• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Aussie Pro Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
australia
5.2k Posts 136 Posters 924.1k Views
Aussie Pro Rugby
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #57

    @Stargazer The Crusaders have been our strongest team throughout Super rugby - so I'm asking why they thought they needed to bring Volavola (I can understand the value of Nadolo as he almost singlehandedly won them a competition). I said at the start of that sentence I find it odd for any NZ team to bring in foreign players and I was replying to KiwiMurphs post where he mentions three Oz eligible players who contracted by the Crusaders.

    I've got no problem with NZ franchises signing up tier 2 players (PI preferred) but I don't think we should sign up too many tier one players - especially in positions of depth in NZ. The NZRU pays the salaries of the franchises so I think we should reserve most spots of NZ eligible players.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dKD Offline
    dKD Offline
    dK
    wrote on last edited by dK
    #58

    0_1491200198443_NTA at the rugby.PNG

    @NTA at the rugby

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #59

    Overseas players can only be signed to 1-year contracts so the NZ teams need to seek NZR approval each season.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #60

    @Bovidae Digby signed a 2 year deal with Crusaders.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dKD Offline
    dKD Offline
    dK
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #61

    @antipodean

    Working from the left of the Crusaders ear
    Red Beard, NTA then DK

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #62

    @KiwiMurph I was basing my comment on this recent article about Leitch.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/91068723/michael-leitch-wants-to-stick-with-the-chiefs-ahead-of-2019-world-cup-in-japan

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #63

    Just heard on the news that kiwi teams have beaten Aussie teams 33 from the last 36 games , that's pretty abysmal if true.

    They followed it up with fascist queen Alan Jones moaning about Australian schoolboy rugby being ignored.

    UncoU antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #64

    @Nepia said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @Stargazer The Crusaders have been our strongest team throughout Super rugby - so I'm asking why they thought they needed to bring Volavola (I can understand the value of Nadolo as he almost singlehandedly won them a competition). I said at the start of that sentence I find it odd for any NZ team to bring in foreign players and I was replying to KiwiMurphs post where he mentions three Oz eligible players who contracted by the Crusaders.

    I've got no problem with NZ franchises signing up tier 2 players (PI preferred) but I don't think we should sign up too many tier one players - especially in positions of depth in NZ. The NZRU pays the salaries of the franchises so I think we should reserve most spots of NZ eligible players.

    We do reserve most spots.

    On the Volavola signing, I think it was more a case of timing and who was available. Exodus of players plus other up and comers being captured by WTG's.

    We were fortunate that Hunt came up this season. He was our third 10 option behind Richie and McKenzie. But he took his chance and is now our man to run the cutter.

    Sometimes players just don't work out local or foreign.

    With Samu though, he's played ITM for a couple of years now and looked good and probably doesn't want to leave now that he's in.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #65

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #66

    @NTA The Bavarian?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #67

    @Nepia said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @NTA The Bavarian?

    Munich Brauhaus The Rocks - formerly Lowenbrau

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • UncoU Offline
    UncoU Offline
    Unco
    replied to jegga on last edited by Unco
    #68

    @jegga said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    Just heard on the news that kiwi teams have beaten Aussie teams 33 from the last 36 games , that's pretty abysmal if true.

    They followed it up with fascist queen Alan Jones moaning about Australian schoolboy rugby being ignored.

    Didn't the Blues have a draw against an Aussie team last year? The Reds?

    Edit: Yep, Week 4. By my count it's 33 wins from 37 games (25 regular season and 1 QF last season + 11 this season).

    Still shit news for the Aussies but shoddy reporting.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #69

    @ACT-Crusader Agree on Volavola - we had to cast the net wide since we'd lost three test-capped first fives and needed to dredge up at least one who was Super rugby standard. And Richie came through for us - Mitch Hunt is helping to replenish the stocks.

    Digby Ioane is the one that makes me raise my eyebrows - how on earth was he not on an Aussie franchise's radar? I don't much mind that we've got him - he looks like a major asset, but I'm still mystified as to how the Aussie teams have let him slip through their fingers.

