• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Blues v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
275 Posts 46 Posters 16.3k Views
Blues v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to ruggabee on last edited by
    #47

    @ruggabee said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Kirwan said in Blues v Crusaders:

    Refs differently against the Blues, particularly when it's the Cantabs. When the pressure comes on he is wildly inconsistent.

    Everyone reffed the Saders differently the previous 5 or so years. It's only Dolman so far this year who didn't get the memo to cease and desist.

    the last five years eh? ah well, at least Razor gets a claim to his titles from 2017 and 2018, as they are the only legit ones!

    They belong to Sam Whitelock

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    ruggabee
    replied to Bones on last edited by ruggabee
    #48

    @Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @ruggabee said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Kirwan said in Blues v Crusaders:

    Refs differently against the Blues, particularly when it's the Cantabs. When the pressure comes on he is wildly inconsistent.

    Everyone reffed the Saders differently the previous 5 or so years. It's only Dolman so far this year who didn't get the memo to cease and desist.

    the last five years eh? ah well, at least Razor gets a claim to his titles from 2017 and 2018, as they are the only legit ones!

    They belong to Sam Whitelock

    just like the 7 titles he won between 2010-2016? along with others in their athletic peak years such as McCaw, Carter, Read, Frank's Bros, Todd, Moody, Whitelock's, Romano, Bird, Crotty, SBW, Guilford, Fruean, Maitland, Crockett, Ellis, Taufua, Flynn, Laulala, Nadolo, Dagg, etc.. those titles?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to ruggabee on last edited by Bones
    #49

    @ruggabee Athletic park closed over two decades ago mate. It's apt it's a retirement village now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #50

    Interesting stat from Stuff

    Just one Crusader - Tom Christie - who started last year’s final against the Chiefs will start at Eden Park.
    
    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #51

    @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @frugby said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @george33 said in Blues v Crusaders:

    Darry will be at Auckland, next year after Canterbury contract ends , must be following Segner

    Yeah Canterbury have a lot of young locks coming through.
    Gallagher,Cahill,Hannah plus a couple in the u/20s Sa,Jack and Frost.
    He played poorly in last NPC for Canterbury time to move on.

    Looking at the locks to come out of the Canterbury region the past 5 years (both those schooled there and those imported) and I really think the Crusaders have missed out on the best two (Holland and Darry).

    I won't comment on those U20s guys, but IMO Gallagher, Cahill and Hannah all end up as journeyman. Darry could join them there, but he looked quite good in pre-season plus the early minutes prior to his injury.

    Time will tell they are young for locks.
    Hannah looks like a real athlete to me.
    The u/20 locks are all big units for their age
    Will at least be one AB out of those 3,

    Darry was poor for his first 2 years in SR even Blues fans on here were bagging him for being shit.
    Young locks need time Hannah and Cahill have only had a few minutes off the bench so far in their careers.
    A bit early based on a few minutes to brand them journeymen just yet.

    As I say, won't comment on the U20 locks but from what I have seen (namely for the U20s and in the NPC), Cahill just lacks a little bit across the board to go to the next level - not to say he won't be a tidy Super Rugby lock.

    Gallagher will probably be very good for the Crusaders, but IMO he lacks the size to play test footy

    Hannah could well surprise me - I admit, I have not seen much of him since he put all the size on.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Looks like it could be a wet weather game

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    george33
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #53

    @KiwiMurph looks ok at kick off but this is Auckland will suit our big pack

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    george33
    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    This Blues Pack is quite some size ,they are well over 900kg put together, not sure on Crusaders

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #55

    @frugby said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @frugby said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @george33 said in Blues v Crusaders:

    Darry will be at Auckland, next year after Canterbury contract ends , must be following Segner

    Yeah Canterbury have a lot of young locks coming through.
    Gallagher,Cahill,Hannah plus a couple in the u/20s Sa,Jack and Frost.
    He played poorly in last NPC for Canterbury time to move on.

