• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Rank your AB RWC coaches

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
78 Posts 23 Posters 1.1k Views
Rank your AB RWC coaches
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    Anyway, Main's worst selection was Mitchell because it gave him the clout to play overseas and then get coaching jobs, then come back to NZ and waltz into the AB job on the back of one middling Super campaign, which almost ruining rugby as a pastime for me.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #47

    @dogmeat The selection that really pissed me off at the time was dropping Gatland for Dowd. Waikato had a dominant scrum/pack at the time and Gatland was a big part of that in 1992/93.

    Forster was a marginal selection for me too.

    @Nepia If you asked us Mooloo supporters in 1993 which of the Waikato loose forward trio was most deserving of AB selection Mitchell would have been third on that list.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #48

    @Bovidae said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @dogmeat The selection that really pissed me off at the time was dropping Gatland for Dowd. Waikato had a dominant scrum/pack at the time and Gatland was a big part of that in 1992/93.

    Forster was a marginal selection for me too.

    @Nepia If you asked us Mooloo supporters in 1993 which of the Waikato loose forward trio was most deserving of AB selection Mitchell would have been third on that list.

    Ah, it's all really about Monkley being overlooked. 😉 Who was the blindside in the early 90s? Jerram?

    Obviously at that time I thought both Dowd and Gatland shouldn't have been there - it should have been Hewitt.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    @Bovidae

    Entirely academic really - no one was going to get on the park until Fitzy got crocked.

    Dominant Waikato pack?

    1992 Waikato 17 Harbour 30
    1993 Harbour 18 Waikato 14
    1994 Waikato 23 Harbour 35
    1995 Harbour 28 Waikato 29

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #50

    @dogmeat said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    Entirely academic really - no one was going to get on the park until Fitzy got crocked.

    Agree, but I'm sticking to my criticism. 😉

    Dominant Waikato pack?

    Based on the performances against an AB-dominated Auckland team (e.g., 1992 SF and 1993 RS win). NH had a gun backline in that period though.

    @Nepia Yes, Jerram.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    Well Foster can't be rated until afterthe ABs are finsihed, as it only WC coaches.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by MN5
    #52

    @dogmeat said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @Bovidae

    Agree re Hart in 92

    As for your comments about Mains as a selector I agree he was a better coach than selector, but I had a bit of time on my hands.

    Here are the players who debuted under Mains

    9e47a009-825c-4a1e-a0a1-77e7c10c77c5-image.png

    As you would expect it is dominated by the three leading sides of the era - Akl, Harbour, Otago. The 4th was Waikato but they didn't have as great a representation.

    Canterbury started to come right at the end of his era.

    I don't think there were that many out and out duds. The ones I have greyed are the ones IMO had a pretty average career but even then some extenuating factors.

    Most were bench warmers. Stensness had a great third test against Lions (and replaced Little a Harbour man) Dowd G had the misfortune to sit behind Fitzy. Bachop best option at the time. Forster - like Pene one good year that justified selection. Mitchell chosen as a mid-week captain.

    The real duds were Fromont, Lam, Howarth, Seymour, Turner, Cooksley.

    Not that much of a Harbour Otago bias.

    By contrast Hart thought he could do a Michael Jones again and picked some real stinkers / unknowns.

    I take offence to some of the ones you’ve shaded.

    Alama Ieremia did his job in black, trucking it up unselfishly to set up Jonah/Tana/Goldie/Cully etc. there’s been far worse midfielders than him.

    Mark Cooksley did pretty well at times. Tough for him to get past Jones/Brooke.

    Marc Ellis had some good moments, it’s not the All Blacks fault he took off to league.

    Simon Culhane was never going to get past Merhts/Spencer on a regular basis.

    Then again, I just re read this post and some of these can be classed as “extenuating factors” 😉

    I’ve just had another look and Mains clearly hated the nations fine capital, wow !

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    Who thinks NZ beat Aus if Umaga was selected at 13? McDonald was standing out of position when Spencer's pass was picked off by Mortlock. Umaga also wouldn't have let his midfield channel get dominated by the same guy throughout the match.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #54

    @MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    I’ve just had another look and Mains clearly hated the nations fine capital, wow !

    Did they have any decent players in that era?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #55

    @Nepia said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    I’ve just had another look and Mains clearly hated the nations fine capital, wow !

    Did they have any decent players in that era?

    Jon Preston ? He was picked earlier obviously……

    Also a bunch of guys who had all too brief careers but were more than decent like Filo Tiatia, Marty Berry, Jason O’Halloran……

    …..also soon to be Scotsmen Gordon Simpson and Marty Leslie.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #56

    @MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @Nepia said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    I’ve just had another look and Mains clearly hated the nations fine capital, wow !

    Did they have any decent players in that era?

    Jon Preston ? He was picked earlier obviously……

    Also a bunch of guys who had all too brief careers but were more than decent like Filo Tiatia, Marty Berry, Jason O’Halloran……

    …..also soon to be Scotsmen Gordon Simpson and Marty Leslie.

    So he picked Preston and selected Berry again after a 7 year gap. Tiatia and O'Halloran were probably too early in this careers. And the Scots were Scots level. 😉

    I don't think Mains hated the capital, they just didn't have that many pickable players at the time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to kiwi_expat on last edited by
    #57

    @kiwi_expat I thought that was Deans' fault? 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #58

    @Canes4life said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    My worst coaches in no particular order are:
    Mitchell because he dropped Cullen.
    Hart because he played Cullen at centre.
    Foster because he’s damaged the All Black’s reputation with his shit record.

