Cricket: WTC Final Oz vs SA
-
I seem to remember looking up who each team played in this WTC cycle.
Proteas didn't have more than 1 test series that was 3 matches and maybe only played India during that time of the big 3?
I could be misremembering but it says a lot about what they've been able to do here.
-
-
Australia lost this game by not scoring enough runs with the bat.
According to Chat GTP:
"Since 1989, there have been no Test matches in England where a team has won after scoring 429 runs or fewer across both innings combined. This threshold is notably below the typical winning scores in Test cricket, especially in the modern era.
For context, the lowest total to win a Test match in England is 252 runs, achieved by England against Australia at Edgbaston, Birmingham in 2005. In that match, England scored 407 runs in their first innings and 252 in their second innings, totaling 659 runs. Australia, in their second innings, managed 435 runs, resulting in a narrow victory for England by 2 runs.
Therefore, a combined total of 429 runs or fewer across both innings is insufficient for a team to win a Test match in England."
Time for them in inject some new batting talent (if they have any).
-
-
@OomPB I thought the South Africans bowled and fielded beautifully in this match and played the situation and the occasion wonderfully in their second innings. Rabada got the ball in all the right spots on the Lord's pitch and Markram was imperious with the bat in the final innings.
They deserve a heroes' welcome when they get back to RSA. Hopefully, it will lead to South Africa being involved in and hosting some longer Test Series again. You guys are an integral part of world Cricket.
-
