Chappell-Hadlee
-
@Chris-B a bit more love for Santner, though the previous discussion was around his place in the test team as a wicket taker, rather then the ODI team as someone that can contain...
Agree on CDGH, that'd be the only change I would make.
-
@No-Quarter said in Chappell-Hadlee:
@Chris-B a bit more love for Santner, though the previous discussion was around his place in the test team as a wicket taker, rather then the ODI team as someone that can contain...
Agree on CDGH, that'd be the only change I would make.
There were one or two suggesting that they wouldn't have him in the ODI team either and that we should play four frontline seamers.
-
@Chris-B. said in Chappell-Hadlee:
@No-Quarter said in Chappell-Hadlee:
@Chris-B a bit more love for Santner, though the previous discussion was around his place in the test team as a wicket taker, rather then the ODI team as someone that can contain...
Agree on CDGH, that'd be the only change I would make.
There were one or two suggesting that they wouldn't have him in the ODI team either and that we should play four frontline seamers.
I am innocent of that charge Your Honour! He's a class act in the limited overs.
What was most pleasing about the wickets of Marsh and Cummins in particular was that they were genuine spinners wickets - dip, turn and bounce to beat the bat for an easy stumping. More of that in the tests please!
-
@No-Quarter said in Chappell-Hadlee:
@Chris-B. said in Chappell-Hadlee:
@No-Quarter said in Chappell-Hadlee:
I am innocent of that charge Your Honour! He's a class act in the limited overs.
Yes, I think it was @shark who explicitly wasn't going to have him for the Chappell-Hadlee.
I missed his Marsh wicket, but Cummins was done comprehensively and just when we needed it.
In rapido's words, he nailed his bowling role yesterday - Stoinis got him a couple of times at the start of his second spell, but otherwise he was excellent.
-
Marsh tried to charge, got beaten in flight and the ball turned back between bat and pad very narrowly missing the stumps. The comms (based on the highlights) seemed to put it down to a Marsh brain fade but he was done by a very good piece of bowling.
-
-
@Chris-B. said in Chappell-Hadlee:
Edit - they've called in Brownlie.
Sweet, let's call in another guy who averages mid 20's, we don't have any of those....
-
Brownlie probably in as a 12th man extra injury cover.
I think @Chris-B is right - CDGH comes into the team and Munro (or possibly Neesh) moves up to open.
Big blow for game two.
-
Not that I want Neesh to be moved from the middle order, but why is Munro being touted as an opener? I can't recall him ever opening for us in an ODI.
-
You either shift everyone up one and have Kane face the new ball, or you sacrifice Munro as a pinch hitter with a (admittedly small) chance of getting us away to a flier.
I lean towards Munro having a go Baz style to see if he can generate a run rate early.
-
@No-Quarter with the field up he's going to hammer a lot of balls straight at cover for no run
-
Yeah, well, he's not exactly ideal coming in anywhere from 1 - 7. Like you I'm not his biggest fan. The shot he got out to yesterday was awful.
Blundell has been opening for the Wellington and Brownlie for ND. So we've got two openers in the squad.
Will be interesting to see what Hess does.
-
-
-
@Chris-B. said in Chappell-Hadlee:
I see that the streaker who disrupted the game has been let off (i.e. given a caution).
Why???
It's become pretty boring and annoying.
Send one fucking streaker to jail for a month and that hobby would pretty much end.
I say let it continue. There's always hope you'll get a hottie every now and again in between a procession of fat fluffybunnies and mingas.
-
@MN5 said in Chappell-Hadlee:
@Chris-B. said in Chappell-Hadlee:
I see that the streaker who disrupted the game has been let off (i.e. given a caution).
Why???
It's become pretty boring and annoying.
Send one fucking streaker to jail for a month and that hobby would pretty much end.
I say let it continue. There's always hope you'll get a hottie every now and again in between a procession of fat fluffybunnies and mingas.
Just go to the beach...or the internet!
-
@MN5 said in Chappell-Hadlee:
@Chris-B. said in Chappell-Hadlee:
I see that the streaker who disrupted the game has been let off (i.e. given a caution).
Why???
It's become pretty boring and annoying.
Send one fucking streaker to jail for a month and that hobby would pretty much end.
I say let it continue. There's always hope you'll get a hottie every now and again in between a procession of fat fluffybunnies and mingas.
Sure, but I'd prefer a woman streaker