    I'm less pleased about Alaalatoa and Jager, because I perceive we have a shortage of tighthead props. Even worse, last year the Highlanders had a couple who weren't AB eligible (Geldenhuys and Halanukonuka) and I think the Chiefs had a Japanese tighthead as well? That's too many foreigners in that position.

    mariner4lifeM No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to jegga on last edited by antipodean
    #70

    @jegga Of course, allegedly* he's most concerned about school boy rugby.

    *My lawyers said that is important.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #71

    @NTA said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @Nepia said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @NTA The Bavarian?

    Munich Brauhaus The Rocks - formerly Lowenbrau

    Are nice, I just assumed since you were at the game you were at one of the very few halfway decent places to eat near the park.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #72

    @Chris-B. maybe Digby took one look at the Reds, thought "fuck that, i wouldn't mind winning a couple of games".

    A lot of frustrated Wallaby fan friends are sharing that Jones interview and agreeing whole heartedly. I can't agree with much except the fact that what they are doing now isn't working. He's in the private schools-Sydney Clubs-NSW/Qld-Wallabies model that existed in the 80s. Typical of Jones, a lot of mouth and soundbite, very little in the way of thought.

    And why do all these commentators assume that the NZRU want to play in the provincial trans-tasman comp?

    dKD DamoD 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • dKD Offline
    dKD Offline
    dK
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #73

    @mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @Chris-B. maybe Digby took one look at the Reds, thought "fuck that, i wouldn't mind winning a couple of games".

    A lot of frustrated Wallaby fan friends are sharing that Jones interview and agreeing whole heartedly. I can't agree with much except the fact that what they are doing now isn't working. He's in the private schools-Sydney Clubs-NSW/Qld-Wallabies model that existed in the 80s. Typical of Jones, a lot of mouth and soundbite, very little in the way of thought.

    And why do all these commentators assume that the NZRU want to play in the provincial trans-tasman comp?

    Maybe add one team to the provincial comp and call them the Australian Warriors ?!?

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #74

    @mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    And why do all these commentators assume that the NZRU want to play in the provincial trans-tasman comp?

    Speaking generally.

    I think at least part of the reason is that in general Australian rugby fans don't seem to have the same affinity with South Africa that we do. To us the Springboks are our greatest rivals, but from what I can tell, to many Aussies they're just a pain in the neck. They can't understand why we would value playing S.A. teams at least as high as we value playing Australian teams.

    Over at GAGR the prevailing sentiment seems to be that either Super Rugby becomes a Trans- Ta$man comp (with post season games against the S.A. conference) or they should walk away entirely and go it alone. I doubt that is the view of the ARU, but it is a popular view amongst Aussie fans on that site.

    antipodeanA NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to dK on last edited by
    #75

    @dK said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    @Chris-B. maybe Digby took one look at the Reds, thought "fuck that, i wouldn't mind winning a couple of games".

    A lot of frustrated Wallaby fan friends are sharing that Jones interview and agreeing whole heartedly. I can't agree with much except the fact that what they are doing now isn't working. He's in the private schools-Sydney Clubs-NSW/Qld-Wallabies model that existed in the 80s. Typical of Jones, a lot of mouth and soundbite, very little in the way of thought.

    And why do all these commentators assume that the NZRU want to play in the provincial trans-tasman comp?

    Maybe add one team to the provincial comp and call them the Australian Warriors ?!?

    And only NZ and SA refs who always seem to see one side's offences

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #76

    @Damo said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    Over at GAGR the prevailing sentiment seems to be that either Super Rugby becomes a Trans- Ta$man comp (with post season games against the S.A. conference) or they should walk away entirely and go it alone. I doubt that is the view of the ARU, but it is a popular view amongst Aussie fans on that site.

    Hahahaha What a collection of retards. If New Zealand stopped supporting Australian rugby, they'd immediately go to back to their highs of the 1970s

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Aussie Pro Rugby
Sports Talk
australia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.