-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback why do you think i want to compare the candidates or have an argument you strange man. i simply answered your question - the one you asked that is, not the one you made up afterwards.
why do you feel the need to defend trump? -
Yes.. why on earth would you compare candidates in a 2 horse race for President of the most powerful country in the world.. in relation to starting wars? Especially in a thread about the election... when were discussing a potential president starting wars...
Carry on with mindless attacking of Trump because the media and celebrities tell you to.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
Yes.. why on earth would you compare candidates in a 2 horse race for President of the most powerful country in the world.. in relation to starting wars? Especially in a thread about the election... when were discussing a potential president starting wars...
Carry on with mindless attacking of Trump because the media and celebrities tell you to.
back to your old tricks eh? ask a question, get an answer, state that you asked a different question, throw your toys because the question you never asked wasn't answered to your satisfaction, then go the personal attack and imply somebody else is stupid - both for not answering the question you never asked, and in general. it's pretty good really, if a little predictable.
you're so determined to pursue your pet topics, and so confident that it is other people who are blinded by 'the media' - all the while copying the jargon your media feeds you - it's getting ridiculous. now i'm saying things because celebrities tell me to? might i ask which celebrities? if you're going to make shit up (TM), you might as well be thorough. -
@reprobate
I have to assume that you are just parroting... because you refused to actually come with anything substantial about how Trump would start a war. When when I ask you for specific examples like I provided with Clinton.. you just start blathering on about what you didn't say.
I am trying to compare actual stated policies and how they might realistically start a war.You... actually I have no idea what you are trying to say beyond ranting that you are saying nothing.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
@reprobate
I have to assume that you are just parroting... because you refused to actually come with anything substantial about how Trump would start a war. When when I ask you for specific examples like I provided with Clinton.. you just start blathering on about what you didn't say.
I am trying to compare actual stated policies and how they might realistically start a war.You... actually I have no idea what you are trying to say beyond ranting that you are saying nothing.
i know you can't be bothered with reading, but why don't you go back and read the question you asked me, and read the reply i gave, and then reply to that - that being when i said something - you obviously missed it in your race to go off on your pet topic and start making stuff up.
you still actually haven't asked me for specific examples at all - you've just stated incorrectly multiple times that you have asked for this, but repetition doesn't make something true. more importantly you've changed the topic, you're trying to re-frame what was being discussed, and i'm not interested. i answered a question specific to trump, specifically said i wasn't saying anything about hillary being better, but you just ignore everything and rant away about whatever you want to anyway, so it's all kinda pointless.as for blathering on about what i didn't say - that seems to become mighty important to you when the shoe is on the other foot - a touch hypocritical no?
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in US Election Thread 2016:
@NTA Yes you did. Stop squirming, it was a stupid statement, just own it and move on.
Squirming? Is that what it's called, when someone refuses to arguea point and says "no I didn't"?
Like you do all the fucking time on this forum?
Prove that I said any of what you're implying - that I SAID EXPLICITLY - or carry on like a fuckwit.
Your choice.
-
@Frank there is actually a bunch of these out there, I have seen about 10.
I am enjoying Schadenfreude today, lol. I particularly like the irony of the Clinton campaign throwing so much BS at Trump on his so called flirtations-yet a decisive moment goes against her because of Weiner's deviancies.
She is evil with a trail of corruption, lies, and death in her past-and she deserves full investigation and punishment. -
The only reason this has resurfaced was not directly because of the FBI and Comey, but instead the investigative work of the NY prosecutor Preet Bahara (badass and highly respected) into Anthony Weiner.
Bahara and his team found the emails on Weiner's on phone and laptop.
James Comey had no choice, his hand was forced. One can also speculate Comey would not have been reopened this case and face the current shitstorm unless some of those emails are indeed damning.
It is also quite nice it wasn't Wikileaks because, for once, Clinton couldn't blame Russia.
-
@Frank yup, I knew 80% of that, thanks. I was online when it hit, and surfed all the useful sites.
Back to Hillary-she shouldn't even be running, which is what Trump has actually said on numerous occasions:
federal law, Title 18. Section 2071."(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.
-
@Frank thanks, I enjoyed that.
Here's a bit more on the latest (pre FBI news) IBD/TIPP poll http://www.investors.com/author/merlinej/
it's a joke.
In a two-way matchup, Clinton tops Trump by 46% to 41%
Raw totals: 332 Democrats 359 Republicans 307 Independents
but after reweighting it's 368 Democrats 299 Republicans 318 Independents
37.3% Democrats 30.4% Republicans 32.3% Independents+7 Democrats
There is no way the turnout will be so skewed to democrats. Possibly 2% spread.
It's more accurate to simply flip the polls to get an idea of who's leading.
Actual Florida returns are showing better R returns than 4 years ago, as are North Carolina. -
Talking of schadenfreude, I have to admit I enjoyed this showing up in my news feed.
Voter fraud in Iowa!
and, she's a Trump supporter
From Des Moines Register:
Voter fraud suspect arrested in Des Moines
A Des Moines woman has been arrested on suspicion of voting twice this month in the general election, police and court records show. -
@gt12 said in US Election Thread 2016:
Talking of schadenfreude, I have to admit I enjoyed this showing up in my news feed.
Voter fraud in Iowa!
and, she's a Trump supporter
From Des Moines Register:
Voter fraud suspect arrested in Des Moines
A Des Moines woman has been arrested on suspicion of voting twice this month in the general election, police and court records show.I read she voted twice because she was concerned her first vote was going to be changed to Clinton. Gee, I wonder how she got that fking stupid idea in her head.
-
-
I always enjoy posting this when people claim that you can take Putin's advice at face-value:
US Politics