• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Science!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
659 Posts 48 Posters 37.3k Views
Science!
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #627

    @antipodean said in Science!:

    Bloody Cantabs fucking up cosmology.

    An article translating:

    The Sciences News

    Cosmological Evidence Emerges That Dark Energy Is An Illusion

    Cosmological Evidence Emerges That Dark Energy Is An Illusion

    Cosmologists have long wondered whether dark energy and the accelerating expansion of the universe is an illusion. Now the evidence backing this idea is mounting.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #628

    Yeah it's a good YouTube channel. I think I prefer that is to 'oh yeah, our numbers don't work, so two thirds of the universe is made up of stuff we can't see or detect, that's why our numbers are wrong'

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #629

    @Machpants said in Science!:

    Yeah it's a good YouTube channel. I think I prefer that is to 'oh yeah, our numbers don't work, so two thirds of the universe is made up of stuff we can't see or detect, that's why our numbers are wrong'

    I do like the idea that you can get a Nobel prize for just making shit up though. Hope for me yet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #630

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #631

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #632

    @booboo Thanks for that

    I found the original X post ... unhelpful.

    Let me explain and then launches into a series of long sentences containing words like inhomogeneities. Clearly the guy has a PhD in wankspeak.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #633

    @dogmeat said in Science!:

    inhomogeneities

    Which having just googled it because I'm a nosey fuck, has a remarkably simple definition. Things which are not homogenous.

    Should have spotted it really but can certainly use it in future when needing to sound like a piston wristed gibbon with some class "A" wankspeak (thank you for that term as well, one that is far more likely to get used).

    More on topic, I stumbled on this the other day:

    9 of the Most Remarkable Scientific Discoveries of 2024

    9 of the Most Remarkable Scientific Discoveries of 2024

    Discover the new planets, moons, health advances, and ancient history uncovered in 2024.

    Didn't know that they had found an Earthlike planet or that they had found a treatment for AIDS with this bit in particular "As more research is done on this drug, it’s possible that other vaccines that attack the capsid proteins of other viruses could emerge." Interesting stuff happening all the time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #634

    yandy182696.jpg

    So 2032 is the end of the World huh?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by booboo
    #635

    Wiki says more likely air burst than impact crater, but maybe damage up to 50 miles away from centre of impact.

    Tsar Bomba nuke, as a comparison, apparently damaged up to 150 miles.

    So not likely end of the world. Yet.

    Would move away from the equatorial parts though ...

    Screenshot_20250208_153801_Chrome.jpg

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #636

    @booboo said in Science!:

    Would move away from the equatorial parts though ...

    You've got more than 5 years to plan and refine I think. So there is some time in hand.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #637

    New headline: Chance of impact has increased 100%

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #638

    So are this lot as good at thier job as meteorologists?

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #639

    @taniwharugby said in Science!:

    So are this lot as good at thier job as meteorologists?

    in fairness, as the location gets refined the chance rises until it either goes to 100 or falls to zero.

    And you have a few years yet 😛

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rembrandt
    wrote on last edited by
    #640

    Not clickbait. The crazy bastards actually did it.

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rembrandt
    wrote on last edited by
    #641

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Rembrandt on last edited by
    #642

    @Rembrandt ha, literally was just discussing this at work!

    I reckon none of these scientists have ever watch Jurassic Park to know how quick things could get out of hand 😉

    Also talking about Wooly Mammoths...

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360644866/watch-first-dire-wolf-howl-10000-years-animal-brought-back-extinction

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #643

    Tasmanian Tiger would be my first pick, awesome and only just extinct

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rembrandt
    wrote on last edited by Rembrandt
    #644

    Facinating interview so far. Mammoths, Tassie Tiger and Dodo all on the list as well as work already done with bringing back species on the brink including the Red wolf

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Rembrandt on last edited by nostrildamus
    #645

    @Rembrandt said in Science!:

    Not clickbait. The crazy bastards actually did it.

    um

    #author.fullName}  /  News

    No, the dire wolf has not been brought back from extinction

    No, the dire wolf has not been brought back from extinction

    Colossal Biosciences claims three pups born recently are dire wolves, but they are actually grey wolves with genetic edits intended to make them resemble the lost species

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rembrandt
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #646

    @nostrildamus said in Science!:

    @Rembrandt said in Science!:

    Not clickbait. The crazy bastards actually did it.

    um

    #author.fullName}  /  News

    No, the dire wolf has not been brought back from extinction

    No, the dire wolf has not been brought back from extinction

    Colossal Biosciences claims three pups born recently are dire wolves, but they are actually grey wolves with genetic edits intended to make them resemble the lost species

    Oh for sure, yes they don't have time machines, so you're well in your rights to completely disregard this scientific achievement and completely ignore the fake Thylacines/Mammoths/Dodos that might soon be coming along with the lifelines to White Rhino/Red Wolfs and other species on the cusp of extinction.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Science!
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.