    Cullen was spent by 2003. People wanted him to be the same Cullen. Unfortunately he was no longer the same guy.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #59

    @KiwiMurph said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @Canes4life said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    My worst coaches in no particular order are:
    Mitchell because he dropped Cullen.
    Hart because he played Cullen at centre.
    Foster because he’s damaged the All Black’s reputation with his shit record.

    Cullen was spent by 2003. People wanted him to be the same Cullen. Unfortunately he was no longer the same guy.

    That's not true at all. He was still the best fullback in the country that year even if he wasn't peak Cullen.

    MN5M Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Nepia on last edited by MN5
    #60

    @Nepia said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @KiwiMurph said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @Canes4life said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    My worst coaches in no particular order are:
    Mitchell because he dropped Cullen.
    Hart because he played Cullen at centre.
    Foster because he’s damaged the All Black’s reputation with his shit record.

    Cullen was spent by 2003. People wanted him to be the same Cullen. Unfortunately he was no longer the same guy.

    That's not true at all. He was still the best fullback in the country that year even if he wasn't peak Cullen.

    He’d lost that yard of pace that meant he went from outstanding to just “good” but yeah, probably still the best.

    If only Foster was his coach, he’d have picked him no matter what.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #61

    @Nepia said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @KiwiMurph said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @Canes4life said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    My worst coaches in no particular order are:
    Mitchell because he dropped Cullen.
    Hart because he played Cullen at centre.
    Foster because he’s damaged the All Black’s reputation with his shit record.

    Cullen was spent by 2003. People wanted him to be the same Cullen. Unfortunately he was no longer the same guy.

    That's not true at all. He was still the best fullback in the country that year even if he wasn't peak Cullen.

    He was better than fůcking Ben Blair and Ben Atiga.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    Main was an interesting one. Mixed some of the best AB performances of all time with some of the worst. His constant cutting and changing didn't help. I think much of the RWC powder dry arguments come from the fact that he deliberately (or so he claims) played conservatively in 94 to hide his plans for 95. Certainly there is night and day between those teams, but also no Mehrtens, Kronfeld, Osborne, and (ready) Lomu. But I think they definitely took the pace of the game to another level and Mains has to be credited with that.

    Hart gets shit for the Cullen 13 thing but tbf he was being bombarded with calls to make it happen. And it wasn't a disaster or anything, but Cullen was just a much better 15.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #63

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    Main was an interesting one. Mixed some of the best AB performances of all time with some of the worst. His constant cutting and changing didn't help. I think much of the RWC powder dry arguments come from the fact that he deliberately (or so he claims) played conservatively in 94 to hide his plans for 95. Certainly there is night and day between those teams, but also no Mehrtens, Kronfeld, Osborne, and (ready) Lomu. But I think they definitely took the pace of the game to another level and Mains has to be credited with that.

    Hart gets shit for the Cullen 13 thing but tbf he was being bombarded with calls to make it happen. And it wasn't a disaster or anything, but Cullen was just a much better 15.

    Imagine if the fern was around in 99 ( actually for all I know it was in a simpler form…..)

    The amount of posts with this backline suggestion…..

    15 Cullen
    14 Wilson
    13 Umaga
    12 Ieremia
    11 Lomu

    …..would have crashed the system !

    canefanC dogmeatD DuluthD 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to MN5 on last edited by canefan
    #64

    @MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    Main was an interesting one. Mixed some of the best AB performances of all time with some of the worst. His constant cutting and changing didn't help. I think much of the RWC powder dry arguments come from the fact that he deliberately (or so he claims) played conservatively in 94 to hide his plans for 95. Certainly there is night and day between those teams, but also no Mehrtens, Kronfeld, Osborne, and (ready) Lomu. But I think they definitely took the pace of the game to another level and Mains has to be credited with that.

    Hart gets shit for the Cullen 13 thing but tbf he was being bombarded with calls to make it happen. And it wasn't a disaster or anything, but Cullen was just a much better 15.

    Imagine if the fern was around in 99 ( actually for all I know it was in a simpler form…..)

    The amount of posts with this backline suggestion…..

    15 Cullen
    14 Wilson
    13 Umaga
    12 Ieremia
    11 Lomu

    …..would have crashed the system !

    Especially as it would have been dial up...

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #65

    @canefan said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @MN5 said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Rank your AB RWC coaches:

    Main was an interesting one. Mixed some of the best AB performances of all time with some of the worst. His constant cutting and changing didn't help. I think much of the RWC powder dry arguments come from the fact that he deliberately (or so he claims) played conservatively in 94 to hide his plans for 95. Certainly there is night and day between those teams, but also no Mehrtens, Kronfeld, Osborne, and (ready) Lomu. But I think they definitely took the pace of the game to another level and Mains has to be credited with that.

    Hart gets shit for the Cullen 13 thing but tbf he was being bombarded with calls to make it happen. And it wasn't a disaster or anything, but Cullen was just a much better 15.

    Imagine if the fern was around in 99 ( actually for all I know it was in a simpler form…..)

    The amount of posts with this backline suggestion…..

    15 Cullen
    14 Wilson
    13 Umaga
    12 Ieremia
    11 Lomu

    …..would have crashed the system !

    Especially as it would have been dial up...

    Sound Effects | Royalty-free download for video | Epidemic Sound

    Sound Effects | Royalty-free download for video | Epidemic Sound

    Explore our sound effects library with over 200,000 unique sound effects and variations - unlimited downloads! Cutting edge SFX, curated to fit your needs.

    usx=14492154145&utm_source=google&utm_medium=paidsearch&utm_campaign=max_14492154145&utm_term=&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI8-KniP-ogQMVkqJmAh1e2wDzEAAYAiAAEgJ_IPD_BwE

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Rank your AB RWC coaches
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.