    Looking at the locks to come out of the Canterbury region the past 5 years (both those schooled there and those imported) and I really think the Crusaders have missed out on the best two (Holland and Darry).

    I won't comment on those U20s guys, but IMO Gallagher, Cahill and Hannah all end up as journeyman. Darry could join them there, but he looked quite good in pre-season plus the early minutes prior to his injury.

    Time will tell they are young for locks.
    Hannah looks like a real athlete to me.
    The u/20 locks are all big units for their age
    Will at least be one AB out of those 3,

    Darry was poor for his first 2 years in SR even Blues fans on here were bagging him for being shit.
    Young locks need time Hannah and Cahill have only had a few minutes off the bench so far in their careers.
    A bit early based on a few minutes to brand them journeymen just yet.

    As I say, won't comment on the U20 locks but from what I have seen (namely for the U20s and in the NPC), Cahill just lacks a little bit across the board to go to the next level - not to say he won't be a tidy Super Rugby lock.

    Gallagher will probably be very good for the Crusaders, but IMO he lacks the size to play test footy

    Hannah could well surprise me - I admit, I have not seen much of him since he put all the size on.

    Gallagher is not very tall but he is beefy.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #56

    @cgrant said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @frugby said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @frugby said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @george33 said in Blues v Crusaders:

    Darry will be at Auckland, next year after Canterbury contract ends , must be following Segner

    Yeah Canterbury have a lot of young locks coming through.
    Gallagher,Cahill,Hannah plus a couple in the u/20s Sa,Jack and Frost.
    He played poorly in last NPC for Canterbury time to move on.

    Looking at the locks to come out of the Canterbury region the past 5 years (both those schooled there and those imported) and I really think the Crusaders have missed out on the best two (Holland and Darry).

    I won't comment on those U20s guys, but IMO Gallagher, Cahill and Hannah all end up as journeyman. Darry could join them there, but he looked quite good in pre-season plus the early minutes prior to his injury.

    Time will tell they are young for locks.
    Hannah looks like a real athlete to me.
    The u/20 locks are all big units for their age
    Will at least be one AB out of those 3,

    Darry was poor for his first 2 years in SR even Blues fans on here were bagging him for being shit.
    Young locks need time Hannah and Cahill have only had a few minutes off the bench so far in their careers.
    A bit early based on a few minutes to brand them journeymen just yet.

    As I say, won't comment on the U20 locks but from what I have seen (namely for the U20s and in the NPC), Cahill just lacks a little bit across the board to go to the next level - not to say he won't be a tidy Super Rugby lock.

    Gallagher will probably be very good for the Crusaders, but IMO he lacks the size to play test footy

    Hannah could well surprise me - I admit, I have not seen much of him since he put all the size on.

    Gallagher is not very tall but he is beefy.

    Gallagher 197m 117 ks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    Thought Hannah has looked good in his appearances

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #58

    @Bones thought he was pretty good against the Chiefs?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #59

    @Tim said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Bones thought he was pretty good against the Chiefs?

    Is that his only appearance? I just remember him carrying well and getting around the park.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #60

    @Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Tim said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Bones thought he was pretty good against the Chiefs?

    Is that his only appearance? I just remember him carrying well and getting around the park.

    He came off the bench in all 4 games.this will be his first start v Blues.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    I don't see anything special in Gallagher, and that goes back to watching him as captain of the NZ Schools team.

    Back then Hannah looked like a walking broomstick. He had a high workrate and threw himself around but needed to put 20 kg on.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    george33
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    Just saw report that Strange and Crotty are out for Crusaders

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    george33
    wrote on last edited by
    #63

    Could this be covid related ?

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    george33
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    Cahill starting. confirmed
    ,

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to george33 on last edited by
    #65

    @george33 said in Blues v Crusaders:

    Could this be covid related ?

    Yep covid

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    george33
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    Do U no Crotty replacement yet ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Blues v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.