, qui évolue cette saison à Biarritz, en Pro D2, a été contrôlé positif à l'hormone de croissance.

    Bit late

    He’s too old to grow any taller

    Imbecile

    That’s his career over

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #525

    And I should clarify , he retired from international Rugby in May so he wasn’t going to play in the RWC.

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #526

    @sparky said in Rugby World Cup news:

    And I should clarify , he retired from international Rugby in May so he wasn’t going to play in the RWC.

    Biaritz should have been his pension

    Fucking idiot

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by MiketheSnow
    #527

    No match thread

    Cracking match

    Italy v Japan
    Back and forth

    Italy too strong and accurate at the end

    Italy 42-21 Japan

    Worst commentary team ever

    One bird on coke, the other on tramadol

    Nightmare

    chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #528

    @Dan54 said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @Billy-Tell said in Rugby World Cup news:

    Am I missing a joke or do some people not know how to spell Pumas?

    As Canes said I hit O instead of P when saying how I thought things were strom in a teacup...

    I am sure the replies were just made in ouma.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #529

    @MiketheSnow
    Makes one side of the draw look somewhat silly now.

    boobooB MiketheSnowM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #530

    @chimoaus said in Rugby World Cup news:

    @MiketheSnow
    Makes one side of the draw look somewhat silly now.

    Now?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Rugby World Cup general discussion
Sports Talk
rwc
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.