Jeffrey Epstein
-
@Crucial said in Jeffrey Epstein:
@antipodean said in Jeffrey Epstein:
I'd suggest that it's really quite simple; what was your relationship to Epstein after he was charged?
Does before that not count?
Oh, that's right the actual accusations against Trump are from pre-2008. We are talking about possible actions by Clinton and others that no one has actually alleged in court.
So what if they haven’t been alleged in court? I don’t think you can have it both ways, the other week we didn’t see you criticising the media from publishing unsubstantiated allegations about Trump knowing Putin had put a bounty on US soldiers. IMO that was a legitimate story then and this is a legitimate story now. Or neither is.
-
@Frank said in Jeffrey Epstein:
There's a tendency with the public to want it to be true that powerful rich men are pedos.
Not just the political angle, but the anti-elite angle.
I think one thing that is making people angry is that once you gain enough wealth and political connections, you are essentially above the law. Epstein used to boast about it all the time, and the absolute farce of the 2008 trial and plea deal offered to him, without consulting the victims or even allowing them to speak in court, certainly plays into that. He should have been put away for life then but was given a weak slap on the wrist because of his connections. That's not right.
-
-
@Tim said in Jeffrey Epstein:
@Hooroo I don't know who the interviewer, JS, is, but V is Virginia Giuffre. These are from the newly unsealed documents from her law suit against Ghislaine Maxwell.
Is it common for legal documents to contain mistakes like that?
-
-
Ghislaine Maxwell loses her appeal to keep her testimony sealed.
There may be some sweating now...
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article246561388.html
-
@Stockcar86 poor lady, odds of her taking her own life must have gone waaaaay up now!